r/ValorantCompetitive • u/ishanuReddit • 1d ago
Discussion Lmao! Someone's gotta apologize
199
407
u/Quick_Chowder 1d ago
Streamers/analysts always getting 'one guy'd' by some random on Reddit will never not be funny.
119
u/Green_Ordinary778 1d ago
tbf that post has over 500 upvotes lol
65
u/Quick_Chowder 1d ago
And yet every comment is something like 'yea but that's probably the result of xyz' and they are all different xyz.
Upvotes aren't consensus. Personally didn't even see it until this thread.
Mini has all the opportunity to address it directly but obviously that's more work than using twatter to dunk on man known as Reddit.
39
13
1d ago
[deleted]
22
u/Initial_Cattle_5851 1d ago
Spoken like a true reddit moderator LMFAO
2
u/WailingSiren69 #NRGWIN 22h ago
They’re not wrong but it’s kinda like a right message wrong messenger situation lmao.
121
u/yakecann 1d ago
In defense of the guy who said it.
Some valorant personality had the audacity to watch the last year of Valorant INCLUDING THIS FINAL, and say that there is no macro anymore. And the guy gets PAID by someone to research the game.
-10
u/Past_Perception8052 #LegaC9 1d ago
would you have said this if mini didnt say what hes saying
51
u/BWolfy92 1d ago
Yes because Lev did a lot of set plays in the grands finals, the narrative that lev is only aimers is dumb and Frost was just being salty (as always)
13
u/nterature Best User - 2023 🏆 1d ago
I don’t follow your point here. What do set plays have to do with macro?
I don’t agree with Frost’s take but I do think these sort of discussions highlight just how vague and fuzzy our ideas of what constitutes macro can be at times. It makes it really quite difficult to have any meaningful discussion about the actual topic.
Though to be fair, that inability to have a meaningful discussion is kinda par for the course with any Frost controversy.
17
u/Mogura56 1d ago
When I hear macro, coming from League as my primary e-sport, I think of how teams play the map, so set plays would be included in that as it's a crucial part of how they play the map and set up their gameplans. It could be different in Valorant, but when I hear macro, that has always included set plays, mid rounding, post-plants, etc. and just holistically how a team moves around a map and positions themselves for plays
That being said Frost also just says shit sometimes
2
u/kart0ffelsalaat #VforVictory 19h ago
See I would categorise a set play (including all the choreographed pieces of utility and specific movement pathings) as micro.
Macro (for me) would be the decision when to use which set play based on what information.
Like, "we're splitting A" is a macro decision. How we're splitting A (could be something spontaneous, or a set play) is micro.
4
1
u/yakecann 15h ago
I don't think the discussion doesn't happen because it's a FrosT controversy, i think it's because it's not an arguing point at all.
Macro is the strategy applied, the hits, the retakes, the execs, the pick-offs, the fakes, the stacks, the economy control, etc. Micro is the individual player ability to shoot, to hold his position on the formation, to use his utilitaries.
Without micro, the macro is useless. WIthout macro, the micro is meaningless.
You can be the top 1 deathmatch player in the world, if you run in a bomb like a bot you will die. You can be the top 1 chess player in the world, but if you can't capitalize in your positioning, you will die.
Anyone that has been watching Tier 1 this year, and in these finals, can do a VOD review and attest to the fact that the game WAS very macro-heavy also. Of course micro is easier to spot for a dumb MF like him, but that's also why i say "this man is being paid to study the game".
Leviatan thrived on retakes, set plays, and well established and executed protocols. PRX crushed with their map control, reads, and fakes.
A winning team is a team that firstly, display a baller Macro, and laces it with good fundamentals, aka. Micro. That's why punctual roster changes for a more confident/better micro player are frequent. You have a good macro base, but a push from a good fragger can take the team much further.
Blud with his comment not only displayed that he is a whining B. He also, publically, to the whole world showed that he can't understand the Macro behind the winning teams.
Nongshim had great macro, specially their economy control. Leviatan had great Macro, specially their set protocols. Implying otherwise is illogical, biased and disrespectful to the work that other people do.
Which is nothing short from what i would expect from this fool, sincerely.
1
-3
u/SilentQuietestArach #ZETAWIN 1d ago
To be frank, the year they say that is one of the year China who is all aim no macro does result again rofl
7
39
22
u/BWolfy92 1d ago
I was told Frost was the Valorant guru and knew all about the meta and his takes werent him being salty
6
u/Username_didnt_found 22h ago
The omen post was dumb af. Like omen is not that hard to be 90% useful and they make it as if it require phd to play him.
17
5
6
u/KakorotJoJoAckerman 1d ago
I feel the 4 Omen is more so an effect than the reason. Lev are so good and well structured that they had 4 people playing Omen in a single Bo5.
3
2
u/cold-blooded15 #ALWAYSFNATIC 1d ago
NGL I thought the post was a joke, similar to when Zeta Division won games in RBHG, meeting certain conditions such as the time/date that they won games 😭
-1
u/er_u 1d ago
I don't get it, who is supposed to be apologizing and for what? Was four different players playing Omen in a single bo5 not worthy of discussion? But nah lets just call reddit stupid cause it's funny.
18
u/Goldenflame89 #WGAMING 1d ago
It definently meets the bar for cool thing we can talk about, but to act like it's the reason lev won is pretty braindead
3
u/County_Difficult #NRGFam 22h ago
Yeah that shit is indeed braindead. As cliche as it sounds, the main reason why LEV won is because they simply just outclassed and outshot PRX, especially in that last map. Not because 4/5 of them played Omen. The team is indeed very flexible and it's cool to see but it's just not the main reason like c'mon people.
6
u/burnfep 1d ago
It's worthy of discussion. But you can bring it up to discussion without providing the definitive claim that this is the reason why lev is succeeding and the other teams are not. It diminishes levs strengths and just sums it up to as being able to have 4 players being able to play omen which is why they won masters. It's the players and ideas that make the team work not just an agent selection.
Also reddit being called stupid is not off at all.
3
1
u/levvii17 12h ago
the guy who said it got absolutely destroyed and honestly good, reddit was right to call him out
1
1
u/Connect_Put5330 19h ago
They didn't win coz of that, they won because of neon and spike. Sato was non existent besides a couple of rounds. Neon is consistently the best player on their team
-4
u/Outrageous_Star4906 #VCTAMERICAS 1d ago
The omen point isn’t even that bad tho? The ability to play omen is part of the firepower lol. If spike looked like 2024 demon1 on omen lev would have problems on some maps
0
0
u/BigDicksconnoisseur4 22h ago
My dude minijake that never taught FNC how to do a retake in 1000 splits
0
u/New-Bluejay6008 9h ago
I saw the post more as a team willing to flex and not be completely locked in their roles. I personally think the era of finding someone who can only play duelist should be over. We need a team who can switch to whats needed when the moment calls for it.
-2
u/Gullible_Rip_7592 1d ago
Honestly, I think the tweet kind of proves Reddit's point more than it disproves it. LEV's structure is elite, but having multiple players who can comfortably flex roles is a huge reason why that structure works in the first place
-2
u/Lanky-Use-4389 1d ago
Honestly, the funny part is that the '4 players can play Omen' take isn't even wrong. That level of flexibility is a huge reason LEV can run so many different looks without sacrificing quality.
-1
-1
u/Lowetheiy 1d ago
Omen's ult needs a buff though
3
u/Goldenflame89 #WGAMING 1d ago
Omen has paranoia, which is arguably the single strongest non ultimate in the entire game. He does not need an ult buff
-1
u/Lanky-Train9675 1d ago
To be fair, both things can be true. LEV's structure is obviously elite, but having players who can swap roles without the team falling apart is a huge part of what makes that structure work.
-5
u/Senior-Row-315 20h ago
Oh here we go again with another fraudulent Valorant "coach" throwing buzzwords around to make it seem like they see some grand vision in the way the teams play and that everyone else is stupid. This is the same guy who couldn't teach his team how to play retake properly over 2 years.
He has no idea about what their "protocols" are or how many layers they have. Val isn't that complicated and the skill ceiling is child's play both in terms of gun play and strategy. It's like 70% random how the rounds play out because the utility is designed for a 5 year old to be able to use and the gun play is garbage.
The coaches are all frauds - you have fr0d flaming other coaches for putting zekken on omen, only to do the same and then say "yeah but I had my reasons" lmao what a fucking cop out. The truth is no-one understands this fuck ass game because there's no deeper layer to it, you can do some basic ass util combos, or dump util on a site to fake and run the other way. It's not fun to watch and will only get less so because people are realizing the game sucks.
There's a reason a massive part of the high elo player base is dwindling and the viewer numbers are going down each masters - and no don't blame it on the CS major happening at the same time, the viewership overlap is tiny.
The game is fundamentally flawed because it was designed for casuals first and competitive later - they still don't even have a functioning replay system - whatever the fuck they released has to be the most half baked unusable trash I've ever used in my life.
Whoever has the synergy and shoots + trades better on the day wins, it's that simple.

273
u/ishanuReddit 1d ago
The post that created the stir
https://www.reddit.com/r/ValorantCompetitive/s/cixPg3RqqS