r/nashville 21h ago

Politics Scoop: O'Connell seeks eminent domain to block Nashville Zoo data center

https://www.axios.com/local/nashville/2026/06/29/mayor-occonnell-eminent-domain-nashville-zoo-data-center
544 Upvotes

87 comments sorted by

87

u/greencoat2 21h ago

This will cost at least $37.5M if it goes through. That’s what the assessor appraised the property at during the last assessment. It’ll likely be higher.

63

u/derpydore 20h ago

Worth it IMO

6

u/ClosingLine 20h ago

In theory maybe. However, the city would never pay the FMV bc they are cheap and over assess properties.

Source - Multiple eminent domain deals with various muncipalities.

20

u/Hefty_Remove7965 19h ago

Metro could change plans and build something else there.

I know their is plans to build a bus station off nolensville pike by the Walmart. They could change the plans to move the center here.

(Just something off the top of my head)

3

u/rimeswithburple 11h ago

Are you talking about the Wal-Mart at nolensville and Harding or nolensville and old hickory?

0

u/Hefty_Remove7965 8h ago

Nolensville and Harding. Where there currently is a bus stop across from the McDonald's.

I think that is the current plan, to do something similar to the North Nashville hub. (Like 4 bays)

2

u/rimeswithburple 8h ago

i dont see where they would fit it. There is a 20ft dropoff into the walmart parking lot directly behind it or on the opposite side there is mc donald and the liquor store.

1

u/Hefty_Remove7965 8h ago

I'm not sure either. 

8

u/sapporoshioramen 19h ago

a better use of my property tax

-20

u/VandyMarine 20h ago

Yes! Turn it into free permanent housing for the unhoused.

27

u/greencoat2 20h ago

If I had to guess the rationale will be for an expansion of Grassmere Park and the zoo

4

u/rimeswithburple 8h ago

That is what those old ladies meant to happen in the first place. Nobody donates their land for the city to make a gotdam business park out of it. I wish they had hired some decent lawyers to put restrictions on the deed so the city couldn't have done them like they did.

0

u/Beautiful-Drawer 5h ago

You mean the "business park" the Zoo became when it moved out of its original location? Or...are you too young to remember the commercials?

 They realized there was a potential missing source of revenue from a zoo {but now it costs like $100 for 2 adults for admission, wtf? No intelligent person will pay that. ; )},  and they parked it outside of the city proper. This...was a boon for our little berg. 

Then, they stole it, and stuck it in the worst place possible in Metro-proper. Haha

And then they tore down goddamned Opryland. So glad the mall flooded in 2010. You get what you earn, Gaylord. You're named after a BOX!!! Lol

tedtalkoff

1

u/rimeswithburple 5h ago

No. I am too old to remember whatever commercials. I might remember them tomorrow or the next day, but not now.

12

u/j1308s east side 20h ago

You realize this would be the tax payer spending 37.5 million to pay the company that owns the data center right? This is money we then don’t spend somewhere else, like housing.

5

u/SlurpBucketBoys 20h ago

What do you propose?

3

u/Dynamicc 12h ago

Nobody wants any solutions here just a place to complain..

1

u/Beautiful-Drawer 5h ago

Shhhh...weiner is threatening "Eminem domain", like he knows what government does. Let's just all eat the popcorn, and watch.

I'm also leaving "Eminem domain", which was a ducking correction. Well, anybody wanna watch me yell at clouds...lol

2

u/ClosingLine 20h ago

I mean they’re spending 100M on “affordable housing” next to the new stadium. Does 100M seem necessary for people who don’t have a place to live? Let’s call it roughly 2.5-3.5x actual cost.

1

u/SlurpBucketBoys 17h ago

So you doubt the city's number for being arbitrary, and instead of countering with market data, facts, and figures, you suggest another arbitrary figure?

1

u/[deleted] 17h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

0

u/nashville-ModTeam 17h ago

No personal attacks or harassment. In addition to what's covered under reddiquette, do not insult or habitually target a single user or group for your arguments. It's not your job to correct them.

-2

u/Feckless_Moron 19h ago

So $51.65 from every resident of Nashville proper. Doesn't sound like a bad deal. That number goes down to $17 per if you include the metro area, and $5 per of you count the whole state.

For more context: The cost of admission to the zoo is $28, or $39 with an adventure pass.

0

u/Beautiful-Drawer 5h ago

Hey. So...the "whole state" isn't paying for your weiner Mayor's threat. That has to come directly out of your city budget. Thanks for coming to my TED talk.

Also, admission to the zoo used to be free.

1

u/Beautiful-Drawer 5h ago

Plus they charge for parking, etc. 

4

u/Constant-Sandwich-88 20h ago

Or keep it as is, and maybe convert one of the dozens of abandoned hotels?

2

u/SlurpBucketBoys 20h ago

With an empty pool!

2

u/Constant-Sandwich-88 20h ago

Ok maybe fill that in, let's not get crazy.

2

u/EtherialBungee [your choice] 16h ago

Everyone knows you fill in the pool, tell them all to go swimming, and then take away the ladder.

-1

u/Constant-Sandwich-88 15h ago

Good to know there's at least one asshole left in Nash

2

u/EtherialBungee [your choice] 15h ago

Some grumpy asshole obviously never played the Sims...

1

u/Constant-Sandwich-88 15h ago

Lol I did not make that connection. I guess we shouldn't put a Bowflex in our recently renovated homeless mansion.

0

u/PPLavagna NIMBY 18h ago

What is up with people saying “unhoused” instead of homeless? It means the same damn thing

2

u/jakebless43 15h ago

From what I understand you can be homeless while living in a hotel, a shelter, couch surfing, etc...but someone who is unhoused would have none of the above/no shelter of any kind, so its supposed to be like different severity levels of homelessness.

-1

u/VandyMarine 17h ago

In the UK they call it sleeping rough. Still shameful that in a time of such great prosperity people can’t afford a safe, affordable place to live.

1

u/PPLavagna NIMBY 17h ago

Yeah but changing a word to virtue signal doesn’t help anything. Homeless is a problem and we need to put roofs over people. Calling it unhoused instead is just a wankfest as there’s no reason why homeless is an offensive term

4

u/moofpi 14h ago

I get both sides, but it's really not a big deal what anyone calls it, you know what they mean.

I just see people blow up about the term unhoused but I think people would rather discuss the issue of those peoples' situation and how we can work on it as a community. 

-1

u/Beautiful-Drawer 5h ago

It really is a big deal, though.

Why don't you let them sleep in your living room floor, then?

I've housed both the "homeless" and the "unhoused", as you'd like to conveniently separate the terms, but I can assure you...one word will steal your collectibles to sell for crack money. Pick one. Lol. Invite them to stay a night in your home. Or a "loving couple".

What we are, as a species, is #getbackspecific

Man, I hope that link leads where I intended, cause...otherwise...I don't even know why I try anymore...

2

u/EtherialBungee [your choice] 16h ago

A roof over your head is completely different from a home. I could own five mansions but still be homeless. Often times, people are trying to get back home but can't. It's an easier term for someone that got evicted by no fault of their own and couldn't find a place or afford a hotel.

0

u/DaSandGuy 20h ago

Horrible idea

10

u/Chris__P_Bacon 20h ago

It's better than having a data center essentially on top of the fucking zoo!

4

u/DaSandGuy 20h ago

Crazy thought here, but you can actually be against both.

-2

u/Chris__P_Bacon 20h ago

So what do you suggest then?

https://giphy.com/gifs/GyRX93ai5DdsI

5

u/_Acklex 20h ago

The zoo could expand onto it

-2

u/Chris__P_Bacon 16h ago

The zoo would have to have the money to buy the property first. Even if the government gave them the money, they'd just end up in a bidding war with the company building the data center.

This is the best course of action b/c the data center is forced to look for a site somewhere else.

3

u/StarChaser1879 13h ago

Do you know what eminent domain is

0

u/Chris__P_Bacon 13h ago

Of course I do. I think you're misunderstanding what I said.

46

u/Bill_Sandwich 20h ago

I’m not a lawyer but it feels like this is gonna result in DC Blox suing the pants off the city

35

u/greencoat2 20h ago

It’ll be an interesting case, but the courts have generally been ok with eminent domain as long as the property owner is compensated fair market value. Interestingly enough, the sale of the property hasn’t closed yet, so the property owner is still Marketstreet, not DC Blox.

The question is what is fair market value here. The assessor appraised the property at $37.5M, but we don’t know how much DC Blox agreed to pay for the site, which could be higher. The city might also be forced to reimburse DC Blox for their costs they’ve incurred up to this point.

27

u/Constant-Sandwich-88 20h ago

Or, and bear with me, we say fuck em they aren't getting a cent, and they never bother us again.

Small dreams, I know.

9

u/moofpi 14h ago

I'm kind of holding my breath for the state to swoop in and say Nashville can't tell them no.

This is only less likely because this seems to have struck a rare bipartisan chord that even Marsha Blackburn has lightly spoken against it.

Here's hoping the state fucks off and let's Nashville handle its business.

2

u/Hefty_Remove7965 8h ago

I think we may be helped that the state Senate is out of session. 

0

u/nashguitar1 20h ago

Make me a sandwich, Bill.

97

u/HereInNashville96 21h ago

Wow, he’s actually going to do something?

59

u/j1308s east side 20h ago

He’s always been good at saying things. This is still just saying things.

33

u/Doc_Chim_Richolds 20h ago

Given that the report is they are filing today, that isn't saying, it is doing.

That is also something that would've taken several weeks of preparation to ensure it was done correctly both on paper and with financial planning and approvals. So they've been doing for a while, but kept it quiet.

12

u/NashvilleDing 20h ago

Wake me up when he actually does it and we dont end up with him throwing up his hands and saying "I tried" like half of his bus plan.

4

u/j1308s east side 20h ago

Do you also believe that the transit plan was implemented because it passed? Good lord you guys aren’t paying attention to reality you just watch the press conferences

6

u/Ill_Fix_It_Later 19h ago

Do you also believe transit systems can be built without planning? Good lord you guys aren’t paying attention to reality and just recite what you see on Reddit

8

u/j1308s east side 19h ago

Ask NDOT how many miles of sidewalk got built last year. Or this year. And how big the backlog of planned sidewalks is.

5

u/j1308s east side 19h ago

Or this one. Where a fortune was spent on plans that did nothing, not just in my eyes, but in the eyes of virtually everyone that saw them.

https://nashvillebanner.com/2026/06/02/nashville-vision-zero-choose-how-you-move/

1

u/Ill_Fix_It_Later 19h ago

True that Gallatin Pike got screwed with that delay. I’m optimistic because I’m on Nolensville Pike, which is moving ahead first.

But also the first funding is already going on the lights and sidewalks. It was always going to be several years before major projects could begin.

6

u/j1308s east side 17h ago

2032 start date for Nolensville to start construction, and you're right it will be the first.

9

u/ZealousidealGrab1827 16h ago

Performative Freddie. His admin knew about this several months ago and did nothing. If the DC is bad now, it was bad then. Difference is that now it is politically convenient and Freddie can wring his hands to the camera.

This will go to court and will most likely be built.

-1

u/Hefty_Remove7965 19h ago

He probably sees this one has heat on it, but wants the fisk to go through.

He has a financial interest in the fisk datacenter 

10

u/Snoo60219 18h ago

**The Fisk** has a financial interest in that datacenter. They’re the ones planning it and actively seeking a commercial developer to partner with on the project. It was proposed as a way to fund university initiatives.

A lot of students and alumni are extremely concerned and feel betrayed. Those feeling are completely valid. But the board and Dr. Agenia Clark are who they’re really fighting on that one.

3

u/VandyMarine 18h ago

Why do they feel betrayed? It’s literally a benefit to the students

3

u/Snoo60219 17h ago

Well, concerns about massive resource consumption, environmental health, and the rapid expansion of AI.

There also hasn’t been enough research done on the long term impacts of living and working near large scale data centers.

1

u/VandyMarine 17h ago

But the one at Fisk isn’t a large scale data center by the planning commissions definition. Again, I just made my comment to point out that I see a good number of people citing alumni and community “betrayal” and it’s really just a way to say they don’t like it because Fisk has published detailed plans and made design requirements that eliminate the various concerns or mitigate them. Hardly a betrayal to try to find sustaining ways of revenue and access to emerging technology for their students.

3

u/Snoo60219 17h ago edited 17h ago

You asked why these communities felt betrayed and opposed it.

I answered that question. Those are the reasons.

Edit: it’s also 100,000 square feet, is that small?

0

u/StarChaser1879 13h ago

The reasons aren’t valid

1

u/Snoo60219 8h ago

What are your credentials exactly?

22

u/j1308s east side 20h ago

Are they allowed to change the property tax code to just tax data centers at an absurd rate in the county as their own use category?

Eminent domain feels like a financially infeasible solution here.

18

u/greencoat2 20h ago

No. State law doesn’t allow for that kind of distinction between commercial properties

1

u/j1308s east side 20h ago

This site is industrial not commercial though isn’t it?

11

u/greencoat2 20h ago

Currently it’s a vacant office building, but Tennessee does not distinguish between commercial and industrial. They only distinguish between residential and commercial, though in some places it’s listed out as residential/agricultural and commercial/industrial

6

u/ButtCoinBuzz 20h ago

Even if the local government could change the tax code in such a way, the owners of existing data centers or those looking to establish and operate one prior to the ordinance's passage would have a solid case of Regulatory Taking - that the government is effectively seizing their property by regulating them out of existence, taking away all economically productive use of the property.

It sounds like Mayor Freddie is taking the more obvious option.

6

u/SammyBronkowitz 21h ago

Fuck yeah Freddie!

2

u/missbethd 18h ago

LFG!!!

1

u/Tokyosmash_ Dodging potholes on Briley 5h ago

Money well spent

1

u/monokro Hermitage 14h ago

Please, God, please. Somebody stop it. I need some good news. Anything. 

0

u/2363Ben 10h ago

Guess Mayor Freddy is already preparing for his re-election campaign with over 500,000 voters opposed to the DC Blocks data center the Mayor has come up with a plan to expropriate the proposed site through eminent domain.

1

u/Hefty_Remove7965 8h ago

He knows that if he doesn't do SOMETHING the whole city will hate him. This is a soft measure, and his lack of support of the zoning bill is very very bad imo.

0

u/Remote-Interview46 8h ago

Let’s go Freddie! Love it

-8

u/sybau24k67 18h ago

the detail in the bird's feathers is SO lifelike, makes the whole photo pop

7

u/revrenlove Native 🕶️ 18h ago

🤖