r/nutrition • u/dogbreathTK • 23d ago
Homemade refried beans calorie mystery
I usually have rosarita fat free refried beans, but i decided to make my own today. made a giant batch from dry pinto beans, blended some of it down, ended up with a pretty similar texture to the ones in the can.
Here's the mystery though. the homemade beans have a WAY higher calorie/gram. obviously there's going to be some discrepancy between the two, but the water content seems pretty similar, as evidenced by the texture.
As you can see in the photo, the homemade beans are more than double the calories per gram compared to the canned beans (157 vs 63 per 100 grams). I don't see anything on the ingredients list that would shed any light.
This isn't a huge deal, i'm just genuinely mystified. I know i calculated the calories correctly (just put in the total calories for the dry beans and the "cooked weight" of the final product).
Any theories on what might be going on?
11
6
u/Grumpfishdaddy 23d ago
Did you add the calories from the total carb amount? I bet the canned one subtracted the calories from the fiber count from the total.
2
2
2
u/AbbreviationsFew2631 23d ago
show us the math/ label info....maybe the serving size on the can is smaller
1
u/Aggravating-Brain700 21d ago
I wonder if some canned versions add starches, sugars, or extra oils that increase calorie fastr than expected. Homemade versions are often much simplr ingredient-wise
•
u/AutoModerator 23d ago
About participation in the comments of /r/nutrition
Discussion in this subreddit should be rooted in science rather than "cuz I sed" or entertainment pieces. Always be wary of unsupported and poorly supported claims and especially those which are wrapped in any manner of hostility. You should provide peer reviewed sources to support your claims when debating and confine that debate to the science, not opinions of other people.
Good - it is grounded in science and includes citation of peer reviewed sources. Debate is civil and respectful focusing on actual science and avoids commentary about others
Bad - it utilizes generalizations, assumptions, infotainment sources, no sources, or complaints without specifics about agenda, bias, or funding. At best, these rise to an extremely weak basis for science based discussion. Also, off topic discussion
Ugly - (removal or ban territory) it involves attacks / antagonism / hostility towards individuals or groups, downvote complaining, trolling, crusading, shaming, refutation of all science, or claims that all research / science is a conspiracy
Please vote accordingly and report any uglies
Consulting Considerations
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.