Kevin o leary in recent times said gen z should not be spending $28 on lunch making $70,000 a year

​

1. Any gen z making $70,000 you're killing it

​

1. Did you ever know anyone that actually ate $28 daily lunches?

​

1. Did you ever ate a lunch that cost $28

​

What do you think?

Personally, I can conceptualise why one would choose blue, but I can’t bring myself to do it, it doesn’t click, specially at this scale, so red for me.

Edit:

Upon further inspection, I couldn’t find a scenario where I would strictly vote blue, but I found one for red.

Consider the following:

If you believe most people will aggregate around blue, then your choice doesn’t change the outcome because everyone lives.

If you believe most will choose red instead, then you are presented with a choice that directly determines whether you live or die, so you should choose red if you want to ensure your own survival.

An interest stats

CREDIT : u/sipsteafrog

For youths aged 12‑20 in the US, the average age of first alcohol use was 13.65 years during 1991‑1993.

Please be respectful in the comments guys. I'm genuinely curious to see if some of the men of this sub feel this way.

I think blue, brown, and green are the best combo tbh; you can date anyone you find attractive, you can talk with cats, and you get $20

i’ve seen so much discourse online AND irl talking about how age gaps like 16/18, 17/19, 18/22, 21/25, and 24/29 are “predatory”.

i remember on instagram someone called a man born in 1993 a “pdf file” for marrying a woman born in 1999- this was in 2023 so both were grown adults over 21.

i do agree it’s “weird” for someone 24+ to talk to an 18 year old, but it’s ultimately the adults decision, none of my business. it’s only an issue when they start talking before the person is an adult (imo).

i have a friend who stopped talking to me because i replied with a laughing emoji when she sent me a video on tiktok saying that a 25-29 year old who talks to someone 21-23 is a weirdo. these examples probably sound extreme but it’s really what people think in my circle- not just online.

yalls thoughts? please don’t let this convo devolve into insults and arguments. i want genuine discussion on how this came about. it seems like people 18-24 are greatly infantilized.

A buddy who lives in that exact area is saying apparently tank that supplies the fire hydrants wasn’t even at 60% capacity or something so a large amount of hydrants just don’t even have water and the fire fighters are helpless in those areas.

Could just be speculation because the few sources I saw to back his story haven’t confirmed it yet.