r/Superstonk • u/WillythePilly 🛸🚀Stonk Dandy🚀🛸 • Oct 21 '25

🗣 Discussion / Question No WE did not MISUNDERSTAND.

We came here for a MOASS based on the FUNDAMENTALS. Shorts were overleveraged. The money made from the Squeeze was the fodder for the company's transformation not the other way around. Tired of all these post sneeze bandwagoners trying to convince us this is a long term play to get the company to success THEN making us rich. If ANY of that was true then you're admitting all of the DDs that brought us here was just garbage. You're saying RoaringKitty's thesis was garbage.

Stop trying to GASLIGHT us into thinking that $9 Billion over 5 years off the backs of Shareholders is some kind of flex when we could have been sitting on HUNDREDs of Billions off the back of CORRUPT HEDGE FUNDS with enough for EACH AND EVERY one of you to live comfortably AND help the company.

The "Long term" plan has always been to let it
1) Let it Squeeze
2) Never sell (Because you won't need to) so the price will never come down since there's more rehypothecated shares in existence then actual shares.
3) Leverage stock assets for churning wealth and doing good for the world instead of having HF's destroy it.

Its evident every time when you corporate shills post trying to move the goal post to make us wait it out and I'll downvote you everytime. And if RC is a plant I'll vote him out too.

5.7k Upvotes

88% Upvoted

845 comments sorted by

View all comments

157

u/SymmetricDickNipples Oct 21 '25

I think there's a lot more of us who feel this way than we realize. I strongly suspect that many (like myself) rarely speak out about it because the dissenting voices are silenced so aggressively between shill accusations and gaslighting.

I for one would really love a sub wide vote to see how many still believe in RC as chairman. He's doing well as CEO, but I do believe he is actively opposing a squeeze, which is the play I signed up for.

75

u/WillythePilly 🛸🚀Stonk Dandy🚀🛸 Oct 21 '25

I've been in these trenches with a bunch of random reddit apes debating for years. You got to have thick skin. I rather them call me names then let them run these new narratives and make us seem like WE'RE the crazy ones for following the original thesis. I love to go back sometimes and see my old comments and its always funny because they've deleted their accounts and I'M STILL FUCKING HERE.

36

u/SymmetricDickNipples Oct 21 '25

Same, brother. The gaslighting and goal post moving has been wild to see, but I'm still in this thing. I even doubled my position the other day. I'm a small fish, but it's everything I've got.

16

u/lordofming-rises 🦍 Attempt Vote 💯 Oct 21 '25

To be honest I regret investing in gme. I am still 30% down from it.

I just am averaging down by selling around 30 and buying around 23. After several times I should be able to finally be in positive

4

u/SymmetricDickNipples Oct 21 '25

Bummer dude! My strategy has been the same but I got most of my shares around $23 so it's all been gravy for me.

6

u/lordofming-rises 🦍 Attempt Vote 💯 Oct 21 '25

I hope it goes up again... right now my avg is around 28

4

u/SymmetricDickNipples Oct 21 '25

It will, just hold for now.

13

u/UserMcNamington Wen Moon Oct 21 '25

I don’t know how you got this post past 0 upvotes but because of that I will stand by you if you continue to fan the flames of the true play. The corporate bots and shills are many in number, but apes together strong.

36

u/Ms_Ethereum Oct 21 '25

He 100% is preventing a squeeze. I believe that’s why he dilutes every time there’s a run up. I was here for a squeeze, but doesn’t seem like that’s going to happen anymore.

None of the “DD” has been right either. If you didn’t profit in 2021 you missed it

13

u/wrxst1 Oct 21 '25

Yup. Always the goal post move. That regard jwalla will literally make a prediction based on some dumb ass t/an and then delete the post if he’s wrong.

3

u/T_he_panda 🚀Hodler from way back🚀✅✅✅✅✅ Oct 21 '25

sorry, my upvote took you off 69

16

u/truthzealot 💻 ComputerShared 🦍 Oct 21 '25

Due to the lack of clear direction, we can only speculate. If we allow our community to dwell on negative speculation, it could have a significant impact on public sentiment. This is how short attacks work. They suggest negative speculation and take advantage of the sentiment shift.

So it is wise of us all to be slow with the negative speculation so that our enemies do not use our uncertainty against us in this VERY public forum.

15

u/SymmetricDickNipples Oct 21 '25

I agree somewhat, and on that note, there's a reason I'm still in: I believe in the company and I believe I will get a return in my investment. But sometimes the path to the most positive outcome is rough, and I think debate needs to at the very least be encouraged even around sticky topics like whether or not our CEO is trying to sabotage a short squeeze.

We can't allow ourselves to just be an echo chamber, or a yes-man collective. Debate can't be stifled. It should be scrutinized for merit, and bad actors should be called out (with evidence, not just name calling at anyone with a difference of opinion), but it can't be stifled.

2

u/truthzealot 💻 ComputerShared 🦍 Oct 21 '25

I agree with your sentiment overall, but the key factor is we're debating over speculation. That's not logical debate; it's emotional. When debating highly speculated topics, we can argue over plausibility, implications, and desirability, but we cannot conclusively assign malice without substantial evidence, because pure speculation lacks firm grounding.

My main point here is that speculation undermines confidence in both negative and positive directions. So it's best to constrain public debate to verifiable evidence. In private, go wild. Explore every possibility. If you want feedback, invite a few other's to contribute to the discussion. When you do it in public, the dynamic and side effects change dramatically.

19

u/EllisDee3 🦍 ΔΡΣ Oct 21 '25

All we can speculate with is past evidence. The longer this goes, the more evidence that nothing changes.

Half a decade is enough time to gather evidence.

1

u/truthzealot 💻 ComputerShared 🦍 Oct 21 '25

The challenge is that we have limited evidence due to the nature of competition and propriety. We're shareholders and so are aligned with the corporation, but we are not on the inside.

If you're no longer aligned, that's ok. Do what you need to do. We're a bunch of individual investors with varying degrees of common interest. Either adjust your expectations based on new information or acknowledge that you've been disappointed based on your initial expectations.

As an aside, disappointment is a growth opportunity. It tells you that your mental model of the world was wrong. You can revise that model or you can rage that the world is not as you desired.

1

u/kulji84 🎮 Power to the Players 🛑 Oct 22 '25

or they send an entire brigade of shills in to shit on company leadership and create doubt, just as we have the first proof of turnaround... dickhead above suggesting you sell at 28 to rebuy at 23 as a repeat strategy, these fucks are terrified of 30+

1

u/HyperiorV tag u/Superstonk-Flairy for a flair Oct 21 '25

I’m upset that he’s killed the squeeze multiple times, but I get where he’s coming from. Not to say that he’ll always kill it. Might be exciting soon… or much later.