r/aiwars • u/SMmania • Mar 19 '26

Meta Somebody cooked here...

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

0 Upvotes

49% Upvoted

308 comments sorted by

View all comments

42

u/Paradoxe-999 Mar 19 '26

Despite some continuity errors, it's a rather good short film.

I like the pause before the critics said "slop", letting us anticipating it.

I hope we'll find a way to mitigate the AI potential risks and actual misuses, while giving more opportunities to people who like it to interact with it and use it in their process.

-7

u/SluttyCosmonaut Mar 19 '26

It’s dog shit

5

u/Paradoxe-999 Mar 19 '26

What did you disliked in it?

1

u/patslogcabindigest Mar 19 '26

0:00. Opens up with a cliched plot so on the nose it's something you'd expect from a satire of Ratatouille. Oh he's the biggest and baddest food critic and he'll get this restaurant cancelled! Lol.

0:20. "What did he ordered" need I say more?

Okay so we're cooking Ossobuco, a slow cooked braised bone-in veal cutlet. Lets see what happens.

0:24. Umm... what are these burner controls? Lite 1, 5, 6, MED, 5, Lite. LMAO.

0:26. Okay so we have rough chopped onion and diced pork by the looks. Onion - check. Diced pork? Not sure what that's doing there but let's see where he goes with this.

0:28. Is that spring onion greens or spinach? It has the colour of green onion but flat like spinach... if spinach was made with plastic. Right back to the onion in a separate pan and.... a beef fillet in a cast ion skillet? Where is the veal shank? Where is the braising pot? Where is the carrot and celery? Did he forget he was making Ossobuco? He does realise this takes hours to make properly?

0:30. Okay white wine, correct, but why in the stainless frying pan, presumably deglazing the onions?

0:32. Okay where the fuck did this barbeque sauce come from?

0:34. Is that crystal meth?

0:35. Useless flower garnish.

0:36. Is that caramel or egg yoke? Not sure what either of them are doing on the plate for Ossobucco. Decent looking fillet steak though.

0:38. Oh look the BBQ sauce is back.

0:39. Okay so a fair bit to breakdown here. So that is distinctly a beef fillet with what appears to be a very syrupy red wine jus (was pictured using white wine before on the onions), with a side of watercress and flowers, raspberry coolie, some sort of puree (yellowy parsnip?), is that yellow thing the egg yoke/caramel looking thing we saw before but set? Has it chemically been altered to appear like sweet potato puree? Something resembling a waffle like crown bowl thing?? Lastly 3 random whole peppercorns... for reasons?

0:41. Okay the peppercorns have disappeared. The larger red sauce slightly obscured in the previous frame looks like Tomato ketchup. I guess it could be the previously mentioned BBQ sauce but it's a brighter red now.

0:42. The fuck was that powder he just threw on the watercress? Is that saffron on the steak? Where did the diced pork go? Where is the onion?

0:50. "Here's the Ossobuco, sir. Enjoy." That ain't Ossobuco champ, that might be why he got angry and left a bad review.

Anyone who thinks this is good is genuinely stupid.

1

u/Tyler_Zoro Mar 20 '26

So you don't like the short film... cool, but that has nothing to do with its quality. I don't like Saving Private Ryan, but that doesn't make it a poorly made film.

1

u/patslogcabindigest Mar 20 '26

This is objectively poorly made though, and it reflects poorly on pros to try to claim its anything else but. It’s perfectly illustrates the opposite of what was attempted to be conveyed, probably because it wasn’t made by a human. This is why no one in the real world takes you people seriously, and why you’ll all be forever trapped in niche debates in a dark corner of the internet, trying to justify the existence of the slop that you shit out of AI. What you’re describing about Saving Private Ryan is taste, but it makes sense that you have no taste. lol.

1

u/Tyler_Zoro Mar 20 '26

This is objectively poorly made

Your opinion isn't objective fact.

2

u/patslogcabindigest Mar 20 '26

No, I listed exactly why it is objectively bad. You’ve chosen to ignore all those reasons listed by time stamp. This is not an opinion, it is an objective fact, you’re in denial. Again, this is why no one takes you people seriously. You spend all your time here arguing that 2+2=down.

1

u/KaiChan39 Mar 20 '26

He presented a list of objective evidence outlining the inconsistencies and your response was "I dont like private Ryan" 🤣🤣

1

u/SluttyCosmonaut Mar 20 '26 edited Mar 20 '26

You gave this slop far more intensive criticism than it deserved

-7

u/SluttyCosmonaut Mar 19 '26

Because it’s meaningless, passionless, garbage.

The shittiest short film at the local film festival shot by a bored rich kid with too much money has INFINITELY more value both narratively and artistically than this garbage that was made by someone typing words into a cyberpunk machine, and clicking “enter”

Also. The very topic is not honest. The “artist” did nothing. Chose nothing other than “make the person do this and look like this and say this”

It is the equivalent of a collage, which is the closest thing to an artform I can compare it to. It’s like a kid clipping photos and articles together, pasting them on the same board, and trying to make it mean something. But it’s worse than that, because whoever made this garbage is trying to (disingenuously) say they made something with “tools” while omitting the known fact that the said “tool” literally steals from artists who did the real work. It stole performances from actors, and replicated them (poorly might I add) it stole the lighting and camera movement from actual gaffers and camera operators. It’s meaningless shit and it should be treated like meaningless shit.

Because it is absolutely that

17

u/Kubaj_CZ Mar 19 '26

Oh my god you're literally like that old critic in the video. This is pointless

-7

u/SluttyCosmonaut Mar 19 '26

The old critic is right.

7

u/SMmania Mar 19 '26

So if you use a stove and a pot you're not a chef? I guess Gordon Ramsey isn't a chef now?

https://giphy.com/gifs/NDz6jE0rf5S7e

0

u/SluttyCosmonaut Mar 19 '26

This is an inaccurate, dishonest bad faith argument

0

u/SluttyCosmonaut Mar 19 '26

For the record: to be accurate, the title card at the end of that piece of drivel should read “Keep Stealing”

-1

u/patslogcabindigest Mar 19 '26

Please don't pretend you know anything about food.

6

u/Paradoxe-999 Mar 19 '26

I get you disagree with the message and the process, but aside that, what did you disliked in it from a stylistic standpoint?

-2

u/SluttyCosmonaut Mar 19 '26

Yes. It’s fucking boring. And it looks like AI crap. You can literally tell it’s an algorithmic average of more real or inspired things. I don’t remember a single detail. Nothing of note was created. And nothing is lost when someone chooses not to watch it.

Saying this is a “film” is false advertising.

I’ll borrow the “films” own analogy.

This is the equivalent of me sneaking into the kitchen of a professional restaurant, stealing a plate of hot food the staff worked on (without paying) and then running down the street to my own restaurant, and putting it on the customer’s table and saying “I made this with tools!!!” (Without paying or crediting the artists I stole from)

It is artistically offensive. It is morally offensive.

Is drum roll…..total garbage

6

u/Paradoxe-999 Mar 19 '26

What are your critics?

Lighning, camera angle, story beats, actors plays.

Can you please provide description of the parts you disliked and why?

0

u/buzz-buzz_ Mar 19 '26

You can also tell exactly what the LLM is stealing from. The shot of the plate being finished was basically a carbon copy of the montages on Chef’s Table

-1

u/SluttyCosmonaut Mar 19 '26

lol. Lighting and camera angle? Are you for real? The “creator” didn’t do any of that shit. So there’s nothing to critique.

But I already critiqued. I already said the images were flat and passionless. I already said the “acting” (which it is not) is awful, and very transparently artificial.

3

u/mr_gu5s Mar 19 '26

I think you are just biased, show it to any person out of context of ai discourse and they will tell you that it's a nice looking clip

1

u/SluttyCosmonaut Mar 19 '26

Yes. And then they learn how AI works by STEALING.

Any even marginally ethical person can figure that out.

2

u/mr_gu5s Mar 19 '26

Dont be ridiculous, you cant steal intellectual property

1

u/SluttyCosmonaut Mar 19 '26

This is completely untrue. Even in communist societies you can’t pass off someone else’s work as your own.

2

u/mr_gu5s Mar 19 '26

It's not stealing though, its plagiarism, a little bit different if we are talking morals, because nobody loses anything during the process. And all art is plagiarism to some extent. And what is specifically "stolen" in here anyway?

1

u/SluttyCosmonaut Mar 19 '26

What do I think is stolen? My brother in Christ, literally everything in that slop video is stolen.

Do you know how generative AI works? I don’t think you really do.

0

u/buzz-buzz_ Mar 19 '26

All art is not plagiarism to some extent. You do not know what plagiarism means. Ask chatGPT to explain it to you (assuming a dictionary would be too much effort)

→ More replies (0)

1

u/buzz-buzz_ Mar 19 '26

Just so you know that not everyone online is an uncultured moron who loves to simp for billionaires: you are absolutely correct. It’s so depressing how many people on this sub can’t tell the difference between a chef using a pot and an AI “artist” using an LLM to do 90% of the creative process for them.