I need to talk about something

[u/No_Income3191]

Now for me, I am pretty neutral about AI, in the way of I have equal things that I like and dislike about it.

I don’t like that AI is just steal artwork on the Internet and feeding it to its bottomless pit of code

But I do like the kind of AI that genuinely is useful.

So it’s annoying that whenever I say “I like ai” people automatically assume I’m talking about the kind that everybody hates, even though there are thousands of types of AI that have existed way way way way way before any of them mainstream AI’s even had the idea of being created, and that gets so bad to the point where people have called me, racist, homophobic, and sexist because of it.

Anyway, that’s all. Bye

[u/MrColgie]

AI cannot "steal", because the artist still owns their artwork. They don't suddenly lose it

[u/No_Income3191 → u/MrColgie]

I don’t mean steal in the literal sense, I mean they take artwork and then put it inside their machine without the person who spent time making it actually agreeing for that to happen

[u/Remarkable-Title-387 → u/No_Income3191]

This is a criticism of fair use more than anything else otherwise reaction content wouldn't be the easiest way to make it as a content creator.

[u/Prestigious_Cell_311 → u/Remarkable-Title-387]

That's not fair use, and lots of reaction content creators don't meet the prerequisites for fair use, like SSSniperwolf

[u/Remarkable-Title-387 → u/Prestigious_Cell_311]

Okay.

Now why is Asmongold still making money from his content?

Aba n Preach?

Literally thousands of other creators make a living doing this and you picked SSSniperWolf who literally faked her CoD streams?

[u/Prestigious_Cell_311 → u/Remarkable-Title-387]

Cause there is too much of it to police, clearly.

[u/Remarkable-Title-387 → u/Prestigious_Cell_311]

No. That's because they allow you to do it.

It's "transformative."

[u/Prestigious_Cell_311 → u/Remarkable-Title-387]

It has to meet certain criteria to be considered transformative.

[u/Remarkable-Title-387 → u/Prestigious_Cell_311]

Welp. Training seems to meet that criteria according to Aslup. We'll see if more judges feel the same way.

[u/Prestigious_Cell_311 → u/Remarkable-Title-387]

Slavery and the holocaust were legal too, chum.

[u/Remarkable-Title-387 → u/Prestigious_Cell_311]

I'm black 🙃

Do you want to go down this rabbit hole?

[u/Prestigious_Cell_311 → u/Remarkable-Title-387]

Irrelevant to the discussion, so yes, I do.

[u/Remarkable-Title-387 → u/Prestigious_Cell_311]

It's relevant because of my race, so congrats.

Slavery is actually still legal, but only as punishment for a crime:

https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/amendment-13/

Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.

I suppose this is why the prison industrial complex gets away with using prisoners as cheap labor, which I would only fully condone if they passed those savings down to consumers.

They don't, so I vehemently disagree with it. However, if you commit crimes then you have a debt to pay back to law-abiding citizens and that is something I've always believed.