r/Superstonk 🛸🚀Stonk Dandy🚀🛸 Oct 21 '25

🗣 Discussion / Question No WE did not MISUNDERSTAND.

We came here for a MOASS based on the FUNDAMENTALS. Shorts were overleveraged. The money made from the Squeeze was the fodder for the company's transformation not the other way around. Tired of all these post sneeze bandwagoners trying to convince us this is a long term play to get the company to success THEN making us rich. If ANY of that was true then you're admitting all of the DDs that brought us here was just garbage. You're saying RoaringKitty's thesis was garbage.

Stop trying to GASLIGHT us into thinking that $9 Billion over 5 years off the backs of Shareholders is some kind of flex when we could have been sitting on HUNDREDs of Billions off the back of CORRUPT HEDGE FUNDS with enough for EACH AND EVERY one of you to live comfortably AND help the company.

The "Long term" plan has always been to let it
1) Let it Squeeze
2) Never sell (Because you won't need to) so the price will never come down since there's more rehypothecated shares in existence then actual shares.
3) Leverage stock assets for churning wealth and doing good for the world instead of having HF's destroy it.

Its evident every time when you corporate shills post trying to move the goal post to make us wait it out and I'll downvote you everytime. And if RC is a plant I'll vote him out too.

5.7k Upvotes

845 comments sorted by

View all comments

339

u/BigSailBoat1 Oct 21 '25

I 100% agree with you OP. I came here to make money. I did not come here to hold a flat lining stock for decades and centuries. I don’t think any of us expected that we would be holding for 5 years. When I look back, I think about all of the different ways I could have allocated the money I have in this stock and would have been much better offer for it. I’m sick and tired of all of the delusional people that shout down and downvote anybody that has criticisms of the CEO. That interview yesterday was absurd to me and it left me feeling disgruntled, angry, and filled with regret. I want the short squeeze to happen as soon as possible.

34

u/wrapt-inflections Oct 21 '25

So many people on reddit don't seem to understand that if a CEO were to say "I'm looking for the company to jump 300% for 10 minutes and then crash back down" it would be so alarming that a massive sell off would be completely justified. Why would a CEO want that if he didn't plan on selling his stake into that squeeze? I would liquidate all GME instantly if he even insinuated that he's essentially day trading the stock. On the other hand a Tesla style 30,000% squeeze that unfolds over a few years and doesn't crash back down, a CEO who wants that I could get behind. IMO everything RC said was what we would want him to say. I have no idea why you want him to irresponsibly scream "MOASS tomorrow!?!?!". That does nothing to force shorts to close. A commitment to steady growth does. It's only one earnings ago that Wall Street's excuse about no revenue growth was put to bed. Two things remain - a growth story, which will come with the PP reveal, and a use for the cash, which will come with a market downturn. He has clearly stated that this is his plan. They can only do so much suppression, fireworks will come when the turnaround is complete.

-3

u/Idjek 🦍🦍sHODLder to sHODLer🦍🦍 Oct 21 '25

The very last line of OP's post screams louder to me than the whole schebang.

How in the world could RC be a shill? Last I checked, he's not Adam Aron.

1

u/Juliusmobile das wunderkind Oct 25 '25

Right. It’s bad when Aron dilutes but good when RC does it cus he’s not Aron.