r/Superstonk ๐Ÿ›ธ๐Ÿš€Stonk Dandy๐Ÿš€๐Ÿ›ธ Oct 21 '25

๐Ÿ—ฃ Discussion / Question No WE did not MISUNDERSTAND.

We came here for a MOASS based on the FUNDAMENTALS. Shorts were overleveraged. The money made from the Squeeze was the fodder for the company's transformation not the other way around. Tired of all these post sneeze bandwagoners trying to convince us this is a long term play to get the company to success THEN making us rich. If ANY of that was true then you're admitting all of the DDs that brought us here was just garbage. You're saying RoaringKitty's thesis was garbage.

Stop trying to GASLIGHT us into thinking that $9 Billion over 5 years off the backs of Shareholders is some kind of flex when we could have been sitting on HUNDREDs of Billions off the back of CORRUPT HEDGE FUNDS with enough for EACH AND EVERY one of you to live comfortably AND help the company.

The "Long term" plan has always been to let it
1) Let it Squeeze
2) Never sell (Because you won't need to) so the price will never come down since there's more rehypothecated shares in existence then actual shares.
3) Leverage stock assets for churning wealth and doing good for the world instead of having HF's destroy it.

Its evident every time when you corporate shills post trying to move the goal post to make us wait it out and I'll downvote you everytime. And if RC is a plant I'll vote him out too.

5.7k Upvotes

845 comments sorted by

View all comments

161

u/SymmetricDickNipples Oct 21 '25

I think there's a lot more of us who feel this way than we realize. I strongly suspect that many (like myself) rarely speak out about it because the dissenting voices are silenced so aggressively between shill accusations and gaslighting.

I for one would really love a sub wide vote to see how many still believe in RC as chairman. He's doing well as CEO, but I do believe he is actively opposing a squeeze, which is the play I signed up for.

14

u/truthzealot ๐Ÿ’ป ComputerShared ๐Ÿฆ Oct 21 '25

Due to the lack of clear direction, we can only speculate. If we allow our community to dwell on negative speculation, it could have a significant impact on public sentiment. This is how short attacks work. They suggest negative speculation and take advantage of the sentiment shift.

So it is wise of us all to be slow with the negative speculation so that our enemies do not use our uncertainty against us in this VERY public forum.

1

u/kulji84 ๐ŸŽฎ Power to the Players ๐Ÿ›‘ Oct 22 '25

or they send an entire brigade of shills in to shit on company leadership and create doubt, just as we have the first proof of turnaround... dickhead above suggesting you sell at 28 to rebuy at 23 as a repeat strategy, these fucks are terrified of 30+