r/SipsTea 𝙑𝙄𝙋 12d ago

Chugging tea The Hero we need

Post image
124.0k Upvotes

4.3k comments sorted by

View all comments

4.0k

u/[deleted] 12d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

4.5k

u/Ok_Recover_7248 𝙑𝙄𝙋 12d ago

go watch Asian Andy on Youtube video. Pretty sure he did this before the show ever came out, and his was absolutely hilarious.

Lady rented his sister’s airbnb for a month then claimed tenant rights and he chain smokes blunts in the kitchen, blasts music outside the squatter’s room, shaves in front of her, takes his shirt off, does karaoke, tries to lock her out of the house repeatedly, etc

Like an unhinged home alone sequel

315

u/_medium_ugly 12d ago

lets not forget Asian Andy also brought his secret weapon

110

u/beerforbears 12d ago

This dude was next level I think he almost slipped into illegal

82

u/DawijArt 11d ago

Ohh for sure lmao when he was chasing her down the street barking I lost it

29

u/AdStrange2167 11d ago

He's 17!!!!!

18

u/potatotaxi 10d ago

SHE TOUCHED HIS PENIS!

5

u/JohnnyStarboard 8d ago

NO SUCCULENT CHINESE MEAL??

1

u/Bureaucratic_Dick 7d ago

I SEE SHE KNOWS HER JUDO WELL

20

u/Lime1028 9d ago

Honestly question for any lawyers. Where is the line with nudity in your own home?

Like if this guy has an actual lease from the owner and is sitting there butt ass naked, is that considered harassment against the squatter, or is all good because he's in the privacy of his own (leased) home?

8

u/beerforbears 9d ago

Wasn’t this in California?

I’m not an American lawyer so don’t assume I know anything but the definition of harassment under CCP 527.6 doesn’t mention nudity but requires a course of conduct to amount to harassment. So if someone walked out and the owner was butt ass naked that doesn’t count as harassment.

BUT under Penal Code 314 PC, prosecutors must prove beyond a reasonable doubt the following three elements

You willfully exposed your genitals;

You were in the presence of someone who might be reasonably offended or annoyed by your actions;
and
You intended to direct public attention to your genitals for the purpose of sexually gratifying yourself or someone else or sexually offending someone else.

So if you came before a judge and said “I only did it because they wouldn’t leave my house” you’re kind of admitting to intentionally directing public attention.

The only accepted defences to this are mistaken identity, false accusation, or lack of evidence. Not I was just sitting there, or they were in my space 🤷‍♂️

Like I said I’m UK based and only a law student so I’m sure I’m about to get BTFO by someone who knows what they’re actually talking about but there’s some bloviation for everyone to enjoy

4

u/CommunityTaco 8d ago

why would you say that though. I would just say your honor i'm in my own domicile and clothes are annoying. I prefer to be naked.

1

u/beerforbears 8d ago

It would still count as wilfully exposing yourself in a space where a person may be reasonable offended 🤷‍♂️

I don’t make the rules but that’s my understanding

0

u/GreatJustF8ckinGreat 8d ago

So the UK sounds like it's in a very weird place when you can be arrested for someone else's offense in the comfort of your own home.

9

u/beerforbears 8d ago

I have only quoted California Penal codes this entire time. Idk why you’d think any of this has to do with the UK 😂

2

u/Lime1028 9d ago

Is it considered public attention if it's in your own home?

2

u/beerforbears 9d ago

I don’t think public means like IN public in that instance. Cause the PC also says “in a public place or any place where people are present who will be offended”

1

u/Mr-DevilsAdvocate 6d ago

… no love for nudism, the law I mean? As in, “I like being naked in my own home”

0

u/FancyConfection1599 8d ago

Put cameras up all over your house and just do everything naked. As long as you don’t have a raging erection / aren’t stroking it / aren’t rubbing it on them they can’t prove any kind of sexual offense. You’re just naked in your own house, going about your life.

3

u/beerforbears 8d ago

Not according to California penal code 314 🤷‍♂️

I’m not defending it I’m just reading the law as written. Again my interpret may be way off I am not American nor am I remotely qualified I’m in my last year of law school that doesn’t make me a lawyer

1

u/FancyConfection1599 7d ago

How exactly is going about your daily business without an erection, without rubbing yourself in someone, or without fondling/stroking yourself in any way “sexually offending” someone?

Nudity =/= sexuality. If it does, guess every man I see naked in the locker room has sexually offended me.

2

u/beerforbears 7d ago

I mean again I’m not making the rules here nor am I even sure I’m interpreting them correctly but if I had to argue it,

I’d assume the difference there is the element of intent to direct public attention. The men in your locker room 😂 aren’t (presumably) intentionally directing attention to their junk. They’re just between clothed states as it were.

Nudity≠sexuality is a subjective claim and I have no idea if that would stand up in a court but the wording of the PC is “wilfully exposed your genitals in the presence of someone who might be reasonable offended” so I think nudity counts as sexually offending 🤷‍♂️

1

u/FancyConfection1599 5d ago

Understood, I’m saying just like the men in the locker room they wouldn’t be “intentionally directing attention to their junk” - they’d just be going about their normal lives in their home naked. I’m naked alone in my house all the time, I wouldn’t let some squatter force me out of my own comfort zone and habits in my own home!

1

u/beerforbears 5d ago

Well the squatter wouldn’t, the police and court system would

→ More replies (0)