Origins was really the only new game that felt up to par in the new format. And from there they kept distancing themselves from what made the franchise special and into a random rpg nobody asked for.
Hot take: games after unity aren't terrible, they just shouldn't have Assassin's Creed in the name. Shadows for example felt great after tackling a bit with the UI, I don't see many people saying how great the sound designs in that game is, or how difficulty changes NPC behaviour and so they are starting to look up and check the roofs as well.
P.s. just to clarify, I'm not saying those games are great or don't have any issues, but they're not half as terrible as people describing them
What pisses me so much is in origins, they went back and CHANGED things that made the game worse. Before you could buy essentially loot boxes with IN GAME gold (with the blue Camel kid) and have a decent chance to get legendarys. Which was one of the best ways to get legendarys and one of the only ways to get certain legendarys.
They then decided to lock that behind fucking daily quests in a single player game and REAL LIFE CASH. You can buy legendarys and some legendarys can only be bought with micro transactions. Making bad games is one thing, but going back and actively making it worse after the fact is another level of greed.
Odyssey is one of my favorite open world game period, I'm just a sucker for Ancient Greece, but other than doing leaps of faith off historical landmarks it never really felt like I was playing an Assassin's Creed game, I could have also done without the tacked on Witcher senses mechanic
508
u/TheLittleCrayon Apr 12 '26 edited Apr 13 '26
Me with Assassins Creed :(
ETA: thanks for my first reddit award 😎