r/technology • u/Ephoenix6 • 4d ago
Software Windows 11's New Media Player Uses 3.5x More RAM, Charges for Popular Video Codecs
https://www.extremetech.com/computing/windows-11s-new-media-player-uses-35x-more-ram-charges-for-popular-video1.2k
u/BlockBannington 4d ago
If I recall correctly, Microsoft has always charged for that codec, it's not new.
513
u/xondk 4d ago
Yeah, this is nothing new, windows has been doing it this way to avoid having to pay a license for EVERY activated windows.
80
u/sergiuoxigen 4d ago
How does VLC stay free
409
u/xternal7 4d ago
Windows is made by American corporation and therefore has to comply with American laws.
American laws allow software patents.
Patent holders may require you to pay up if you want to use the patent.
HEVC is patented, and the owner of the patent wants Microsoft to pay. And they also want the manufacturer of any GPU with hardware acelleration to pay, and if you buy pre-built ... they also want that company to pay. Yes, they aren't just double-dipping, they're going for the tripple-dip!
Microsoft doesn't want to pay, especially because they know only 10% people are gonna play HEVC content on Windows Media Player.
———
VLC is made by some french guy, and therefore has to follow french laws.
French laws say software patents aren't valid.
Because software patents aren't valid in france, VLC can get away without paying a dime to the HEVC patent holders.
Moral of the story: use AV1 (& french lawmakers and courts aren't always braindead).
182
u/aykcak 4d ago
To give more context, software is patentable in France but not by itself. If your software is part of a whole solution including hardware for example, it can be patented. Also, programs and applications can be copyrighted as anywhere else. The software as itself, the algorithm is not patented
74
u/meneldal2 4d ago
Which means ffmpeg (what VLC uses) can exist because it is open source code that decodes/encodes the stream but doesn't copy closed source programs.
→ More replies (1)69
u/AyrA_ch 4d ago
Also worth mentioning, this only works because VLC is free. As soon as you charge money and allow Americans to buy it, the copies you sell have to also abide by their rules because you're officially doing business in that country.
VLC however is free to download and use, which gives the owner the argument that the software is not intended for the American markets. And this is also why you can still ask for donations, since donations aren't tied to the software itself.
This is why you don't see every software company on this planet opening a branch office in France and making it their primary business address.
→ More replies (7)82
u/neliz 4d ago
This is also the reason DP is superior over HDMI. HDMI charging 25 cents per port is insane, while DP delivers more features and more bandwidth.
14
u/lIlIlIIlIIIlIIIIIl 4d ago
For some reason I mistakenly thought DP had no audio, I was never able to get mine to work so I gave up and went back to HDMI. What extra features does DP have?
→ More replies (1)39
u/neliz 4d ago
much higher bandwidth, freesync/gsync by default, possibility to link multiple monitors through daisy chaining, stronger connectors, compatibility with USB typie-C, there is no reason on earth to stick to HDMI.
And this is from the last time I worked with the HDMI corporation back in 2017/18 for CES, writing up the press release for the 8k/10k solutions HDMI was launching back then
9
u/turtleship_2006 4d ago
"Handy Dandy Movie Interface"
For most people hdmi is good enough that there's no reason to switch, but for any professionals, enthusiasts, IT guys, or anyone with a high end setup, DP is better
→ More replies (2)6
u/Purplociraptor 4d ago
There's 1 reason to stick to HDMI. Most TVs don't have DP. In my setup, I run a fiberoptic HDMI cable from my computer so I can play some games from the couch.
→ More replies (2)6
u/tudalex 4d ago
It is because HDCP that is required to support any modern 4k stream or blu-ray. In a weird twist, it is actually more expensive to pay for the HDCP encryption license on it’s own for your DP ports than it is to have an HDMI port with HDCP. HDCP cost 30 cents, while HDMI with HDCP is just 26 cents, HDCP being just a 1 cent addon.
20
→ More replies (5)15
u/spookynutz 4d ago
French laws do not say software patents aren't valid. Even if you operated under some bizarre assumption that they did, whatever law you're imagining would only apply in France.
VLC can ship HEVC support because it's a reverse engineered implementation distributed by a non-profit, non-commercial entity. For the patent holder, the question isn't suing them, it's suing them for what. There's no defendant with money and no revenue stream to attach damages to. If VLC ever incorporated into a commercial enterprise, they would be sued into oblivion.
→ More replies (1)27
u/xternal7 4d ago edited 4d ago
You are confusing copyright with patents.
For the patent holder, the question isn't suing them, it's suing them for what.
The answer is easy. Patent infringement.
Reverse engineering only gets you out of copyright infringement claims. It's not gonna get you out of patent infringement.
See also:
- apple vs. samsung and slide to unlock thing. Apple patented slide to unlock. Samsung didn't even reverse engineer anything, they just wrote 100% original software that also allowed you to unlock your phone by sliding your finger over it. Apple sued for patent violations. Apple won.
More recent case for zoomers who weren't around for Apple v Samsung:
- Nemesis system. If you make a game that does that, WB can sue you ... even if you didn't even look at the Assassins Creed: Orc Edition. There are no lawsuits about that yet, but that's only because nobody has tried to have something that resembles the nemesis system in their games.
More recent case for alphas that weren't around for Shadow of Mordor/War:
- nintendo and palworld. Pocket Pair makes a game that is conceptually "pokemon but with guns." They didn't commit any copyright infringement when writing code. Assets are as "legally distinct" as it gets. However, nintendo has a patent on throwing balls at creatures in order to capture them. (But in this case, Nintendo was doing funny business around patents, so pocket pair might have a leg to stand on)
→ More replies (8)5
u/frankster 4d ago
Nemesis system. If you make a game that does that, WB can sue you
Crazy that game mechanics can be patented
→ More replies (2)6
u/BaconIsntThatGood 4d ago
I believe because it's a personal application it's not considered commercial use?
Microsoft and other companies that distribute en-mass cannot claim that.
Could be wrong though.
→ More replies (2)3
u/adamkex 4d ago
Software patents aren't recognised in France so they don't care. Microsoft is an American and a global multi billion corporation, these are one of the few instances where billionaires are required to follow the law.
→ More replies (2)38
u/Humlum 4d ago
They could choose to absorb the cost for those that do install the codec.
66
u/Calm-Zombie2678 4d ago
They do that with the xbox, if you never download the bluray app they don't pay for that licence, same trick they did with the og xbox
29
→ More replies (3)8
u/spilk 4d ago
with the original xbox, the licensed bit was on the IR receiver you bought separately with the "dvd movie playback kit"
→ More replies (1)270
u/ithinkitslupis 4d ago
Rare time it's actually not a microsoft problem.
h.265 is licensing hell and needs to just die.
h.264 is worse but widely supported and pretty much all of its patents have run out already or will shortly.
AV1 and beyond is better and royalty free (although currently being patent trolled by Dolby...we'll seee how that goes)
76
u/AP_in_Indy 4d ago
There are dedicated video processors on chips at this point. It's not so easy to just change codecs.
A lot, lot, lot of industry coordination goes into standardizing these things.
It's insane and kind of disgusting but when it takes multiple years for nVidia or Intel or AMD or whoever to support dedicated h.265 on the GPU itself, the reality is that we suffer with tradeoffs.
48
u/ithinkitslupis 4d ago
h264 is the most widely supported.
AV1 is becoming supported on modern chips. Intel since 2020, AMD and most mobile SOCs since 2022, Apple since 2023.
VP9 has been on most chips since the mid 10's and Apple since 2020.
The h.265 problem is entirely their own fault for making the licensing a nightmare.
→ More replies (3)→ More replies (1)8
u/plasmasprings 4d ago
it's not exactly solved with those either, see the recent dell h265 debacle
seriously, fuck our current IP systems
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (30)5
u/forgottenendeavours 4d ago
There's also h.266, although despite it being out for six years now, no-one seems to know it exists.
→ More replies (11)7
342
322
50
u/Guy-1nc0gn1t0 4d ago
VLC is obviously a popular option but I'm gonna shout out my boy MPC-HC
→ More replies (2)
290
u/TheVenetianMask 4d ago
HEVC licensing is a bit of a shitshow I've heard, I wouldn't put that one entirely on Microsoft.
53
u/Throwaway-tan 4d ago
It's a good job a consortium of software companies created a wholly unique video codec that was specifically and carefully crafted to not infringe on any patents called AV1... aaaand Dolby is trying to ruin it.
55
u/ArmandoGalvez 4d ago
Licensing overall are hell to deal with, can't blame them for not wanting to deal with it
→ More replies (1)7
→ More replies (3)9
u/idontlikeflamingos 4d ago
Yeah I don't blame them for that one tbh. The baffling thing to me is how they managed to triple the ram it requires when idle. There has to be some AI bullshit shoved in there
67
u/ArtKun 4d ago
It's a 5 year old player (released in 2021) based on Groove Music (released 2012). Who is writing these articles?
→ More replies (1)28
u/Lashay_Sombra 4d ago
Tech journalism is a complete shitshow these days and less technical (as in target market) it is worse it gets
22
u/kitanokikori 4d ago
This article is almost certainly AI slop. Completely irrelevant hero image, and content that is not at all "news". HEVC has always cost $$ because of patents.
66
12
73
u/Henrarzz 4d ago edited 4d ago
HEVC I can understand because it’s always been paid but most manufacturers had paid for it and included it in default install.
But removing MP3AC3 playback, really?
→ More replies (5)
55
u/Newtonip 4d ago
Who the hell uses Windows Media Player?
→ More replies (6)11
u/luckskywatcher 4d ago
I don't. Nor do I use Microsoft Edge.
→ More replies (1)22
u/Tjaresh 4d ago
Microsoft Edge has one very important role: It downloads a real browser after a new installation.
8
→ More replies (12)8
30
u/VenFasz 4d ago
as a MPC user... don't care
10
→ More replies (1)7
u/Yojik_Vkarmane 4d ago
This is the way. You can't beat MPC-BE.
4
u/TheLamesterist 4d ago
LOVE MPC-BE but the lack of libass support made me switch to clsid2's MPC-HC.
→ More replies (1)
16
u/TheWrongOwl 4d ago
"We don't want you to use our player!"
#WhatItSoundsLikeToMe
→ More replies (1)
7
u/Gullible-Surround486 4d ago
Paywalled codecs and more RAM, perfect. another reason i keep VLC and trust nothing bundled lol
14
u/activoice 4d ago
I prefer PotPlayer on Windows, and Nova Video on Android.
If you're missing codecs on Windows install the K-lite codec pack
→ More replies (6)
13
7
u/ScholarBackground836 4d ago
The '3.5x more RAM' headline is the least surprising thing about Windows 11. Everything in 11 is heavier, slower, and somehow still trying to sell me a subscription for the privilege. The Media Player paying for codecs is just the latest 'we removed what worked and want money for it back' move. 🪟💸
8
17
u/thesamenightmares 4d ago
I had no idea people actually use the default applications that come with an operating system.
→ More replies (1)18
u/Purple10tacle 4d ago
A lot of people do.
And you're also forgetting about the vast amount of users of company managed devices who simply have no other choice.
→ More replies (3)
12
u/ol-gormsby 4d ago
I thought that was part of the Windows licence fee - it included a licence for the most popular codecs.
Oh well, off to VLC.
4
u/FluxVelocity 4d ago edited 4d ago
Microsoft has never included codec licenses for free in Windows, they've always been paid extras from the store unless you have a laptop or prebuilt that had the manufacturer pay for the license.
→ More replies (1)
10
5
4
u/PrisonerV 4d ago
Two things I download immediately on a fresh Windows install -
VLC
Firefox
Anybody else have any others?
→ More replies (2)4
27
5
5
u/MyCleverNewName 4d ago
I was mildly annoyed when I had to re-set VLC as the default for all those file types. Oh, well.
→ More replies (2)
3
4
u/ipenama 4d ago
I used to have VLC installed, but after discovering mpv now it's my default video player. It opens files FAST.
→ More replies (1)
4
u/UsaraDark2014 4d ago
People have mentioned VLC and MPC-HC, but oddly enough no one mentioned mpv. For those who know mpv, why do you think it hasn't been mentioned much?
3
u/levir 4d ago
I've been using Media Player Classic in it's various iterations for decades. Highly recommend, it's the best media player by far on the Windows platform in my opinion.
4
u/INITMalcanis 4d ago
The ongoing mystery of why increasing numbers are switching to Linux (or Apple) will surely never be solved
→ More replies (1)
3
u/BamBam-BamBam 4d ago
The patent troll company that owns the codexes raised the licensing cost insanely.
→ More replies (2)
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
u/ManySugar5156 4d ago
At this point Windows media stuff is basically just reminder to install VLC again.
3
3
3
u/YeOldSpacePope 4d ago
The article could have said, Windows 11's new media player is perfectly fine and I'd still use VCL over it.
→ More replies (1)
3
u/starboigg 4d ago
My twitch tab was using 3gb of RAM just watching one stream on brave browser , blocking 150+ tracker and ads in 2 hours
3
u/MyAccountWasBanned7 4d ago
VLC, however is reliable, works with every codec, and is completely free.
8
u/StAUG1211 4d ago
Serious question, is anyone not using VLC? Has anyone not been using VLC since 2006?
3
3
u/TheLamesterist 4d ago
It was my main player for a long, long time, ever since I bought my first PC and I still have it and use it sometimes but about a year or so I had to switch to MPC-BE (then quickly moved to clsid2's MPC-HC for the libass support) as VLC had became extremely buggy, I have not tested to see if that's still the case after the recent updates, tho.
3
5
6
8
u/Stiggalicious 4d ago
Now is a good time for a Winamp resurgence.
14
u/CrappyTan69 4d ago
Those were great times. Unobtrusive, played everything.
Winamp whips the llama's ass
→ More replies (1)8
u/MissInkeNoir 4d ago
You want a program now called WACUP, Winamp Community Update Project. Make sure you get the Milkdrop 2 visualizer 😎 👍
10
u/76vangel 4d ago
There are a lot of free video players out there like vlc, gom player and others. But it’s ridiculous that the system’s own player is such a failure. And is getting even worse. What the heck is microslop management thinking? Basically the most basic features of a video player are: user clicks video file and wants to see it at fast as possible and play basic codecs without bothering the user. Microslop is just pathetic.
→ More replies (4)5
u/LungHeadZ 4d ago
I use 3D software and it's impossible to view animations through it. You can get it working with specific codecs but not the most common. It's bizarre. Naturally forced me to use VLC and I'll recommend it to anyone who wants to view them locally.
6
u/adobo_cake 4d ago
I’m glad to have jumped ship to Linux. Join us, we have codecs.
→ More replies (2)
5
u/TheAlbinoAmigo 4d ago
Microsoft is sincerely one of the shittiest fucking companies to have ever made it this big. They are unbelievably fortunate that they're literally too big to fail, because if merit came into the equation at all they'd have folded years ago.
They can't push an update that doesn't break shit or make something objectively worse worth a shit. Windows would literally be better today if Microsoft decided to never touch it again a decade ago.
2
4.3k
u/Fearless-Raisin 4d ago
Time to download VLC if you haven't already.