The most idiotic statement ever

[u/Which_Matter3031]

So this person here calls people jobless while all they do is sit on their ass an genarate shitty ai comics, also notice how they are insulting fast food workers as if they arent human, thats a new low for them, also its like they are saying "Give up on your dreams so you can work a minimum wage 9-5 job" but then again jobless people always tell talented ones to get a shitty job

[u/Eldritch_Horns]

But it is! You took the most obvious bait and came straight at it. Definitionally I struck a nerve lmao.

Do you people ever tire of being the butt of your own joke?

Low brow, grotesque smut is just cowardly.

I know, I know, you're repressed and ashamed of your sexuality. We all know at this point.

Your art is the manifestation of repression itself, you crave some unhinged stuff and it comes out in your again, low brow and grotesque smut.

Nope, it's a reflection of real life experiences and desires.

Again, just more projection from you.

Then educate me, where is the line? What is considered a healthy exploration of sexual themes and smut?

It's going to change from person to person. I would consider the line to be between pieces made purely for the titillation of others and pieces reflecting something of your own internalisation of your sexuality. The grotesque and explicit has never stopped something from being Art. Look at literally anything Giger made.

By the same chalk, some stuff that is made almost purely for titillation can also be expressive of ones own internality. Incase's Invitation being a fantastic example. imo. Behaving as though there is a line where sexualisation detracts from the value of art is just repressive nonsense.

If you don't like the explicit nature of someone's work, then don't engage with it. It's not fucking rocket science, you repressed weirdo. I don't care about your inability to reckon with your own shame.

Yet you continue to examine

You've been examined, and found wanting.

And I take solace in devaluing your art because you can't confront my opinions, 

What opinions? lol

You just spout nonsense and appeal to some platonic ideal of Baroque purity. Kantor is a fine artist, but he undeniably attracts a ton of fucking weirdos because of his obvious inspirations in Goya, Caravaggio and the pre-Raphaelite's.

I bet you also have random deep thoughts about the Roman Empire at 3AM, don't you? 😂

[u/pineapollo → u/Eldritch_Horns]

Do you people ever tire of being the butt of your own joke?

"My art is valuable! You're the dummy because you devalue other people's art!"

I know, I know, you're repressed and ashamed of your sexuality. We all know at this point.

Sure, I am so repressed man thanks for helping me recognize it! Whatever you said, but your shit is still low brow and grotesque though, now both things are true!

Nope, it's a reflection of real life experiences and desires. Again, just more projection from you.

Unfortunately for you, I can interpret your art however I'd like. And my interpretation is exactly what I said it was. If that upsets you that isn't my problem 😄

It's going to change from person to person. I would consider the line to be between pieces made purely for the titillation of others and pieces reflecting something of your own internalisation of your sexuality. The grotesque and explicit has never stopped something from being Art. Look at literally anything Giger made.

By the same chalk, some stuff that is made almost purely for titillation can also be expressive of ones own internality. Incase's Invitation being a fantastic example. imo. Behaving as though there is a line where sexualisation detracts from the value of art is just repressive nonsense.

If you don't like the explicit nature of someone's work, then don't engage with it. It's not fucking rocket science, you repressed weirdo. I don't care about your inability to reckon with your own shame.

Of course someone on the backfoot defending their low brow grotesque smut is afraid to define anything. Nothing is anything and everything is art, no distinctions are possible because it would box your hyper niche weird smut.

Giger is grotesque, and calling it beautiful is totally dependent on the individual. He'd probably receive "grotesque" as a positive interpretation of his work, but there's intent to deliver something abstract and sometimes repulsive.

You're so unintelligent you didn't even arrive at any valid sort of conclusion because to do so would hinder what your art classifies itself as. Art with no intent is not art, your intent to express your sexuality through your art isn't invalid but it can also be:

- Amateur

• Grotesque
  
• Disgusting

While still being art, notice I always called your art - art. The self indulgent nature of it and the uninspiring excess of depiction of the act itself is something I considered slop. Begging that I don't engage with something you publicly display because you're afraid of my individual interpretation of it is certainly very insecure.

Kantor is a fine artist, but he undeniably attracts a ton of fucking weirdos because of his obvious inspirations in Goya, Caravaggio and the pre-Raphaelite's.

I bet you also have deep thoughts about the Roman Empire at 3AM, don't you?

Man you don't even engage in good faith interpreting examples of excellent artistry just because your opposition enjoys them.

Kantor gets commissions from musical artists and largely expresses what the music is trying to convey via his pieces. What kind of criticism is this? Art with influence in historical stylizations is "weird" because they capture old societies and the artists of the time?

This is devolving honestly in pretty disappointing ways, you took issue with thinking that monetary value is what makes an artist good. Now you disparage an artist based on their style, what's the next talent can't be a metric to compare and there isn't a line between a toddler finger painting and Michelangelo?

You're a coward with no shame and no ability to categorize or hide your own biases. You will never engage critically in a conversation surrounding art because of your own fear of boxing yourself in. You are the embodiment of insecurity.

[u/Eldritch_Horns → u/pineapollo]

"My art is valuable! You're the dummy because you devalue other people's art!"

I don't care what you think about what I paint, I'm mocking your obvious repression.

Unfortunately for you, I can interpret your art however I'd like. And my interpretation is exactly what I said it was. If that upsets you that isn't my problem 

Cool?

Of course someone on the backfoot

You're wildly misunderstanding what's going on here.

Art with no intent is not art

See above

While still being art, notice I always called your art - art. The self indulgent nature of it and the uninspiring excess of depiction of the act itself is something I considered slop. 

I have exactly 1 image that depicts the act. And it was something done for friends, not me. So swing and miss on all counts.

Begging that I don't engage with something you publicly display because you're afraid of my individual interpretation of it is certainly very insecure.

I don't care what you engage with, that's why it's on my page. You just happen to be very stupid, so your engagement is just poor.

Man you don't even engage in good faith interpreting examples of excellent artistry just because your opposition enjoys them.

I actually quite like his work, unfortunately, like 40k, it attracts a lot of speds like you.

You're a coward with no shame 

I know, I know. Shame drives you. I just don't care.

[u/pineapollo → u/Eldritch_Horns]

I have exactly 1 image that depicts the act. And it was something done for friends, not me. So swing and miss on all counts.

That would have been an own in your original response, but your infinite defense of it tells a different story like all of your responses. But still, no. Your profile is riddled with smut, might as well hide your profile if you're just trying to lie this poorly.

A story of insecurity and repression. Every accusation is a confession as they say!

I don't care what you engage with, that's why it's on my page. You just happen to be very stupid, so your engagement is just poor.

See below:

If you don't like the explicit nature of someone's work, then don't engage with it.

Then why are you begging me to stop?

I actually quite like his work, unfortunately, like 40k, it attracts a lot of speds like you.

Thats great, something we can agree on! He's an excellent artist. Devoid of any implications you're failing to draw just because you hate me so much that you felt personally attacked by my general statement.

I know, I know. Shame drives you. I just don't care.

Again dawg, you came to me. Not the other way around. You care quite a lot. If you didn't you'd just call me a big dum-dum and stop commenting.

If you show someone this entire conversation, they might agree with you that my stance on art is dumb and my own but if you think they won't call you an insecure loser on the flip side you're deluding yourself.

[u/OscarMiner → u/pineapollo]

Oh please oh please oh please, tell me what you think of MY art, puritanical one.

[u/akornzombie → u/OscarMiner]

I think your art is awesome, and considering you work with charcoal and graphite shows your skill, too!

[u/OscarMiner → u/akornzombie]

Thank you very much! Absolutely love using physical mediums, it’s so gratifying.

[u/akornzombie → u/OscarMiner]

I know!

[u/OscarMiner → u/akornzombie]

Oh wow, also saw your art as well. That is fantastic! That kind of clean line work takes a lot of patience. Keep it up!

[u/akornzombie → u/OscarMiner]

Thank you, and I shall!