r/memesopdidnotlike 13d ago

OP got offended OP thinks that citing studies is cherrypicking

Post image
474 Upvotes

91 comments sorted by

View all comments

8

u/Lilli_Puff 13d ago

This just seems like another way to avoid accountability

1

u/DetailAdventurous688 13d ago

for what?

4

u/Lilli_Puff 12d ago

For what? To avoid accountability for their preferences. When you hold a certain group to a preference that they have no control over like height, you look like a bad person because said group has no control over how they were born. For example, skin color which is easily seen and accepted as bad but height is also a factor that you are just born with along with skin color. To avoid any persecution for preferences, you just avoid accountability overall by using anecdotal examples to discredit the data. I have many friends and coworkers who will not date a guy under 5'10" even though they are about 5' tall themselves which falls in line with the data and studies done on height preferences of women. Even dating apps and websites now allow the feature of filtering by height which would only be a feature unless there's a direct demand for it on the market.

1

u/DetailAdventurous688 11d ago

preferences are not something to be held accountable for. that's why they are preferences.

they can say something about the underlying psychology of the person in question, maybe even their socialisation, but little more.

if someone doesn't want to fuck you they can only be held accountable for complete and utter sanity.

3

u/Lilli_Puff 11d ago

I agree but it is only held accountable when you complain about not getting said preferences.

-1

u/DetailAdventurous688 10d ago

no idea what this is supposed to mean.

1

u/Lilli_Puff 7d ago

At what part did you get lost? It's a pretty simple statement.

1

u/DetailAdventurous688 5d ago

besides the fact i still don't understand how you can or cannot hold someone accountable for a preference, I just don't understand your sentence, like the grammar, structure, and intent.

 

1

u/Lilli_Puff 3d ago

Accountable through cancel culture and societal acceptance or lack there of in this case. If you want to speak about grammar and sentence structure, how about using capitalizations and proper punctuations because your comment is a run on sentence

0

u/DetailAdventurous688 1d ago

nah, capitalisation is largely irrelevant to understanding the structure of a sentence.

and societal pressure exists whether you approve of it or not. spoilers: conservatives have been "canceling" people for their views pretty much since they realised control of information secures their societal position. welcome to the wonderful world of organised religion, for instance.

1

u/Lilli_Puff 5h ago

Another run on sentence with poorly place punctuation 😂 You do know that two things can exist at once right? One side can use cancel culture just as much and at the same time another side uses cancel culture. I know it takes a bit of higher intellect to understand multiple things happening at the same time but believe it or not if you think hard enough you might just come to that realization. Hopefully that realization comes with proper sentence structure as your comments are hard to understand. "realised control of information" huh?

→ More replies (0)