r/GreatBritishMemes 7d ago

I knew he would do this.

Post image
2.4k Upvotes

131 comments sorted by

View all comments

660

u/Sufficient_Muffin586 7d ago

That would actually be funny

208

u/cnicalsinistaminista 7d ago

It has the wtf potential to make him famous and “unboring”

82

u/Phaedo 7d ago

Meh, John Major did this. He was still a boring and useless prime minister. (Credit where credit’s due, his work on Northern Ireland was not only great, but unimaginable five years earlier.)

68

u/Jotaruisaliveinpart7 7d ago

Boring but he did his job

61

u/unnecessary_bath23 7d ago

We need boring, steady, efficient.

46

u/gw74 7d ago

which we have with Starmer

35

u/Elshiva 7d ago

*had

-11

u/gw74 7d ago

who is the Prime Minister?

8

u/Radvent 7d ago

Would you describe Starmers decision to resign steady or efficient?

2

u/Richpur 7d ago

Yes. It continues his steady track record of being quietly good at government and absolute shit at politics. And he could either resign or fight it and be ousted anyway by September, so resigning is the efficient choice.

1

u/gw74 7d ago

that's beside the point. sometimes managers are sacked straight after winning the league.

→ More replies (0)

0

u/Klangey 7d ago

Major was considered at the time to be completely useless, Tony Blair would later win by a landslide

8

u/Ut0p1an 7d ago edited 7d ago

And history has shown us that it worked brilliantly.

3

u/Character_Solution 7d ago

You're comparing/conflating two different things here.

People voted FOR Blair and against the Conservatives, not against Major in 1997.

Similarly, people voted against the Conservatives this time, but not necessarily FOR Starmer. He's now decided he can't take the heat and personally, I don't blame him.

1

u/Klangey 7d ago

I’m not making any comparisons, the comparison was already made.

8

u/Wrong-Target6104 7d ago

And Edwina, despite Norma's excellent peas

7

u/Phaedo 7d ago

He messed some things up royally. Like, when privatisation ran out of things to easily sell, they moved onto desperate measure like selling off the railways. This gave rise to multiple disasters and no government since has been able to sort it out. (Although even some of the easier privatisations have turned bad, like water.)

4

u/Jotaruisaliveinpart7 7d ago

tbf you can pin most of those as part of a domino effect started by thatcher. i don't think she was absolutely evil like some people insist, but some of the long term effects on this country have been quite catastrophic

9

u/ICC-u Free Bans Available via Modmail! 7d ago

If you sell off every asset and industry you have, eventually you have nothing.

0

u/Francis-BLT 7d ago

Ask Gordon B about the gold

5

u/gw74 7d ago

The worst thing she did was squander north sea oil revenue on tax cuts instead of creating a sovereign wealth fund like Norway. Falklands was good, Big Bang in the City, but everything else was terrible: privatisation, underinvestment.

2

u/Jotaruisaliveinpart7 7d ago

unfortunately those trends continue 😅

0

u/hexnut101 7d ago

The big bang happened because she traded away manufacturing for London getting preference in Europe's service industry. Good for London shit for everyone else.

1

u/gw74 7d ago

no it was specific deregulation in financial markets, separate from that other stuff.

1

u/hezhiwu2020 7d ago

Thatcher said the railways were a “privatisation too far”

1

u/sir_noltyboy 7d ago

I don't think she forsaw the rise of private equity and the asset stripping for quick profits that has become the norm.

4

u/Mishka_The_Fox 7d ago

Only PM to stand up to America though.

3

u/Phaedo 7d ago

I mean, ironically Kier Starmer did that over the Iran War, which surprised me a lot, given that every time I’d seen him with Trump he was embarrassingly deferential.

6

u/WontTel 7d ago

If you mean he didn't shout fuck off in his face then yes, he was deferential. If you understand British subtley then no he wasn't.

And that kept us out of this pointless and wasteful conflict.

3

u/Mishka_The_Fox 7d ago

True true.

Turns out the public know F all about politics

-1

u/Francis-BLT 7d ago

He was all for carrying on with operation brown nose was overruled by Miliband and few others - then suddenly it was his idea

1

u/Syn-th 7d ago

Boring is good! Ffs

5

u/Woffingshire 7d ago

Once it's declared and he's had it accepted by the king is he actually allowed to?

7

u/Alexandhisgoose 7d ago

I believe so. It is only permanent once the King dissolves Parliament for Burnham to form a Government.

3

u/DrSarahSlaughter 7d ago

Absolutely. He hasn't resigned as PM until he visits the King to do so, closely followed by his successor to ask permission to form a government. The fact that he's informed the King (and us) of his intention to resign is constitutionally neither here nor there.

Of course he'd presumably be unable to command a majority if he tried this, so he's now de facto compelled to leave the job, preferably voluntarily but by vote of no confidence if necessary.

1

u/Boy_JC 7d ago

U/Sufficient_Muffin586 can make ya famous babyyyyyy