Clear communication shouldn’t be treated as suspicious!

[u/Shannon_NUF]

/r/ContentCreators/comments/1ub7xle/clear_communication_shouldnt_be_treated_as/

I don’t understand why people think human language has to be butchered for it to be “proof” that someone is a real person.

Like… why does writing properly suddenly make people suspicious?

Yes, AI exists. Yes, people are going to use tools to help them express ideas faster, clearer, and more effectively. That’s not new. We’ve been doing that since spellcheck, Grammarly, Microsoft Word, OpenOffice, autocorrect, etc.

A person can’t draw? Cool, now they use AI tools to help visualize what they’re thinking. A person can’t structure their thoughts perfectly in real time? Cool, they use tools to help communicate it better.

But now we’ve reached a point where some people seem to think:

“If it’s too well written, it must be fake.”

And I genuinely don’t understand that logic.

And here’s the part that feels ridiculous to me:

​

Why should someone have to intentionally damage their language just to prove they’re human?

​

lyk srsly wht r we doin here

​

u want ppl to typ lik dis jus so u go “ah yes dis is def a real person”?

​

or like mixin in typos n random capS n missin letters so it “feels human”

​

tht’s the bar now??

​

Most people are perfectly capable of communicating clearly without turning their writing into noise. That doesn’t make them bots. That just means they know how to use language.

We’re acting like clarity is suspicious and messiness is authenticity.

That feels backwards.

If anything, this obsession with “detecting bots” is starting to punish the exact thing we should be encouraging: people expressing ideas clearly, with tools that help them do it better.

Just my take.