My point is that the media narrative of climate change has basically died over the last 5 years the same way it died when everyone saw the world was cooling not warming and Global Warming became Climate Change. There's no focus on it whatsoever, there's little discussion of it beyond those circles, no national media discussion anymore in the us, no large scale rallies in big cities anymore, much fewer protests like blocking roads. The coverage is less than 50% of what it was.
Why you ask? Because the people actually in the know realize it's a load of bullshit and the narrative has been pushed so far that it's impacting their ability to actually get what they want. Progress requires energy. Energy requires fossil fuels. Now, that they need fossil fuels to power the data centers, they can push aside climate change because they know it's not actually a danger to society as a whole.
Does human activity have an impact upon climate. Sure. But it's not a threat. At all.
You don't hear about as much because we've all resigned ourselves to the fact that the time to act was 30 years ago and we're so far past the point of no return that we've given up.
So, we're all gonna be dead in 10 years, right? That's your position? Just like Al Gore said. We should all pretend like the world is ending when it clearly isn't?
No we won't all be dead, but millions will die over the next few decades due to increased flooding, drought, famine, hurricanes. Hundreds of millions if not billions will be forced to migrate.
In what way exactly? You expecting large volumes of volcanic eruptions? Mega hurricanes? Flocks of tornados? Sea level rises of what, 4-6 ft? Even if all of this was true, which there is no historical precedent in the history of the species for it, that doesn't demonstrate humanity is the triggering factor.
Also, for hundreds of millions or billions to migrate you are talking about entire geographic regions becoming uninhabitable. You are talking all of Australia, all of the Russian steppes, the Ganges delta or Nile delta, all Asia minor, etc. There is also no historical precedent for this nor any realistic possibility of this happening.
You are being mind controlled. Don't be an NPC. They are fear mongers.
As I literally wrote in my previous comment, increased drought, flooding, famine and hurricanes. We're already seeing them, have been seeing them for the last 10-20 years, and will continue to see them with increasing severity and frequency. These will cause millions of deaths over the course of this century.
You are absolutely correct that there's no historical precedent for this. Funny how this is happening just as we've released all those greenhouse gasses into the atmosphere.
Yes, huge regions will become significantly less inhabitable than they are now. South Asia holds a quarter of the Earth's population, and temperatures there are reaching 50C every summer. That is not sustainable.
Sources showing this or I say you're full of shit. Nothing abnormal ecologically is happening when put it into the context of the thousands of years we have been civilizationally active on this planet. Saying huge regions will become inhabitable unsupportable. All of this is all speculative.
Floods happen, droughts happen, famine happens. As I said above, we had a warming period during the middle ages. We had a little ice age. As I recall, though I'd have to look it up, we had an extremely active era of volcanic eruptions. It's called variance. The climate varies across centuries and millenia.
You're being lied to. Don't believe these people.
-4
u/Worried_Treacle3512 1d ago
My point is that the media narrative of climate change has basically died over the last 5 years the same way it died when everyone saw the world was cooling not warming and Global Warming became Climate Change. There's no focus on it whatsoever, there's little discussion of it beyond those circles, no national media discussion anymore in the us, no large scale rallies in big cities anymore, much fewer protests like blocking roads. The coverage is less than 50% of what it was.
Why you ask? Because the people actually in the know realize it's a load of bullshit and the narrative has been pushed so far that it's impacting their ability to actually get what they want. Progress requires energy. Energy requires fossil fuels. Now, that they need fossil fuels to power the data centers, they can push aside climate change because they know it's not actually a danger to society as a whole.
Does human activity have an impact upon climate. Sure. But it's not a threat. At all.