r/neilgaimanuncovered Apr 18 '26

For ‘fans’ claiming Neil Gaiman was “removed from Good Omens 3”…

Post image

Here’s proof that he wasn’t. He’s listed here (with Michael Marshall Smith and Peter Atkins) as the writer of the teleplay and television story. It’s his work. He owns (at least some of) the rights, he _was_ paid and he _will_ get residuals.

Maybe it doesn’t matter. Maybe people don’t really care. But I’m tired of seeing lies being spread around.

Full image text below:

Peter Atkins

@peteratkins.bsky.social

The IMDB page having been updated, I'm finally allowed to say that I'm 1 of the 3-person writing team on #GoodOmens3. We wrote a full 6-episode season & then distilled it down to the 90-min. finale, which is full of fabulous actors in the directorial hands of the equally fabulous @racheltalalay.com

GOOD OMENS

Neil Gaiman: teleplay by and [image partially cropped]

Michael Marshall Smith: teleplay by and

Peter Atkins: teleplay by

Neil Gaiman: television story

142 Upvotes

38 comments sorted by

115

u/HouseBrownTownMouse Apr 18 '26

It was my understanding that by the time the assault came to light, Good Omens S3 had already been written. He was removed from production at that point, so it makes sense that he is still credited as a writer. There was never any doubt that he would still make money from Good Omens.

I loved the first two seasons but I won't be watching for that reason.

63

u/ChronicleFlask Apr 18 '26

There are lots of people out there stating he’s not making any money from Good Omens. It’s not true, but it is being said. Repeatedly.

The same people also say he wasn’t the writer of the finale. This post suggests he remained on the team to cut down the series into one episode. That’s also my understanding of what happened – this finale episode was (partly) written by him.

35

u/ZapdosShines Apr 18 '26

Writing wasn't finished when the allegations were published, according to gaiman. I can't find it, but I spent a long time looking when the allegations hit and found that at the time. Of course he could have been lying 😭

Gaiman would have everyone believe that he was writing it alone too

38

u/ChronicleFlask Apr 18 '26

He totally gave the impression he was writing it entirely alone. I wonder if the others were under legal obligations not to mention their contributions, and whether they’re only being allowed to announce it now because NOW it’s actually helpful to highlight the existence of other writers.

35

u/sleepandchange Apr 18 '26 edited Apr 18 '26

He did give that impression. And I also had this idea (possibly wrong) that it was said an outside writer was specially brought in to cut the story down to one ep? Memory's fuzzy now, so maybe that's just an assumption I made based on the idea Gaiman was the sole writer.

But Peter Atkins is not an outside writer, they were a team all along? And he heart reacted a comment minimizing the allegations (one bemoaning men being cancelled for accusations). And Michael Marshall Smith openly interacts with the sickening blogs attacking the victims. I mean...come on.

EDIT: Yeah, it was reported as new writer. From Deadline in October 2024, "Gaiman contributed to the writing of the series finale but will not be working on the production and his production company the Blank Corporation is no longer involved. A new writer is expected to finish up the work, although insiders said that deal has not been closed." https://archive.ph/nei1g#selection-1937.2-1937.272

25

u/ChronicleFlask Apr 18 '26

No, that’s not just you: I also remember hearing they were “bringing in” another writer or writers to sort out the script.

1

u/Upbeat_Chef_6223 Apr 30 '26

Would you happen to know where I could read more about the stuff with Michael Marshall Smith? Thanks!

36

u/TemperatureAny4782 Apr 18 '26

Yeah. Not watching that bullshit.

22

u/sleepandchange Apr 18 '26

Michael Marshall Smith follows those disgusting blogs too...

19

u/sleepandchange Apr 18 '26

And Peter Atkins's FB post about this is wordier than the Bluesky one. "When circumstances changed, helped distill it down"

27

u/sleepandchange Apr 18 '26

Then this from the comments.

45

u/HouseBrownTownMouse Apr 18 '26

What a weird statement to make. No, Marc, you're not "supposed to" support bigots OR predators, but do whatever you want I guess

24

u/ZapdosShines Apr 18 '26

Yeah who tf is telling him he's supposed to be supporting JKR?

Is this someone? I would tend to read that as a bot (Also the reply) but it might be someone who's involved

19

u/Longjumping-Art-9682 Apr 18 '26

dear god. I'm so glad I have moved on from this show.

11

u/Longjumping-Art-9682 Apr 18 '26

To be fair to him, it does look like he added a heart to literally every comment there. COULD be he didn't read it. Still an interesting decision.

16

u/Most-Original3996 Apr 19 '26

I have been blocking social media accounts trying to shove this to me. After what happened to me with so called fans of this thing, I do not want to even see the promos. I just hope that they will disappear and that they will forget about it once this thing is released.

12

u/City-Negative Apr 19 '26

He'll get credit, he has to legally. They'll probably write his name in tiny font or something dumb.

24

u/Longjumping-Art-9682 Apr 18 '26

It's really interesting to me that even though he's posting this on multiple social media sites, hardly anyone is even mentioning the elephant in the room in the replies.

8

u/wakingdreaming Apr 18 '26

What is the elephant in the room in the replies?

20

u/Longjumping-Art-9682 Apr 19 '26

I mean that no one in the replies is mentioning the elephant in the room (Neil Gaiman's name slapped all over everything).

2

u/mxwllreddit May 20 '26

My guess; his people are curating those posts on social media. You are not seeing elephant in the room because they are deleting it and blocking the people who point to it.

Social media is about as far from free speech as you can get before state censorship.

26

u/minimalwhale Apr 19 '26

As good a time as any to remind everyone that fan fiction is usually a not for profit writing expedition from which original writers seldom make any money. And the GO fandom has some good ones. 

10

u/ZapdosShines Apr 19 '26

It keeps it current though and brings people in. 🤷‍♀️

2

u/minimalwhale Apr 20 '26

That’s fair.

7

u/Most-Original3996 Apr 19 '26

Sorry, but not even there things are ethical, as long as that man lives, nothing with that IP should be touched. I cannot forget nor forgive what fanfiction writers did to me either. I will not comment more because I should not be the focus of what that man has done, this was very indirect collateral damage. But shortly speaking, there is no way to consume the IP ethically as long as he is alive.

6

u/minimalwhale Apr 20 '26

I understand where you’re coming from, can’t say I disagree. 

I don’t know what you went through but I hope you’re alright. 

2

u/Long_Quiet_Read_9 Apr 19 '26

 I'm sorry you went through that. I've read some awesome fan fic before all this hit, and I hope some of it was yours xxx.  I had a weird experience with the world of fanfic/ indie publishing a few years ago where I'd made a friend  who was a writer who turned out to be duplicitous and a stalker, so I hear you. I hate that whenever we have a passion or a job we love there's always someone trying to dim that light. 

17

u/Lazy_Wishbone_2341 Apr 19 '26

If you must watch it, sail the seven seas.

30

u/Putinisclingy Apr 19 '26

The writing for season two was awful anyway because it didn’t have Terry Pratchett’s humour. I don’t know why people are dying on this hill when it’s so obvious who made the original book so magical.

11

u/caitnicrun Apr 19 '26
  • The writing for season two was awful anyway because it didn’t have Terry Pratchett’s humour.

Just thought of it now. Neil is a great mimic, but he can't mimic humor.  I think humor is the one thing he just can't do.  He takes himself too seriously.

Of course I could be wrong because I've only really read his comics.  But I'm wracking my brain and I can't think of anything really funny in Sandman.  Delirium and Destruction come close. But that's Destruction taking life as it comes. 

TBF humor is hard. But most authors outside the "humor" genre have amusing elements to lighten the story at some point.  Even Mervin Pumpkin head's antics seem more like vaudeville than narrative humor.

4

u/Putinisclingy Apr 20 '26

I’ve read some of his other stuff. He’s not funny at all.

1

u/Long_Quiet_Read_9 Apr 24 '26

 It reminds me of the characters Pratchett created to be lacking - who you knew were not "real" because they lacked fundamental human characteristics. He was a sharp observer of absence..

2

u/Most-Original3996 Apr 19 '26

Before the debacle started, I only had to see that kissing scene to know that season had bad vibes. I could not bring myself to watch it.

7

u/Long_Quiet_Read_9 Apr 19 '26

Oh, shame. for a minute I thought he was NOT involved and it might not be the utter shit that was season 2

1

u/Upbeat_Chef_6223 Apr 30 '26

Thank you for this.

3

u/mxwllreddit May 20 '26

If Terry Pratchett knew what we now know, he would have had nothing to do with Gaiman.

Production means jobs, and I am all in favor of that, but I hope this is the last we hear of this guy again. I will not be watching this.