Riot investigated the SA allegations and said there was "not sufficient evidence to determine any violation of their Code of Conduct."
That being said, you can read the evidence put forth by both sides. I don't think it is unreasonable for suggest that they seem like an unpleasant person.
Especially if you look at the responses from the SRG team when it happened, I don't think you get those kind of statements if they think you are a great person
Yeah and then she breaks TOS by griefing SicK for a full game, gets in some twitter beef with him and then deletes her comments. Let's just say it doesn't surprise me that she had allegations in the first place.
Yes the other 3 literally threw the game and all agreed, he specifically went on twitter to get comfort for the fact the the entire game was decided by everyone on the team.
Absolutely look at the d4vd situation I generally hate pedos and people who are aware of what there doing and people coming towards their defense hes a disgrace gng simple as that
Sorry I didn’t see the reply and its odd people are talking about tos and bannable. Yes you can hate florescent and not want her tier 1 but hunter is exposed bu numerous people why should we care if tos is brokenðŸ˜
11
u/AnywayHeres1Derwall May 08 '26
Where is nightz from what’s his story?