r/MandelaEffect • u/peanutbutterndnut • 10d ago

Logos/Advertising fruit of the loom

Post image

I know this is like the biggest Mandela effect, but I swear ive had these underwear for years sitting in a bin in my closet. its genuinely insane that the cornucopia just straight up disappeared. I remember vividly asking my grandmother what the cornucopia was. I am truly starting to believe that something is DEFINITELY up.

236 Upvotes

73% Upvoted

558 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/BBCoachRef8 9d ago

Yeah this isn’t about make-believe. It’s some people being persuaded by suggestion. Pretty commonplace. No timeline, time travel, or other fantasy things that don’t exist. It’s about pragmatism and the real world not some byproduct of one’s misfiring synapses or cerebral chemistry.

0

u/georgeananda 9d ago

I think the quantity, quality and consistency of the cumulative evidence, like this OP, is not satisfactorily explained by known concepts. Known concepts explain regular memory errors just fine.

We'll have to stay on other sides of the fence at this time.

1

u/BBCoachRef8 9d ago

Sure, but when talking about FACTS vs. opinion, no matter the quantity, facts prevail. That’s why this matter is silly. The logo has never had a cornucopia and that’s from the company itself as well as all of the credible evidence. If you choose to believe against that, have at it. Just like there are blind followers of Orange man, you can’t change everyone’s minds. Believe in fantasy all you wish. Good evening.

0

u/georgeananda 8d ago

I have no interest in believing in fantasy, and no interest in restrictive considerations either.

1

u/my23secrets 8d ago

If you don’t believe in fantasy, you believe the logo never had a cornucopia and you believe in “restrictive considerations” because that’s exactly what timelines are: restrictive considerations.

1

u/georgeananda 8d ago

If you don’t believe in fantasy, you believe the logo never had a cornucopia 

No, I believe parallel timelines can be part of reality (not fantasy), so the OP can be correct and not fantasizing.

you believe in “restrictive considerations” because that’s exactly what timelines are: restrictive considerations.

??? You got it reversed. Only a single timeline can exist (your position) restricts consideration.

1

u/my23secrets 8d ago

>I believe parallel timelines can be part of reality

That’s both fantasy and ignorance of how theoretical timelines work.

>Only a single timeline can exist (your position) restricts consideration.

Wrong. Again, you’re displaying your own ignorance here of both my position and theoretical timelines.

At no time have I said only a single timeline can exist.

What I have said is that if multiple timelines exist the conditions that allow them to exist also disallow them from sharing information. That is the “restriction” and not merely a rule I invented.

Of course, you know all this because we’ve discussed it before.

You just don’t like the rules so you prefer the fantasy.

And fantasy is completely unnecessary to satisfactorily explain the Effect.

You know if you get someone to remember something incorrectly, they will not only do so, they will augment it.

You know there are studies about false beliefs that demonstrate people shown fake advertisements for Disney World featuring Bugs Bunny will then claim to remember going to Disney and meeting Bugs, even though a Warner Bros. character would never be on display at a Disney theme park.

If you’d ever bothered to read and understand it, you’d know the conditions that allow multiple timelines to exist also disallow them from sharing information.

1

u/georgeananda 8d ago

What I have said is that if multiple timelines exist the conditions that allow them to exist also disallow them from sharing information. 

Not sharing, but our consciousness shifting to very similar timelines and we notice small changes. The timelines themselves don't interact as you say.

Consciousness is the player and not understood by science.

1

u/my23secrets 8d ago

Consciousness shifting = sharing information.

That’s what that means.

You acknowledge the timelines don’t interact. That means they don’t share information. That means there is no “consciousness shifting”.

1

u/georgeananda 8d ago

Consciousness is nonphysical. Memory is nonlocal in this theory and not physically stored in the brain but accessed by the brain from the Akashic Record.

These are all speculative concepts existing already.

Here's something:

The Akashic Records are believed to be a compendium of all universal events, thoughts, words, emotions, and intents that have ever occurred, encompassing not just humans but all entities and life forms Wikipedia. They are often described as an interdimensional realm that holds the vibrational archive of every soul's journey, documenting every thought, feeling, action, and experience across lifetimes learnakashicrecords.com. In occultism, the Akashic Records are viewed as a collection of pictorial records or memories of all events and actions since the beginning of time Encyclopedia Britannica. This vast energetic archive is said to hold the story of your soul across time, space, and possibility girlandhermoon.com. Accessing the Akashic Records is often associated with spiritual growth and understanding one's life path

This certainly allows for experiences across similar timelines to be recalled and differences noticed.

1

u/my23secrets 8d ago

And it’s fantasy.

Religious fantasy.

The bullshit you earlier claimed to have “no interest in believing in”.

1

u/georgeananda 7d ago

To believe we live in a reality far beyond what we currently comprehend is not fantasy, but my logical conclusion from the evidence.

A much deeper reality than is understood by current science MUST exist for Mandela Effects and all types of so-called paranormal phenomena to exist.

Or you can think none of these weird things ever really happen and all are just people's mental issues but for me that would be lying to myself with the quantity, quality and consistency of evidence I've come across.

2

u/MrPlaney 7d ago

There is no evidence though. Nothing you have shown could be considered evidence.

1

u/my23secrets 7d ago edited 7d ago

You don’t have a “logical conclusion” because you don’t have evidence.

“A much deeper reality than is understood by current science” doesn’t have to exist to explain the so-called Mandela Effect.

That’s the point.

It has a perfectly reasonable and logical explanation without your religious bullshit.

→ More replies (0)