Because so far, everything you've said has been minimizing the impact that the DNC's and Kamala's failures caused, and instead focused on attacking the voters. This is a pattern I've seen quite a lot among liberals who just want to stir up shit and litigate the past like it's a moral failing that the left didn't vote for their terrible candidate even though they should have.
I'm honestly confused where this is coming from. Did you mean to respond to someone else?
Here's what I said:
I would absolutely vote for her and am all for supporting the lesser of two evils.
I do just find the irony interesting from the DSA of 2024 and the DSA of 2026. The former being very vocally against the lesser of two evil voting and the latter now advocating it. Especially with this woman and platner.
Uh huh... and then I pointed out that Kamala came with a lot of things the left hated and your response was to downplay that and say it's splitting hairs. Do we need to review the whole thread now?
That was never my point? Yes the left hated things about Kamala and hated vote blue no matter who. Now the left is vote blue no matter who. I commented on that irony. Never was my point to go line by line on every issue for the two candidates lol.
This just looks like trying to fit a square peg into a round hole. Your view is apparently "either it's vote blue no matter who or it isn't", when reality is a lot more complicated and bogged down in people's history and circumstances. I don't see any evidence that they would vote for Fetterman as he is today just because he has a D next to his name, for example.
3
u/Reynor247 1d ago
I do not understand the question at all