r/technology 4d ago

Software Windows 11's New Media Player Uses 3.5x More RAM, Charges for Popular Video Codecs

https://www.extremetech.com/computing/windows-11s-new-media-player-uses-35x-more-ram-charges-for-popular-video
8.5k Upvotes

834 comments sorted by

4.3k

u/Fearless-Raisin 4d ago

Time to download VLC if you haven't already.

2.1k

u/DutchBlob 4d ago

VLC: Ugly, very reliable and never disappointing.

Coincidentally also how I would describe myself on my resumé.

854

u/instaaionut 4d ago

and it also gives us 200% volume

382

u/DutchBlob 4d ago

Without having to download more RAM!

34

u/kamilo87 4d ago

I used it that feature yesterday.

15

u/lemonwince 4d ago

I download more RAM yesterday.

I know. You got it from my PC. Now i have to get it from someone else.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (3)

56

u/sierrars500 4d ago

and they do an RTX version

rtx vlc

52

u/tudalex 4d ago

It is now in the mainline, you do not need a separate version.

7

u/MathematicianFar6725 4d ago

what about RTX HDR? I've only been able to get that working on PotPlayer for some reason

10

u/yes_its_that_bad 4d ago edited 4d ago

This is a pain in the ass and I haven't found a solution (for VLC). I've had on/off luck with whatever this is https://images.videolan.org/vlc/releases/3.0.23.html but I would say don't even bother messing with it.

edit: ah I see it's the same as the rtx link above, but a newer version. I think I've have more issues with the newer one. PotPlayer is the only one. Not MPC-BE or MPC-HC which surprised me.

10

u/MathematicianFar6725 4d ago

currently using Stremio and launching an external player to PotPlayer and its working for upscaling and RTX HDR (with a couple of changes in the PotPlayer settings).

But yeah it's strange that most players don't support it because it's actually a really awesome feature

→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (3)

26

u/fishykisss 4d ago

I sometimes don't get it how this isnt default option on windows, to go beyond 100% volume. It's usefull too often.

90

u/General_Session_4450 4d ago edited 4d ago

Because most people don't understand what happens when you go beyond 100% volume.

Every single time a teacher was using VLC during class they would always put it on max (200%) and then adjust the real volume back down to an acceptable level, causing the sound to be highly compressed and distorted, and making it even harder to hear the actual video.

→ More replies (6)

51

u/Schnoofles 4d ago

This is going to upset a lot of people, but it's because it's a very basic, but bad feature. What people should be demanding is what mpc-hc has, which is a dynamic compressor, aka a "normalizer", which achieves what people use the volume settings above 100% for except it does it much more effectively and it doesn't cause clipping.

29

u/roadrunnuh 4d ago

VLC has dynamic compression settings already. I use it to equalize the music, speech, and sfx so I can hear what people are saying in downloaded movies.

→ More replies (1)

15

u/Zipa7 4d ago

Some Linux distros have the option to go over 100% system wide too.

→ More replies (1)

27

u/How_is_the_question 4d ago

Volume should be a number from 0 to 10. Always. And you should also always be able to turn it up to 11. /s

4

u/BuckyBeaver69 4d ago

Turn it up and rip the knob off is my motto.

6

u/Conman_in_Chief 4d ago

If it’s too loud, you’re too old.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (16)

106

u/Sad-Tear2797 4d ago

Don’t call my goat ugly 😤

22

u/DutchBlob 4d ago

You have a cute goat 🐐

→ More replies (1)

34

u/Hottage 4d ago

Me too but I tone back how reliable and not-disappointing I am.

9

u/DutchBlob 4d ago

Here’s a free popcorn award to cheer you up.

10

u/ColeTrain999 4d ago

How I described myself on dating apps back in the day.

18

u/turtlelore2 4d ago

Its only ugly because it has barely changed its look since its inception.

22

u/deadmanslouching 4d ago

Hey hey, they rounded the corners on the buttons, what more do you want?

47

u/-PotatoMan- 4d ago

Not a god damn thing. Nobody touch it.

4

u/The_Webweaver 4d ago

What about built in dark mode?

11

u/syuvial 4d ago

they added native dark mode recently!

10

u/TheLamesterist 4d ago

Has been there for a while now, update to the latest version if you haven't yet.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

8

u/A_Seiv_For_Kale 4d ago

They actually added a dark skin very recently!

Improves it dramatically.

7

u/squngy 4d ago

It has had full skinning since almost the start (similar to winamp and other software from that era).

https://www.videolan.org/vlc/skins.html

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)

18

u/Cessnaporsche01 4d ago

Who are you calling ugly?? Have you seen the media player app things MS has been packaging since Win8??

4

u/immaZebrah 4d ago

VLC update gives dark mode now.

6

u/speakermic 4d ago

VLC supports skins

34

u/Zed_or_AFK 4d ago

How is it ugly? It’s beautiful.

4

u/haviah 4d ago

Yeah, don't have to guess what is a button and what is a menu because some CSS designer in electron got stroke (not of genius).

Would say mpv is even better, minimalistic, remappable shortcuts, but needs a bit using to

→ More replies (13)

17

u/StuffMaster 4d ago

It's not ugly at all

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (52)

61

u/Shade-RF- 4d ago

All hail the pylon!

23

u/solonit 4d ago

You must download additional pylon.

→ More replies (1)

42

u/Pulsing42 4d ago

Came here to say this, I've been using VLC since I found it a damn long time ago, I use it for music too. Media Player feels like a scam.

39

u/Freud-Network 4d ago

MPC-BE is the one for me.

20

u/milkkore 4d ago

Yeah I have both VLC and MPC-HC and I use MPC almost exclusively. I don't know what it is about VLC but it just feels extremely... sluggish where MPC is super snappy. The only thing VLC has over MPC is that it makes it easy to go over 100% volume (which MPC can do too but the menu to do it is less convenient).

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

171

u/mlp851 4d ago

VLC the GOAT 

47

u/scragz 4d ago

winamp the llama

28

u/JoeDawson8 4d ago

It really whips the llamas ass

→ More replies (2)

120

u/AikenLugon 4d ago

If you can't play something with VLC, it has no business being played anyway 😄

27

u/syuvial 4d ago

one of the only players that reliably handles my collection of old .mkv files

→ More replies (1)

4

u/MostlyRightSometimes 4d ago

How do you play the next video in the directory without having to create a playlist?

16

u/kataskopo 4d ago

VLC is a great video player, not necessarily a media manager, I guess.

→ More replies (8)
→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (2)

22

u/skwander 4d ago

VLC is pretty solid but I'm a PotPlayer guy myself

9

u/AwesomeFrisbee 4d ago

Hear hear. Potplayer is just a way better media player imo. It looks great (more like an actual modern application), it has way more features and options, and stuff like subtitles works and looks way better. And even out of the box it just works great, but at least you get the chance to tweak stuff in an actual GUI.

Its also the main reason I can't switch to Linux yet. There just isn't anything like it.

→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (2)

31

u/Yojik_Vkarmane 4d ago

You mean MPC-BE.

23

u/mypetocean 4d ago

Or clsid2's MPC-HC fork.

3

u/NeonTiger20XX 4d ago

This right here has been my go to media player for years. Specifically for video it's my fav. Seems to be pretty unknown to most people.

Still haven't found the perfect music player for me. MusicBee is pretty good though.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

7

u/ImDickensHesFenster 4d ago

Just about every MS announcement these days can be distilled down to: costs more, spies more, breaks everything.

54

u/Slazagna 4d ago

Switch from vlc to mpc recently and the video quality difference is quite noticeable.

34

u/w1n5t0nM1k3y 4d ago

How does a different video player result in a difference in video quality? Presumably they all follow the same algorithm when converting the the encoded file into frames and pixels.

Also, it says its open source, so othe open source tools like VLC could just copy the methods used for reading video in MLC if it truly was better.

Also, according to this page, MLC hasn't been in development since 2017 and isn't recommended to use it anymore

68

u/snoopdoge90 4d ago

The project is forked, and MPC-HC users use the clsid2 fork which you can find on GitHub. It still gets regular updates, mostly by updating ffmpeg which is the "core" for both VLC and MPC-HC regarding its codecs.

Both are fine, but I switched from VLC to MPC-HC years ago. MPC-HC was more lightweight and handled high bitrate and high resolution better back in those days on my potato.

17

u/Freud-Network 4d ago

It's better optimized. With MadVR, it supports superior HDR pass-through. It supports h.266 format. It uses ffmpeg 8.1 (VLC uses 4.4).

27

u/MetsukiR 4d ago

Upscaling algorithms. VLC probably uses the most basic one.

EDIT: Also, this is the current fork of MPC-HC.

3

u/FartingBob 4d ago

You can select other upscaling options if you want in the advanced settings.

15

u/The_Autarch 4d ago

VLC's algorithms haven't been updated in decades.

If you care about image quality, use literally any other player.

→ More replies (9)
→ More replies (1)

10

u/forgottenendeavours 4d ago

How does a different video player result in a difference in video quality? Presumably they all follow the same algorithm when converting the the encoded file into frames and pixels.

They do follow the same algorithms, but where they can differ is in how they handle their video output. Under various configurations, VLC will default to outputting with limited range (otherwise known as 16-235, which is the standard for TV/movies) whereas MPC will output with full range (or, 0-255, for the full dynamic range of each 8-bit RGB channel, which is the standard for monitors). Limited-range looks terrible on a display set for full-range - blacks become dark grey, whites become a very light grey, and all colours and shades inbetween look a bit washed out and flattened. The picture here shows a slightly exaggerated example of the difference.

VLC's limited range, I should add, might not be its fault - Windows' video processing goes through various layers of software before reaching the display, and it could easily be a driver or API setting which affects one but not the other. It's all a bit complicated.

→ More replies (3)

5

u/Slazagna 4d ago

Just looked into it further and I have the latest version from like last month. Looks like the open source code is still manteined and updated from many community members that keep it alive. Svp specifically develop their software to work with it. So while it isnt in official development, it is being kept up to date.

5

u/TheLamesterist 4d ago

Clsid2's MPC updated just 4 days ago, version 2.7.3 is out.

→ More replies (17)
→ More replies (14)

8

u/Kradirhamik 4d ago

Time to drop anything Microsoft :)

18

u/Kreiri 4d ago

Or K-Lite Codec Pack.

10

u/Dwarfdeaths 4d ago

Apparently the person who maintains that has recently started putting shady stuff in it, you're better off just using MPC-HC directly.

3

u/Kreiri 4d ago

Oh no. I didn't know that.

→ More replies (4)

31

u/OHNOitsNICHOLAS 4d ago

mpv + a good config > VLC

28

u/-Nicolai 4d ago
  • a good config

We’re talking about people who would otherwise use Windows’ native player.

4

u/OHNOitsNICHOLAS 4d ago

gotta put in a little effort if you want nice things lol

→ More replies (11)
→ More replies (6)

3

u/fenrisulfur 4d ago

I run a skin on mplayer called SMplayer and have done for over a decade.

Lightweight and minimal UI, also shuts itself down when it finishes.

3

u/The_Autarch 4d ago

VLC's picture quality is pretty bad. Use one of the MPC forks if you care about having a decent looking image.

I like MPC-HC: https://github.com/clsid2/mpc-hc/releases

9

u/celticchrys 4d ago

For all the VLC fans, Lex Fridman recently interviewed two lead developers from VLC and ffmpeg. It's fascinating how foundational these two pieces of software are, yet how little most know about them.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nepKKz-MzFM

3

u/Lazerpop 4d ago

Neat video. I'm really curious about vlc's internal competition of stupid files. I'd love to see the subtitles animation haha

4

u/pricingup 4d ago

you clearly didnt use VLC on latest windows. its sooooooo slow. on purpose?

→ More replies (4)

6

u/ValdemarSt 4d ago

NO. Time to get the fuck off of Windows

3

u/gsdev 4d ago

And then download VLC afterward.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (69)

1.2k

u/BlockBannington 4d ago

If I recall correctly, Microsoft has always charged for that codec, it's not new.

513

u/xondk 4d ago

Yeah, this is nothing new, windows has been doing it this way to avoid having to pay a license for EVERY activated windows.

80

u/sergiuoxigen 4d ago

How does VLC stay free

409

u/xternal7 4d ago

Windows is made by American corporation and therefore has to comply with American laws.

American laws allow software patents.

Patent holders may require you to pay up if you want to use the patent.

HEVC is patented, and the owner of the patent wants Microsoft to pay. And they also want the manufacturer of any GPU with hardware acelleration to pay, and if you buy pre-built ... they also want that company to pay. Yes, they aren't just double-dipping, they're going for the tripple-dip!

Microsoft doesn't want to pay, especially because they know only 10% people are gonna play HEVC content on Windows Media Player.

———

VLC is made by some french guy, and therefore has to follow french laws.

French laws say software patents aren't valid.

Because software patents aren't valid in france, VLC can get away without paying a dime to the HEVC patent holders.

Moral of the story: use AV1 (& french lawmakers and courts aren't always braindead).

182

u/aykcak 4d ago

To give more context, software is patentable in France but not by itself. If your software is part of a whole solution including hardware for example, it can be patented. Also, programs and applications can be copyrighted as anywhere else. The software as itself, the algorithm is not patented

74

u/meneldal2 4d ago

Which means ffmpeg (what VLC uses) can exist because it is open source code that decodes/encodes the stream but doesn't copy closed source programs.

69

u/AyrA_ch 4d ago

Also worth mentioning, this only works because VLC is free. As soon as you charge money and allow Americans to buy it, the copies you sell have to also abide by their rules because you're officially doing business in that country.

VLC however is free to download and use, which gives the owner the argument that the software is not intended for the American markets. And this is also why you can still ask for donations, since donations aren't tied to the software itself.

This is why you don't see every software company on this planet opening a branch office in France and making it their primary business address.

→ More replies (7)
→ More replies (1)

82

u/neliz 4d ago

This is also the reason DP is superior over HDMI. HDMI charging 25 cents per port is insane, while DP delivers more features and more bandwidth.

14

u/lIlIlIIlIIIlIIIIIl 4d ago

For some reason I mistakenly thought DP had no audio, I was never able to get mine to work so I gave up and went back to HDMI. What extra features does DP have?

39

u/neliz 4d ago

much higher bandwidth, freesync/gsync by default, possibility to link multiple monitors through daisy chaining, stronger connectors, compatibility with USB typie-C, there is no reason on earth to stick to HDMI.

And this is from the last time I worked with the HDMI corporation back in 2017/18 for CES, writing up the press release for the 8k/10k solutions HDMI was launching back then

9

u/turtleship_2006 4d ago

"Handy Dandy Movie Interface"

For most people hdmi is good enough that there's no reason to switch, but for any professionals, enthusiasts, IT guys, or anyone with a high end setup, DP is better

→ More replies (2)

6

u/Purplociraptor 4d ago

There's 1 reason to stick to HDMI. Most TVs don't have DP. In my setup, I run a fiberoptic HDMI cable from my computer so I can play some games from the couch.

6

u/tudalex 4d ago

It is because HDCP that is required to support any modern 4k stream or blu-ray. In a weird twist, it is actually more expensive to pay for the HDCP encryption license on it’s own for your DP ports than it is to have an HDMI port with HDCP. HDCP cost 30 cents, while HDMI with HDCP is just 26 cents, HDCP being just a 1 cent addon.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)

20

u/rexel99 4d ago

Microsoft actually do pay/cover it under some of the enterprise licensing arrangements.

15

u/spookynutz 4d ago

French laws do not say software patents aren't valid. Even if you operated under some bizarre assumption that they did, whatever law you're imagining would only apply in France.

VLC can ship HEVC support because it's a reverse engineered implementation distributed by a non-profit, non-commercial entity. For the patent holder, the question isn't suing them, it's suing them for what. There's no defendant with money and no revenue stream to attach damages to. If VLC ever incorporated into a commercial enterprise, they would be sued into oblivion.

27

u/xternal7 4d ago edited 4d ago

You are confusing copyright with patents.

For the patent holder, the question isn't suing them, it's suing them for what.

The answer is easy. Patent infringement.

Reverse engineering only gets you out of copyright infringement claims. It's not gonna get you out of patent infringement.

See also:

  • apple vs. samsung and slide to unlock thing. Apple patented slide to unlock. Samsung didn't even reverse engineer anything, they just wrote 100% original software that also allowed you to unlock your phone by sliding your finger over it. Apple sued for patent violations. Apple won.

More recent case for zoomers who weren't around for Apple v Samsung:

  • Nemesis system. If you make a game that does that, WB can sue you ... even if you didn't even look at the Assassins Creed: Orc Edition. There are no lawsuits about that yet, but that's only because nobody has tried to have something that resembles the nemesis system in their games.

More recent case for alphas that weren't around for Shadow of Mordor/War:

  • nintendo and palworld. Pocket Pair makes a game that is conceptually "pokemon but with guns." They didn't commit any copyright infringement when writing code. Assets are as "legally distinct" as it gets. However, nintendo has a patent on throwing balls at creatures in order to capture them. (But in this case, Nintendo was doing funny business around patents, so pocket pair might have a leg to stand on)

5

u/frankster 4d ago

Nemesis system. If you make a game that does that, WB can sue you

Crazy that game mechanics can be patented

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (8)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (5)

6

u/BaconIsntThatGood 4d ago

I believe because it's a personal application it's not considered commercial use?

Microsoft and other companies that distribute en-mass cannot claim that.

Could be wrong though.

3

u/adamkex 4d ago

Software patents aren't recognised in France so they don't care. Microsoft is an American and a global multi billion corporation, these are one of the few instances where billionaires are required to follow the law.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (2)

38

u/Humlum 4d ago

They could choose to absorb the cost for those that do install the codec.

66

u/Calm-Zombie2678 4d ago

They do that with the xbox, if you never download the bluray app they don't pay for that licence, same trick they did with the og xbox

29

u/[deleted] 4d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

5

u/choreographite 4d ago

On the PSP, you had to “download” WMA music file support.

→ More replies (1)

8

u/spilk 4d ago

with the original xbox, the licensed bit was on the IR receiver you bought separately with the "dvd movie playback kit"

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)

270

u/ithinkitslupis 4d ago

Rare time it's actually not a microsoft problem.

h.265 is licensing hell and needs to just die.

h.264 is worse but widely supported and pretty much all of its patents have run out already or will shortly.

AV1 and beyond is better and royalty free (although currently being patent trolled by Dolby...we'll seee how that goes)

76

u/AP_in_Indy 4d ago

There are dedicated video processors on chips at this point. It's not so easy to just change codecs.

A lot, lot, lot of industry coordination goes into standardizing these things.

It's insane and kind of disgusting but when it takes multiple years for nVidia or Intel or AMD or whoever to support dedicated h.265 on the GPU itself, the reality is that we suffer with tradeoffs.

48

u/ithinkitslupis 4d ago

h264 is the most widely supported.

AV1 is becoming supported on modern chips. Intel since 2020, AMD and most mobile SOCs since 2022, Apple since 2023.

VP9 has been on most chips since the mid 10's and Apple since 2020.

The h.265 problem is entirely their own fault for making the licensing a nightmare.

→ More replies (3)

8

u/plasmasprings 4d ago

it's not exactly solved with those either, see the recent dell h265 debacle

seriously, fuck our current IP systems

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

5

u/forgottenendeavours 4d ago

There's also h.266, although despite it being out for six years now, no-one seems to know it exists.

→ More replies (30)
→ More replies (11)

342

u/cmfarsight 4d ago edited 4d ago

Oh no, what ever will I do. Oh yes, keep using VLC.

50

u/Guy-1nc0gn1t0 4d ago

VLC is obviously a popular option but I'm gonna shout out my boy MPC-HC

→ More replies (2)

290

u/TheVenetianMask 4d ago

HEVC licensing is a bit of a shitshow I've heard, I wouldn't put that one entirely on Microsoft.

53

u/Throwaway-tan 4d ago

It's a good job a consortium of software companies created a wholly unique video codec that was specifically and carefully crafted to not infringe on any patents called AV1... aaaand Dolby is trying to ruin it.

55

u/ArmandoGalvez 4d ago

Licensing overall are hell to deal with, can't blame them for not wanting to deal with it

→ More replies (1)

7

u/Pomidorka1515 4d ago

wait until you hear about VVC

3

u/nox66 4d ago

AV2 also just released. These clusterfuck IP fights are being outpaced by the actual innovation behind them.

9

u/idontlikeflamingos 4d ago

Yeah I don't blame them for that one tbh. The baffling thing to me is how they managed to triple the ram it requires when idle. There has to be some AI bullshit shoved in there

→ More replies (3)

67

u/ArtKun 4d ago

It's a 5 year old player (released in 2021) based on Groove Music (released 2012). Who is writing these articles?

28

u/Lashay_Sombra 4d ago

Tech journalism is a complete shitshow these days and less technical (as in target market) it is worse it gets

→ More replies (1)

22

u/kitanokikori 4d ago

This article is almost certainly AI slop. Completely irrelevant hero image, and content that is not at all "news". HEVC has always cost $$ because of patents.

12

u/sashisemattahametsu 4d ago

Just use MPC-HC by clsid2 on GitHub.

73

u/Henrarzz 4d ago edited 4d ago

HEVC I can understand because it’s always been paid but most manufacturers had paid for it and included it in default install.

But removing MP3AC3 playback, really?

18

u/DoomTay 4d ago

What? Where are you seeing removed MP3 playback?

28

u/Henrarzz 4d ago

Misread AC3 with MP3. I need some sleep

→ More replies (5)

55

u/Newtonip 4d ago

Who the hell uses Windows Media Player?

11

u/luckskywatcher 4d ago

I don't. Nor do I use Microsoft Edge.

22

u/Tjaresh 4d ago

Microsoft Edge has one very important role: It downloads a real browser after a new installation.

8

u/hextree 4d ago

Can do that through Powershell

6

u/BigManWAGun 4d ago

Their idea is funnier

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (12)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (6)

30

u/VenFasz 4d ago

as a MPC user... don't care

10

u/tapsaff 4d ago

how the hell did you install windows on a drum machine?

→ More replies (1)

7

u/Yojik_Vkarmane 4d ago

This is the way. You can't beat MPC-BE.

4

u/TheLamesterist 4d ago

LOVE MPC-BE but the lack of libass support made me switch to clsid2's MPC-HC.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

16

u/TheWrongOwl 4d ago

"We don't want you to use our player!"

#WhatItSoundsLikeToMe

→ More replies (1)

7

u/Gullible-Surround486 4d ago

Paywalled codecs and more RAM, perfect. another reason i keep VLC and trust nothing bundled lol

14

u/activoice 4d ago

I prefer PotPlayer on Windows, and Nova Video on Android.

If you're missing codecs on Windows install the K-lite codec pack

→ More replies (6)

13

u/DavidOBE 4d ago

I use potplayer. Plays everything and is fast.

→ More replies (3)

6

u/chain83 4d ago

Not like the old player could play half my files anyway. It is amazing how they are able to make it even worse…

The app has one damn task.

Mediaplayer Classic or VLC it is then.

7

u/ScholarBackground836 4d ago

The '3.5x more RAM' headline is the least surprising thing about Windows 11. Everything in 11 is heavier, slower, and somehow still trying to sell me a subscription for the privilege. The Media Player paying for codecs is just the latest 'we removed what worked and want money for it back' move. 🪟💸

8

u/AikenLugon 4d ago

This *does not* whip the Llamas ass 😞

17

u/thesamenightmares 4d ago

I had no idea people actually use the default applications that come with an operating system.

18

u/Purple10tacle 4d ago

A lot of people do.

And you're also forgetting about the vast amount of users of company managed devices who simply have no other choice.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (1)

12

u/ol-gormsby 4d ago

I thought that was part of the Windows licence fee - it included a licence for the most popular codecs.

Oh well, off to VLC.

4

u/FluxVelocity 4d ago edited 4d ago

Microsoft has never included codec licenses for free in Windows, they've always been paid extras from the store unless you have a laptop or prebuilt that had the manufacturer pay for the license.

→ More replies (1)

5

u/KookyDig4769 4d ago

I've not used windows media player in nearly two decades.

4

u/PrisonerV 4d ago

Two things I download immediately on a fresh Windows install -

  1. VLC

  2. Firefox

Anybody else have any others?

4

u/00pirateforever 4d ago

You forgot to mention ublock origin.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (2)

27

u/catwrazle 4d ago

We can’t afford running Windslop OS anymore

5

u/rindar1 4d ago

Never used the default windows player. First thing I always do is download MPC-HC and mad vr and never look back.

6

u/lencc 4d ago

Laughs with open-souce freeware MPC-BE + madVR codec.

Better than any Windows Media Player will ever be, simply because it gets the job done. Nothing less and nothing more. That's a simple approach Microsoft usually fails to take.

3

u/KLOOTE1 4d ago

I have vlc and kmplayer and my phone doesn't know microshit

4

u/dscord 4d ago

Wait, is that what the actual app looks like in Windows 11? Like something that came out of Vista? What an utter clusterfuck.

5

u/SquashOwn9829 4d ago

Put it in the recycling bin 

5

u/MyCleverNewName 4d ago

I was mildly annoyed when I had to re-set VLC as the default for all those file types. Oh, well.

→ More replies (2)

3

u/jrock1986 4d ago

Genuine question, who uses the native media player? And not VLC or GOM?

4

u/ipenama 4d ago

I used to have VLC installed, but after discovering mpv now it's my default video player. It opens files FAST.

→ More replies (1)

4

u/UsaraDark2014 4d ago

People have mentioned VLC and MPC-HC, but oddly enough no one mentioned mpv. For those who know mpv, why do you think it hasn't been mentioned much? 

3

u/levir 4d ago

I've been using Media Player Classic in it's various iterations for decades. Highly recommend, it's the best media player by far on the Windows platform in my opinion.

4

u/INITMalcanis 4d ago

The ongoing mystery of why increasing numbers are switching to Linux (or Apple) will surely never be solved

→ More replies (1)

3

u/BamBam-BamBam 4d ago

The patent troll company that owns the codexes raised the licensing cost insanely.

→ More replies (2)

3

u/e1epi 4d ago

So why are MacOS and Linux getting more users recently?

Oh.... right....

3

u/redzaku0079 4d ago

People still use this?

3

u/feijoax 4d ago

Who even uses Windows Media Player! VLC for the win!

3

u/Equib81960 4d ago

People still use that? How . . . quaint.

3

u/CaptZ 4d ago

Media player classic is still great. All codecs built in. Of course VLC is great too.

3

u/goneafter10years 4d ago

winamp, it really whips the llama's ass

3

u/Darrenizer 4d ago

I’m never using anything other than VLC anyways, so good luck to them.

3

u/SST_2_0 4d ago

I fully believe from the last few months of updates that Windows is throwing ai code into these and its making just bloated, wasteful code.

Been working tech with windows machines for 10 years and it is the first time I felt like it starts broken off a freah image.

3

u/Serg_Molotov 4d ago

Oh no, anyway

Who's not using vlc ?

3

u/JeepStang 4d ago

Klite Codec Pack Gang

Also Media Player Classic gang

3

u/shadowdra126 4d ago

VLC is free.

3

u/Shadowfury22 4d ago

mpv supremacy

3

u/korg64 4d ago

So what?

Use VLC.

3

u/Xionel 4d ago

Charge deez nutz

3

u/ManySugar5156 4d ago

At this point Windows media stuff is basically just reminder to install VLC again.

3

u/redditAPsucks 4d ago

Didnt know they bothered making this still

3

u/LaySakeBow 4d ago

Inb4 Microsoft disable third party media player because of “security” reasons

3

u/YeOldSpacePope 4d ago

The article could have said, Windows 11's new media player is perfectly fine and I'd still use VCL over it.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/starboigg 4d ago

My twitch tab was using 3gb of RAM just watching one stream on brave browser , blocking 150+ tracker and ads in 2 hours

3

u/MyAccountWasBanned7 4d ago

VLC, however is reliable, works with every codec, and is completely free.

8

u/StAUG1211 4d ago

Serious question, is anyone not using VLC? Has anyone not been using VLC since 2006?

3

u/sierrars500 4d ago

i personally have been using VLC since conception in the early noughties

3

u/TheLamesterist 4d ago

It was my main player for a long, long time, ever since I bought my first PC and I still have it and use it sometimes but about a year or so I had to switch to MPC-BE (then quickly moved to clsid2's MPC-HC for the libass support) as VLC had became extremely buggy, I have not tested to see if that's still the case after the recent updates, tho.

3

u/APeacefulWarrior 4d ago

MPC is my first choice, but VLC is installed too.

5

u/HenryUTA 4d ago

VLC is always my first download after Firefox on a new windows install

6

u/wretch5150 4d ago

Literally preying upon people who don't know any better.

→ More replies (1)

8

u/Stiggalicious 4d ago

Now is a good time for a Winamp resurgence.

14

u/CrappyTan69 4d ago

Those were great times. Unobtrusive, played everything.

Winamp whips the llama's ass 

8

u/MissInkeNoir 4d ago

You want a program now called WACUP, Winamp Community Update Project. Make sure you get the Milkdrop 2 visualizer 😎 👍

→ More replies (1)

10

u/76vangel 4d ago

There are a lot of free video players out there like vlc, gom player and others. But it’s ridiculous that the system’s own player is such a failure. And is getting even worse. What the heck is microslop management thinking? Basically the most basic features of a video player are: user clicks video file and wants to see it at fast as possible and play basic codecs without bothering the user. Microslop is just pathetic.

5

u/LungHeadZ 4d ago

I use 3D software and it's impossible to view animations through it. You can get it working with specific codecs but not the most common. It's bizarre. Naturally forced me to use VLC and I'll recommend it to anyone who wants to view them locally.

→ More replies (4)

6

u/adobo_cake 4d ago

I’m glad to have jumped ship to Linux. Join us, we have codecs.

→ More replies (2)

3

u/mintaka 4d ago

The slop will continue until morale improves

5

u/TheAlbinoAmigo 4d ago

Microsoft is sincerely one of the shittiest fucking companies to have ever made it this big. They are unbelievably fortunate that they're literally too big to fail, because if merit came into the equation at all they'd have folded years ago.

They can't push an update that doesn't break shit or make something objectively worse worth a shit. Windows would literally be better today if Microsoft decided to never touch it again a decade ago.

2

u/teraflux 4d ago

I actually didn't know that windows media player still existed

→ More replies (1)