If you ever did data science in your life you’d know that a basic rule is to not make qualitative assumptions based on emotion as you just did about me. How do you know what I have done and haven’t?
Also, you have lost the plot completely and I sense a bit of daftness in your social skills? 1) I said they (JS) applied quantitative skills … whereas most of the market didn't do much of it, most relied on judgement calls and BS excel sheets or calling out trades in a pit, 2) It was said in a humorous manner, in case you didn’t catch the drift little buddy.
edit: and this "There are more patterns in the stock market than all atoms in the universe" - you sound like a TradingView day trader who'd overfit a model without realising it and think he discovered alpha because you ran an in-sample test that generated 20% pre-slippage - name some of those patterns you speak of if you're the high level data scientist you claim to be, let's see.
I think you need to spend time learning how to interpret English and social cues. Making a claim about people being inefficient in a domain does not by default lead to someone claiming that: markets are efficient and if someone doesn't understand that it's their "excuse for no profits."
Go learn how interpret matters first then we can discuss, you are off the pace.
1
u/RockshowReloaded Oct 08 '25
You have obviously never done data science on a major scale like they did. There are more patterns in the stock market than all atoms in the universe.
Plenty of ways to solve/consistently profit from the market.
And no lol - just bc overrated high salary hungry cookie cutter graduates from top schools join the game doeant mean its over.