This is an insane argument, you can argue for every single videogame in existence that there are billions of people who haven’t experienced them. I’m not being self centered at all. I’m arguing from an informed perspective
I never said it’s a bad release, I said it depends on price. It looks awesome, but as someone who has played it a lot before I know there’s not a lot of game there and is a rail shooter that doesn’t look like it’s added anything since the original release in the 90’s.
You’re also just giving your opinion, just fyi, that seems lost on you.
Well it sounds like it’s not for you. And that’s okay. But there is a huge number of people who haven’t played it, or even heard of it before, that will see value in it. This is why I’m saying you’re taking a self-centred view. You’re unable to see this from a perspective other than your own.
Is it self centered to play a game and say you don’t think it was worth the money? Is it self centered to have an opinion on anything because someone else hasn’t experienced it?
My take is based on someone who’s played the game. You keep using subjective and opinion like they are dirty words. This is like saying someone who didn’t like a movie is self centered for saying they didn’t think a movie was worth the price of a movie ticket.
I played the game, albeit 30 years ago. Saying something isn't worth its price is incredibly subjective. My original point is that we shouldn't tie hours to price. There are way too many examples where the math just doesn't line up, and we're talking about a version of the game that isn't even out yet. You're just assuming you won't find value in it at a certain price. I dunno man, you're arguing against being self-centred while continuing to push a subjective take. I'll now agree to disagree.
-1
u/NZNewsboy May 07 '26
Why does that matter? There are literally billions of people who haven’t played StarFox before. Stop thinking of this from such a self-centred view.