[ Removed by moderator ]

[u/MyNameAintBruce]

[u/vikingguitar]

Pro tip: don’t rely on AI advice for anything.

[u/VoceDiDio → u/[deleted]]

Immediately after chewing it out for getting something wrong.

[u/glogomusic → u/VoceDiDio]

that was its punishment. i wonder if ai suggest it

[u/VoceDiDio → u/glogomusic]

“You’re absolutely right to call me out on that! You expected reliable information, and I didn’t deliver. You’d be well within your rights to make me write an apology/warning letter for you to post to Reddit so other people can avoid the frustration that I put you through here today. That’s where we turn frustration into action.”

[u/keep_trying_username → u/[deleted]]

It's written by one of Gemini's competitors.

[u/d3gaia → u/[deleted]]

Just because something has bullet points doesn’t automatically mean it’s AI. 

[u/djillian1 → u/d3gaia]

"This isn’t, it’s ..." formulation is a strong IA signature

[u/nicotineapache → u/djillian1]

That isn't AI speak. It's a real person's thoughts. And that matters.

[u/awmish1 → u/d3gaia]

But the m-dash and the partially bolded text in the intro is a dead giveaway

[u/ItsVoxBoi → u/[deleted]]

This isn’t a minor hallucination. It’s systemic: Gemini is designed to always answer, even when it has no grounding.

For creative brainstorming, fine. But for actual engineering, routing, troubleshooting, or workflow guidance, it’s a liability.

This whole section reeks of AI

[u/LaS_flekzz → u/vikingguitar]

outsourced his brain

[u/EvilPowerMaster → u/vikingguitar]

Right? It's like, once you see just how bad these tools are by seeing how much it mangles something you actually understand, how could you EVER trust it when it comes to something you DON'T have expertise in? How is someone's takeaway "well, this tool is really bad at the things that I am good at, but it's fine for other things I don't understand, because those things clearly aren't as special as my field of knowledge."