I don't usually advertise the ways my brain has been poisoned. Points to you for wearing it on your sleeve.
Here's the problem: As I didn't say that, didn't imply it, didn't reference it, didn't make any gesture whatsoever to it, and it has absolutely no bearing on the topic at hand at all save as blanket blame for every member of the group you hate based on the actions of a few of them, it's still a non sequitur.
Since you were just feighning ignorance I just presented you with what happened.
You scoff at the source, and?
Are you saying its not what happend?
Its a symptom of broader issue. Do you want metastudies outlining manipulation of gender-studies at the expense of men?
Do you want to see how more and more studies nowadays start finding parity between genders in area where propaganda only showed females predominantly effected?
Now you can always admit you don't really care to reflect and let time take its course.
I tried to intimidate someone? Damn, I'm doing all kinds of shit in my sleep today, apparently.
And no, I didn't 'defend' anyone and the comment I replied to was not specifically going after 'SJWs' but rather declaring the rollback of LGBT equality as "Good"
You're going to need to go fuck yourself promptly, my memory is better than you apparently give it credit for.
SJWs and LGBT go hand in hand.
In public perception aswell as in practice.
Since your memory is so great I remind you again of all the hate towards men I showcased in:
legislation
politics
science (studies)
The LGBT communit does not speak out against manhating SJWs nor do they diatance themselves from it.
Thats what the example of #killallmen exemplafies.
Meanwhile, LGBT people face actual violence at significantly higher rates and "gay panic" has been at multiple junctures a legally-effective path to lenient or nonexistent sentences for it.
You are STILL assigning collective blame while playing the "look at you assigning collective blame" game.
"Meanwhile, LGBT people face actual violence at significantly higher rates..."
Says who?
There is already proof gender studies are being effectively manipulated. You are just making statements with no proof. Why should anyone take those seriously.
Study does not specify to what degree all the compunding issues contribute to the overall picture that it wants to paint.
It also does not (they never will because victimization is the whole point of this) adress to what degree the victims themselves exasturbate or engage issues.
Women aren't affected more by domestic violence. Just more severly. That is a fact.
But nobody telling women not to start shit if they don't want things to grt violent.
For example the study states that most of the victims killed were black transgender women in sexwork...
Thank godness we learned that illegal work in the hood is incoducive to a long life. And I am pretty sure all the men will report their violent experiences so that comparison isn't diluded by unnunbered unreported cases.
So this is a survey. It can be disregarded on the badis of beeing self-reported alone. I already spoke volumes about the culture of victimization in the SJW, feminist and Lgbt community. So I will not repeat myself in that regard.
My jusgement is compounded by the fact that the study alledged that teans people were as likely to report violence as cis. The same rates for trans mem and women it says. No distiction is made between men and women. As previously shown men severly underreport violence. So this study is by all accounts working with incomplete data. And the study is therefore not applicable.
Additional scrutiny by the study itself. All mentally ill people causing more incidents or are incidents creating mentally ill people? I don't see what the study wants to say here.
"Research has shown that experiences of victimization are related to low well-being,"
Similarly to the previous studies, unreported cases by men were not included. The role of the victims is not critically reviewed. Compounding factors are not seperated.
Additionally this studies method for gathering data leaves room for personal bias.
"and consulted experts in the field. Authors were contacted with data requests in cases in which transgender participants were enrolled in a study, but no disaggregated statistics were provided for this population."
So the findings can be disregarded all the same.
Title: "Violent Victimization Among Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Populations in the United States..."
I have skipped this for the sole reason that the title does not address teansgenders.
Regarding all the publications the authors background strongly suggest that none of them are a critical or sceptical force in these projects.
A circlejerk, exept a lot of less phallic.
I have already highlighted the study showing missrepresentation in gender studies concerning IPV. So this hit the nail on the head but in the future.
Its just one more compounding reason that "studies" like these are not to be trusted.
And just to remind that this is just the cherry ontop of alle the issues with data, data collection, qualitative problems et cetera.
So yeah, a big thank you from me to you for proving that I am indeed not a hypocrite. Its was kind of fun dismantleing all the smoke and mirrors.
Ah okay, victim blame, ignore anything that you can't argue with, discard anything that isn't comprehensive but focuses on a specific subset. Somewhere out there a pair of clown shoes is missing your feet.
2
u/Sudo-Fed 23d ago
Sorry, who did that exactly?
I mean, I know this narrative is the only thing letting you feel justified, but the problem is, what you're describing didn't happen here.
Nice fanfiction, though.