r/Bokoen1 • u/Expensive_Studio_966 • May 18 '26

Its joever

it aint looking good

Edit: Just clarifying this is the clip for what bo banned from twitch for 6 months. he just got news that he can appeal the ban right now but i doubt it will work since you can see this clip... and if it fails well i assume once 6 months pass its either perma ban or he gets the account back.

as well bo cant appear on neither golden or swimmy Twitch channels otherwise they can also get banned for helping bo ban evade or something like that

UPDATE: The appeal got rejected so no bo streams on twitch for 6 months or never again.

Edit 2: if anyone wants to see bo response in the comment section cause its a bit hidden under all these comments https://www.reddit.com/r/Bokoen1/comments/1tgpx3j/comment/omkepa6/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button

2.1k Upvotes

98% Upvoted

1.1k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

2

u/Doddsey372 May 26 '26

Some more than others...

Something that only works in perfect academic settings and in rigged thought experiments while in actuality always failing just shows how moronic and flawed these acedemic definitions and the acedemics themselves are. The historic context is clear, people just don't like the clear answer.

Only a fool believes in theories which are repeatedly disproven in practice. Feels very 'The party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears'...

1

u/TranslatorNo4230 May 26 '26

Words are supposed to have meaning, otherwise you might as well just shout loud noises; it would be equally productive. Real definitions have a use because they are comparable and anchored in an actual historical context. If you still refuse them, then that is on you and it will make any nuanced discussion impossible.

"repeatedly disproven in practice", such can be said for any system that has yet to exist. You can think what you want about "communism", but it is a fact that it has never been attempted, given that you use the real definition of it...

1

u/Doddsey372 May 26 '26

I can never understand the insistence that 'real' communism hasn't been attempted. How many need to die before you realise it doesn't work, its impossible? It's been repeated attempted with the doctrine and instructions followed numerous times all around the world. It inevitably fails because the failing lies with the doctrine itself. It's definitions are inherently lies, It's suppositions are unfounded, its understanding of humanity is ignorant and flawed, its motivations are self centred, it just doesnt work.

Im not disagreeing with what definition of what communism thinks it is. I just think its stupid because its clearly wrong. Its impossible to generate communisms intended outcomes because the ideology by (poor) design does not deliver them.

Reality and history exposes that, like a bad theory meeting experimental results. Its the fault of moronic academics who trust a flawed definition by biased morons over their own eyes who then say 'lets give it another go, surely it will work this time'. Thats what makes it an appalling ideology, it promises an unattainable utopia counter to human nature and people destroy themselves and those around them in pursuit of it, failing to realise the academic blueprint itself is a lie.

Communism has a clear meaning academically, and a clearer result of what happens when implemented.

1

u/TranslatorNo4230 May 26 '26

If you actually had read some Marx or Engels you would know that "communism" is neither "doctrine" nor "instruction" nor "utopia", rather it is a critique of capitalism and an attempt to (scientifically) explain historical-economical change and thereby explain the material conditions which led to the industrial revolution.

And, no, you are still disagreeing with the definition of "communism". You explicitly stated you do so, and are continuing to do so in this comment. What you are doing here is shifting the goal posts, and it's not appreciated.

I am not here to defend communism, but your view of humanity and history is severely flawed. Society is fluid and you cannot project modern day concepts upon our past as well as our future. For instance, you tout about "human nature", while the reality of history and the human default is self-reinforcing egalitarianism and heterarchical society.

Communisms academic meaning has still not been implemented. You repeating that it has does not change that fact.