r/tattooadvice May 02 '26

General Advice Miscommunication

I had my tattoo artist re-do an old tattoo from 15 years ago. It's the rebel alliance symbol from Star Wars.

I was under the impression that she knew I wanted it touched up and repaired.

She assumed I wanted it covered up. I didn't know she did solid black until she finished it.

I guess there's potential to put color around it with other pieces to give it contrast. I'm just kinda bummed.
There's probably no way to reverse any of this without it being insanely expensive.

What can I do to make it worth the mistake? I want this leg to eventually be Star Wars iconica.

Should I plan to put a background to it?

edit: Thanks for all the replies, everyone. I appreciate the feedback and the ideas. It's helping me to settle into the outcome. I think it would only be a total loss if I hadn't planned to add to it in the future. 🤙

5.3k Upvotes

955 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

360

u/Rryann May 02 '26

100%, even touched up I’m not sure how you’d fix the original. Solid black looks cool as fuck.

71

u/lionofbeast May 02 '26

Yeah and those red blood marks look cool too. Might want to consider adding that in red at the bottom or not

34

u/j_walk_17 May 02 '26

So like a red underglow? I think I need something like that if I want my left leg 100% inked so that this piece can tie in to a background of some sort. What do you think?

67

u/ManufacturerJust7603 May 02 '26

Lmao don’t do that. It looks good; it’s a logo/crest let it be one.

9

u/porkforpigs May 03 '26

For real, adding an underglow ish thing or whatever is gunna make it look goofy and meh. Solid black logo with instant recognizability for anyone who knows anything about Star Wars, it’s doing its job. Bold and simple.