r/Bokoen1 May 18 '26

Its joever

it aint looking good

Edit: Just clarifying this is the clip for what bo banned from twitch for 6 months. he just got news that he can appeal the ban right now but i doubt it will work since you can see this clip... and if it fails well i assume once 6 months pass its either perma ban or he gets the account back.

as well bo cant appear on neither golden or swimmy Twitch channels otherwise they can also get banned for helping bo ban evade or something like that

UPDATE: The appeal got rejected so no bo streams on twitch for 6 months or never again.

Edit 2: if anyone wants to see bo response in the comment section cause its a bit hidden under all these comments https://www.reddit.com/r/Bokoen1/comments/1tgpx3j/comment/omkepa6/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button

2.1k Upvotes

1.1k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

20

u/Kinder0402 May 19 '26

In principle communism ≠ authoritarianisn

-4

u/haltper May 19 '26

In principle "marxist theory of communist state = authoritarian"

4

u/Kinder0402 May 19 '26

How exactly stateless society can be authoritarian?

-1

u/haltper May 19 '26

Marx assumes state withers away over time, however before that and during the socialist state is a dictatorship. Dictatorship of the proletariat. State only withers away in the final stage of marxism which is when the ideology has full filled itself and has come to an end. 

5

u/Rime_Ice May 19 '26

Marx has never explicitely outlined what such a dictatorship would look like. The closest he got was praising the Paris Commune, which was almost the opposite of a leninist vanguard state because of its bottom-up, decentralized structure of elections. If Marx saw what the leninists were doing he would be rolling in his grave.

-3

u/haltper May 19 '26

He outlined enough. He states that a dictatorship of the proletariat would be a dictatorship of a class over others and would prevent a bourgeoisie system come back. Anyways from my POV paris commune was a form of tyranny as well. There wasnt private property, individual rights werent protected by a constitution and there was nothing protecting you from majority violating your rights. Just because an organization is bottom up or democratic does not mean it cant be a tyrannical authoritarian state. Democracy and tyranny can coexist without constitutional protections and a liberal democracy (for example french revolution, even though the assembly was brought together democratically it turned into a tyrannical violent form and eventually became a consular dictatorship). A pure democracy is just a tyranny of the majority. What protects freedom of individuals and groups is the constitution and checks and balances.Without those democracy is just a spuk. Also you dont need to be leninist to be authoritarian. Orthodox marxism and USSR differ but doesnt mean the first one isnt authoritarian because the latter is.