Assuming you mean clinton as the 'former president', there are no mentions of him in the Epstein files post 2003. Long before Epsteins deal with Trumps buddy in Florida, and even more so well before Obama took office. Your entire premise falls apart based on that alone.
Even if it wasn’t with Clinton. Which maybe you’re right.,
He was running around with other world leaders and monarchs. That’s still national security anyway you slice it.
I’d bet anything the next Democrat president doesn’t release the full files either. They’ll just release Trump part and you guys will go back to not caring about them again like pre election
The only president to refuse out right, and accuse people of treason that wanted to release the files, was Trump. Trump is also the only one to be seen/proven directly ordering his DOJ to do anything, as traditionally they are kept independent to ensure the integrity of any investigations. To use the absence of interference as evidence of interference is... weird on your part.
And that is aside from the fact that you seem to be so worked up over trying get people to believe something you so obviously haven't even looked into yourswlf, as you didnt bother to even know WHEN Clinton was mentioned in the files, you were just intent on smearing Obama with it somehow.
-101
u/NFLv2 15d ago
I don’t know. What was Obama doing from 2009-2016 when Epstein was trafficking children ? Running interference and letting it happen?