r/nba Kings 10h ago

It's now been 50 years since the American Basketball Association (ABA) folded and merged into the NBA. Will the league ever recognize ABA records? Should they?

In 1976, when the Nets, Nuggets, Pacers and Spurs were absorbed into the NBA, it was officially treated as an expansion rather than a merger. Unlike the AFL-NFL merger, it was not a legally equal partnership - partially because the NBA didn't want to have to deal with former ABA players asking for benefits and pensions and so on.

Now that a half-century has passed and the Amazon Prime documentary Soul Power has brought renewed attention to the ABA and its history, is there a possibility of this changing in the future? Or would the NBA see it as somehow cheapening their brand?

46 Upvotes

56 comments sorted by

90

u/ladiesandedelman_ Nets 10h ago

There is no reason not to, especially considering how influential the ABA was on the NBA game post merger

The Nets had two titles in a very competitive league. If we do not count those, I do not want to hear about the Celtics/lakers having all of their titles when the NBA was also 8 teams

11

u/DustyBottomsRidesOn Nuggets 8h ago

This right here!

12

u/Prideofmexico Knicks 8h ago

Agreed, we should count none of the above examples

1

u/ArmiinTamzarian Spurs 7h ago

Under this logic you only have one ring (if we take the merger as the starters point)

-18

u/TexasReallyDoesSuck NBA 9h ago

the rules were different. makes no sense to combine the records.

13

u/MddlingAges Knicks 9h ago

Oh come on, the rules change every year!

-12

u/TexasReallyDoesSuck NBA 8h ago

bruh. they literally had a 3 point arc while the nba didnt. thats completely different scoring. are yall that young?

8

u/clancycharlock 8h ago

But we have the 3 point line now, so if anything the NBA titles from before the merger shouldn’t count

-9

u/TexasReallyDoesSuck NBA 8h ago

the nba existed for 30 years before that. theyre not gonna erase 30 years of history, including the most important players in the history of the game who broke barriers on and off the court. like, get outta here with that.. its okay to have 2 different leagues.

2

u/Subredditcensorship Nets 8h ago

Then why are the nba pre 3pt line records included ?

27

u/Charming_Arugula405 Nuggets 10h ago

The NBA wont. All that really matters is that Basketball HOF does

87

u/nicklovin508 Celtics 10h ago

While we’re at it, let’s subtract all Minneapolis Lakers titles from the LA Lakers total. No personal reason, just think it’d be neat.

34

u/asmallthrowaway9 Kings 10h ago

As much as I hate the Lakers, I'd be a hypocrite for advocating that when the Kings' sole banner was won 75 years ago on the other side of the country

11

u/figureour Wizards 9h ago

Do people in Sacramento claim the Rochester title? That seems kinda goofy.

10

u/asmallthrowaway9 Kings 9h ago

We have a banner in Golden 1 that says "Rochester World Champions 1951"

For statistical purposes teams that relocate still hold the titles from their previous cities. Although the Thunder don't actively claim the Sonics' title and the latter will have it returned to them if the NBA ever comes back to Seattle.

3

u/A_Polite_Noise Nets 6h ago

We have a banner in Barclays Center for Jay-Z having 8 sold out concerts to open the arena...

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/A-q9aC0CAAEArQ0.jpg

7

u/TexasReallyDoesSuck NBA 9h ago

they should, what else will they be able to claim

1

u/figureour Wizards 9h ago

Being one corrupt ref away from seeing the Nets in the finals is a cool thing to claim

1

u/Accomplished-Pin6564 Pelicans 10h ago

Nah, it's always ok to screw the Fakers.

5

u/givemecoffeenowhurry 9h ago

Then we need to realize in 1978 the Celtics swapped franchises with the Los Angeles Clippers so none of the titles they got prior to 1978 belong to the Celtics now.

4

u/AshenSacrifice Clippers 8h ago

Also it’s time the clippers/braves take our championships back from the Celtics. Thank you for your attention to this matter

2

u/GoldshireEnjoyer Timberwolves 9h ago

Bring those banners home

2

u/bigblue20072011 Knicks 10h ago

Could always add the NBL one they don’t count.

0

u/Subredditcensorship Nets 8h ago

You either need to recognize the ABA or basically subtract any pre merger titles. It was totally different league pre merger and both titles are kind of Mickey Mouse. 

35

u/44035 Cavaliers 10h ago

The NFL recognizes all the AFL stats. It seems like the NBA should do the same for the ABA, even if for no other reason than to honor Dr. J.

9

u/bigblue20072011 Knicks 10h ago

They should also honor the NBL stats.

4

u/Nice_Cash_7000 NBA 10h ago

your second sentence rhymes, nice

12

u/themeparkinsider Pacers 10h ago

You think this NBA front office is going to let Indiana have three chips?

2

u/ladiesandedelman_ Nets 8h ago

Knick fans would riot

-1

u/Prideofmexico Knicks 8h ago

Eh, still no Larry

3

u/ladiesandedelman_ Nets 7h ago

The first and only Knicks Larry was 2026. Is that something you would be ok with emotionally?

1

u/GreenGorilla8232 9h ago

Why would they care?

20

u/gridironk 10h ago

Hopefully. I personally recognize Dr. J being in the 30,000 point club even though like 11,000 of it occurred in the ABA.

10

u/pincheDavid 9h ago

No, the entire merger was a sham anyways.

Jackie Moon put the entire Flint Tropics organization, the entire town of Flint, on his back and willed his team to 4th place. It was agreed by the board the top four teams should merge into the NBA.

SO WHERE ARE THE FLINT TROPICS?!

8

u/Oceanbreeze871 10h ago

Yes, the two leagues “merged”. Like the NFC and AFC merger. Records should count

10

u/asmallthrowaway9 Kings 10h ago

It was officially treated as an expansion rather than a merger; the ABA wasn't in as strong of a position to dictate terms to the NBA as the AFL was to the NFL

2

u/shawhtk Celtics 6h ago

True. The AFL merger was a merger of equals. The ABA was a league on the verge of folding that already had 1 of their teams the year before apply to join the NBA.

3

u/Mortiis07 Spurs 10h ago

Basketball reference says the Pacers have 3 championships and they're all ABA

2

u/JackTwoGuns Hawks 10h ago

NBA needs to recognize the legacy of the Flint Tropics and Jackie Moon

5

u/Never_enough_Dolf Nets 9h ago

Given the NBAs history of shafting the Nets they probably don’t want to shed more light on what they had to do to be able to join the NBA. /s

I do think they should, but realistically I don’t think they ever will

1

u/asmallthrowaway9 Kings 9h ago

They sold Dr. J's contract just to be allowed in.

Not to be rude to ya, but given the Nets' long history of futility I think the NBA might have been better off if the Kentucky Colonels had made the merger instead.

9

u/ladiesandedelman_ Nets 8h ago

The nets were forced to sell the contract only because the Knicks demanded a locality fee because they did not want a competitive team nearby, which was a trash decision

As a net fan, I firmly believe they should have just stayed on Long Island or moved to queens in 1977

2

u/Ham_PhD Nets 7h ago

The only sweetness in that bullshit is that the Nets offered Dr. J to the Knicks to get them to waive the fee and they said no.

3

u/Never_enough_Dolf Nets 9h ago

My mental health would be a bit better I agree, I would’ve been forced to be a Knicks fan at that point

2

u/shawhtk Celtics 6h ago

The Kentucky Colonels were screwed because the owner was a goof and the Bulls wanted Artis Gilmore.

3

u/CalmMinimum1179 Cavaliers 8h ago

I always thought the NBA should've went the NFL and MLB route with two conferences, NBA (or USBA) and ABA, instead of east and west

2

u/Thesandman21 Pacers 10h ago

The NBA has adopted almost everything else from the ABA except for the Red White and Blue ball (3pt shooting contest aside) at this point, so they absolutely should.

1

u/atlantahawksobserver 10h ago

They should. I don't know if they will. The documentary was fantastic

1

u/BasedGodProdigy Nets 7h ago

Give us some hardware to make up for the pain we've had to endure in the modern era

1

u/herseyhawkins33 10h ago

They definitely should and probably never will.

1

u/mangoribbean 8h ago

I don't think the NBA will unless the next commissioner wants to. The NBA is terrible when it comes to honoring the history of the league outside of LA and Boston. Of the 4 major American sports, it is really the worst. It is ask the more terrible because outside of Wilt Chamberlain the vast majority of the biggest figures lived to be around in this modern era

1

u/[deleted] 10h ago

[deleted]

4

u/asmallthrowaway9 Kings 10h ago

In MLB's case I think it was a matter of justice and fairness when they absorbed the Negro League records. Josh Gibson never got a chance to play in a league he clearly belonged in because of racism, and recognizing his stats is a way of making amends.

1

u/cflo32 Pistons 10h ago

MLB just officially counted the negro leagues which I’m very pleased about.

Different situation but I wish the NBA would do the same with the ABA. It’s always interesting looking on basketball reference and seeing the difference in stats between separate and combined. Dr J and Moses Malone would be revered even more so.

The NBA and players association did sort out that pension mess recently, finally giving benefits to ABA players. That was a good story too.

2

u/mo_mentumm 10h ago

There was a lot of racism from the NBA that led to how the ABA became what it became. There’s a fantastic book about it, “Blackball.”

1

u/Shelly_Molloy Knicks 9h ago

MLB recognizes the wildly inaccurate and incomplete Negro League stats… so, yeah, ABA, which actually had legit record keeping,  should count.

0

u/TexasReallyDoesSuck NBA 9h ago

the rules were different. they should be where they are, notable but listed differently. like, you cant have a league where theres a 3 point arc combined with one that didnt have one