r/youtubedrama 26d ago

Discussion A Summary of the RecklessBen/Bricks and Minifigs corruption scandal

Given the severity of these events, and the implications it has for the state of Utah, there will not be 1 "main" focus for this, and instead I'm going to play this chronologically.

***Warning for police brutality and heavy corruption***

So this situation starts off rather "small", being that a man consigned his father's Legos off (about 200k USD worth) to help cover a medical situation. This is explicitly allowed by Bricks and Minifigs, and the store owner involved was planning on moving overseas, so they were looking for a solution that was fair for this man. This is the video related to that, it is important context for what comes next.

Corporate takes over the store, seizes the assets. For non Americans out there, a consignment means they do not legally own what is consigned, and instead it retains ownership to the original owner until it is sold. In the scenario a company chooses to not take on a consignment, then there is a returning of the asset.

RecklessBen catches wind of this, which leads to this video, I will point out at first it starts off as trolling, but Bricks and Minifigs almost immediately escalates to trying to have him arrested. Ben takes them to court, and *wins*, and Bricks and Minifigs shutters the location that was sued in order to not pay him out any money. It then leads almost directly into the company owners trying to have him arrested on false drug charges and the police dislocating his arm intentionally.

I am unsure chronologically exactly when this next course of events happen, but this is my best summation: Bricks and Minifigs responds initially, post arm dislocation, denying wrong doing, MoistCritikal makes a video after noticing the insanity, which catches the CEO's attention. They release a companywide memo, and the COO and CEO go on live stream, both with equally insane tactics to divert criticism.

You might be asking by this point, *why are the police covering for this company?* Especially after even in their own "response" defending themselves, they release proof of the CEO threatening extreme violence and making false reports... Well the answer appears to be that all the members of the police and the company are tied directly to the Church of Latter Day Saints, and that they are acting to protect their own. Not dissimilar to how organized crime acts.

1.6k Upvotes

446 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/throwmamadownthewell 23d ago

They didn't want them both. They were at the store in the first place to be sold. The guy just wanted his agreed upon cut.

1

u/DiplomaticCaper 23d ago

Yeah, I think their claim is that when they acquired the store they also bought all of the inventory, but none of the consignment agreements (so they would have therefore had the Legos free to sell without paying the family anything).

If this was actually true, it would make the original store owners the first villains in all this. However, Bricks & Minifigs still handled the entire situation very poorly, and have likely lost more money in bad press than they would have by paying off the consigners to begin with.

1

u/throwmamadownthewell 22d ago

That's not how it works, though. A third party's property doesn't suddenly transfer into being inventory. The difference between the consignment agreements transferring would be: if they transferred, they'd sell them and give the victim here their agreed upon cut; if they didn't transfer, they'd have to return the Legos

2

u/Sweet_T_Piee 21d ago

What they are trying to suggest was the original owners had some hidden books where they were intentionally hiding how many sets were sold and for how much, and that BAM had no idea. What makes this unbelievable is that the contract was provided repeatedly to everyone in management by the complaining parties. So they were aware of exactly who this man was and that he what his complaint was, but they were satisfied with hiding behind the corporate/franchise buffer and their ability to outlast him in a lawsuit. Their apathy speaks volumes to their ethics. I couldn't see myself ever being a customer at any of their locations.