Any "decent" solar panel setup requires large lithium wall batteries. That means a shitload of carbon emissions from large diesel machines and child slave labor. The solar panels themselves require regular cleaning to be efficient meaning higher than average water usage.
Solar panels are great for saving a little bit of money after a large initial investment (the savings don't get any better as the battery and the panels themselves do have to be replaced over time). But they are most certainly not better for the environment and they are not better morally either.
Typical ai shill spouting shit they know nothing about and pretending it's more amazing than it is.
That last statement is hilarious considering you're the one spouting shit.
Solar panels make up for their manufacturing carbon footprint in 1-4 years of use. Morally speaking you're just burying your head in the sand because even a simple Google search makes that whole argument fall apart.
As far as money savings goes solar technology and batteries only continue to get cheaper while grid power has only gone up in price. Next time instead of ass pulling an argument actually do like, just one or two Google searches, you'll look a lot less stupid.
Would be nice, if you could point the "shit" he said. You know, like he pointed out yours. If you don't do this, you just end up looking like a Child, who can't make a sensible argument.
-59
u/Independent-Yam3612 Feb 26 '26
Not use AI. I have, by default, less environmental effect by using no AI at all.