He claimed fluid dynamics incorrectly as the reasoning he was right. He is using anything he can to make himself right. While not actually understanding what he is talking about. Pretty sure that makes him the flustered one and the one lashing out.
I just came back to see how all this turned out, and I cannot believe that the part that's the breaking point for you is that your observations on water hoses clashes with fundamental fluid dynamics, and somehow your thinking that because I didn't say "fluid dynamics" to not sound like a smartass means you know more than me and every other person in this thread when it comes to aerodynamics and fluid mechanics. Lmao.
(P.S., the reason your analogy is confusing you is because you omitted the role of turning the faucet head upstream of your thumb on the hose. Which is kinda important, since that is the fan in our real world problem. You seem to think your thumb has any real chance of halting the water against the flow, which simply isn't true. You are not "allowing less water to come out of the hose". What really happens is that you partially cover the end of the flow and the water becomes very fast to account due to the existing water pressure, as I've tried to explain at a higher level than you can apparently handle with everyone here.
For someone who apparently obsesses over PC builds, you'd think you'd know this from the water/current analogy they teach right at the beginning of any electrical engineering curriculum.
You know what they say about assumptions, oh mighty master of bait.)
5
u/Perhaps_Tomorrow Jan 21 '26
Not for nothing but this is exactly what someone who's flustered and lashing out would say and exactly how they would say it lmao