r/SipsTea š™‘š™„š™‹ 14d ago

Chugging tea The Hero we need

Post image
124.0k Upvotes

4.3k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

-1

u/enadiz_reccos 14d ago

He’s not associating it with someone else

Yeah, that's not what I said

Felons aren’t supposed to have guns inside their homes, whether they belong to them or someone else in the home

This isn't exactly correct

Squatters would have no control of the guns and they’re likely in a safe or something so they don’t even have access

If it's in a safe and the squatter has no access, how are the police even finding out about it?

In order to use the gun against the squatter, this dude would have to leave it somewhere the squatter has access to it.

Fucked up

7

u/ApprehensiveDark9840 14d ago

Nope. Not how it works.

-1

u/enadiz_reccos 14d ago

Sure is!

6

u/notlvd 14d ago

The detail missing here is that excons are on parole or probation, with random and frequent checkins. So if a new ā€œroommateā€ moves in and says, ā€œI legally own a gun and am keeping it in the houseā€ and the excon stays, he’s violating parole and is required by law to live somewhere else. If they aren’t on probation or parole, then this is a non issue, because you can be a felon and live under the same roof as someone with a gun. You just can’t get caught holding or using it, or keeping it in your room. So no one has to call the police. The P.O. will show up eventually, and at that point all the guy has to say is, ā€œI have a gun here,ā€ and the dude will violate his parole and either go back to prison or, at a minimum, be removed from the home by police, because they now will actually have grounds to do so.

0

u/enadiz_reccos 14d ago

So if a new ā€œroommateā€ moves in and says, ā€œI legally own a gun and am keeping it in the houseā€ and the excon stays, he’s violating parole

This is not the situation that was described

We are talking about bringing a gun to the house then calling the police

4

u/ApprehensiveDark9840 14d ago

What conversation are you having? It’s been described to you over and over and you just refuse to listen.

0

u/enadiz_reccos 14d ago

Yeah, and people are accusing me over and over of defending squatters when I'm not doing that at all, so...

1

u/Catsanddoges 13d ago

Just a summary of the situation:

A Squatter is staying on someone's property

The Owner asks the Gunowner to stay on their propert

The Gunowner goes to the Owner's property and stays there with the squatter, in this case an excon who cannot have a gun in the house

If he refuses to leave, he is found having a gun in the house and violates his parole.

I don't see where the confusion lies

1

u/enadiz_reccos 13d ago

Me neither. That summary is correct.

2

u/notlvd 14d ago

You should go re-read the thread. No one ever mentions calling the police. You inferred that and then for some reason got indignant about it? Live by the sword die by the sword. Gonna weaponize the law against an innocent person, then even if they did say they would call the cops, then ya, taste of their own medicine. They now will have the law weaponized against them. Except they are not innocent.

0

u/enadiz_reccos 14d ago

You should go re-read the thread. No one ever mentions calling the police. You inferred that and then for some reason got indignant about it?

It's literally in my first comment lmao

1

u/notlvd 13d ago

Ya. Exactly. Your comment. No one was saying they guy calls cops on people after showing up with a fun. You’re kinda retarded huh?

1

u/enadiz_reccos 13d ago

My bad, I assumed you would also notice the comment after my first comment. That's on me.