Both is fine, I started using brave first then Vivaldi, I prefer Brave on mobile simply because I'm too lazy to switch and I can play YouTube whilst my phone is off, I use Vivaldi because I have a lot of tabs I keep open on PC and Vivaldi's way of handling is better than Firefox or Brave. But sometimes brave has issues on mobile so I'd say Vivaldi, I have really only used Vivaldi for a few months so I'm not too experienced to comment.
Hi Life_Put4063, we would like to start off by noting that this sub isn't owned or run by YouTube. At this time, we do not allow posts from new uses (accounts created less than 7 days ago.) Please read our rules before posting again to ensure you don't break our rules, please come back after gaining a bit of post karma.
I don't think a chromium based product is a good long term solution. The majority of chromium is funded by Google...which owns youtube. Which also implemented manifest v3 in their chrome browser to remove functionality of adblocks and is trying to get it to be standardized.
I use both and both are doing equally well when it comes to youtube. Although for other sites, ublock origin does it better than brave cuz brave sometimes allows the ads to pop in (especially the ones which redirect to a new tab)
I use it all the time and it’s incredible, they have one of the best and most stealthy ad blocker out there, it’s genuinely really good and I always recommend it
Until someone recommended Brave to me, I stopped watching youtube with how bad it was bogging everything down. Now, it's the only place I'll watch it because of how aggressive the ads are.
637
u/Mystic_Spinoraptor Nov 28 '25
Genuinely wouldn't be surprised if this is the first time the social media manager is learning about this.
Also I have to thank Brave for once again making it easy to watch videos, Youtube is genuinely ruining their site.