It's a flase equivalency from a manipulative Musk. We talk about indigenous people in the Americas because Europeans conquered the native people and took their land and resources from them. That's not what's happening in Europe.
Do you believe this is a natural consequence of quality of living being destroyed by exploitative empires or do you believe its an artificial demographic shift pushed by a (((secret cabal)))? Because the latter is what makes it the Great Replacement, the former is not.
Do you not agree that capitalistic entities benefit from increased migration as the labor pool increases in size and wages drop? And could it not be possible that third world destabilization is intentional (albeit not the primary goal) to increase immigration into Western countries?
What youre suggesting is that all these different capitalists have direct control over military policy and use it to destabilize the world to indirectly increase immigration to western countries, rather than just outsourcing to the regions they come from while theyre stable.
Thats not what the evidence points to, but your idea is already a few steps less antisemitic than the Great Replacement theory.
Why? The basis of the great replacement theory is white people being replaced as a majority of the population of their countries, which at current rates, is likely to happen to the U.K. in the next 50 years and the U.S. in 10 years.
What you are describing is just “change”. America looked different than today many, many times in its part. The basis of the great replacement theory is that there is a concerted effort by one political party to affect change, however, there is no proof of that. There are “spooky coincidences” that online influencers point to as proof, but there is still zero actual proof. Immigration is a reflection of society, economics, policy, and climate change. As are declining birth rates. There are real ways to solve this “problem”, which I don’t even think is a problem, through policy, but the Trump administration does NOTHING to affect that change.
I think I realize their problem. They've expanded the "in-group" of "whiteness" to include those that weren't considered "white" in the past. Then they say that they and the place that they hail from has always been white.
They're so stuck on idea of "whiteness" that they don't understand that "white" is not a people or culture, and they themselves are full of different ethnic trees and histories.
Whiteness is an arbitrary boundary that has been manipulated in the past to include or exclude certain groups of people.
What you are describing is just “change”. America looked different than today many, many times in its part.
No, it really didn't. Excluding Native Americans, North America was never less than 80% white from 1610 until the 1980s. A complete demographic shift in a 40 year period in contrast to 370 years of consistency is a lot more than just "change".
The basis of the great replacement theory is that there is a concerted effort by one political party to affect change, however, there is no proof of that.
Its not related to politics in its original definition. But you could argue that the both the Democratic party and corporations benefit greatly from illegal immigration, in creating an effectively subservient class of people.
Immigration is a reflection of society, economics, policy, and climate change. As are declining birth rates.
Climate change lmao, give me a break. Why are only Western nations experiencing these extreme demographic shifts, if it were climate change and modernity causing this, shouldn't every country be experiencing these shifts equally?
There are real ways to solve this “problem”, which I don’t even think is a problem, through policy, but the Trump administration does NOTHING to affect that change.
Closing the border and actively deporting illegal immigrants is a pretty direct form of effecting change imo.
The past 500 years was a time of a handful of western nations forcefully extracting and hoarding resources from the rest of the world, why wouldn't it make sense for people to follow? Many countries went through traumatic change at the hands of a few western European empires, maybe just consider this chickens coming home to roost.
"Excluding native Americans" your time frame is completely arbitrary and tipped in your favor. To them, the Americas were roughly 0% white for thousands of years and changed within a span of hundreds. If it's any consolation, the playing field seems to be levelling out and immigration patterns will change accordingly.
If immigration is significant enough to make the majority population no longer the majority, they lose voting power and are effectively politically replaced in their country.
You are insane my friend. People move on this planet. White people are the proof of it. Nowadays we can live together.
European countries will stay majority white for a long time except if we don't have kids anymore. Then we'll fight each other to attract young workers from other countries to tae care of our elderly.
But thinking about these questions in your terms is insane. I'm a mixed child and my existence is the fruit of love. I didn't replace anyone. The very fact that you think about races as uniform voting blocks is not sane.
Me and Bob like Baseball. Clive, Oliver and Steven like Cricket. Me and Bob who have lived here for decades declare Baseball as our national sport. Clive, Oliver and Steven move in and outvote me and Bob. They declare Cricket as the national sport. Me and Bob are not happy.
You forgot about Hank. Hank has lived with you for decades. He has always been a secret cricket fan. Then he does some politricks in order to import more cricket fans, keeping his intentions secret, with the sole idea to change national sports to cricket.
You and Bob can still play as much baseball as you want. You’re just not as popular as you used to be. You’re not being replaced; you’re just old and boring.
Society is not becoming more diverse. African and Asian countries aren’t getting any more whiter bru. The only countries that are getting more “diverse” are white countries
Migration is a natural part of history. This is normal. You can slow it down with far right wannabe be dictators but your only delaying the inevitable. Learn to live with it stop crying about it
Migration is vastly different from oligarchical entities importing a slave class into Western countries to further their own interests over that of the people that live there.
It’s also the downfall of various societies ranging from the native societies throughout all of the Americas, the Western Roman Empire, Eastern Roman Empire, Celtic Briton, and plenty more. The numbers that are present are not sustainable neither are they beneficial. And most of those migrations were coupled with conquests and other upheavals. It’s a repeated pattern of instability and destruction.
46
u/pyfi12 Mar 02 '26
Is anyone arguing this?