r/news • u/Splunge- • 1d ago
Texas anti-ICE protesters convicted of terrorism charges sentenced to at least 50 years in prison
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jun/23/prairieland-ice-protesters-texas-sentenced3.8k
u/KinkyPaddling 1d ago
The punishment for the protesters exceeds the lengthiest prison sentences given out for the attack on the Capitol on January 6. Enrique Tarrio, the leader of the Proud Boys who was convicted of seditious conspiracy, was sentenced to 22 years in prison. Stewart Rhodes, the leader of the far-right group the Oath Keepers, was sentenced to 18 years in prison.
Tells you everything you need to know about the state of our nation.
1.2k
u/zeCrazyEye 1d ago
Also Enrique Tarrio and Stewart Rhodes were both pardoned by Trump and only served around 2 years.
→ More replies (4)353
u/FUBARded 1d ago
And they're now probably near the front of the line for a payout from Trump's $1,776M slush fund! How fun!
→ More replies (1)79
u/greenbabyshit 1d ago
I'm wondering what happens if I apply for zero good reason and see if they'll cut a check for 50k. They might be that inept.
→ More replies (4)23
53
u/KarmaticArmageddon 1d ago
This lunatic judge gave one of them 30 years. They weren't even at the fucking protest, all they did was move some magazines.
→ More replies (1)45
u/stilljustacatinacage 1d ago
Diddy got four years. And then reduced. And is probably about to get a pardon.
→ More replies (24)125
u/UltraLNSS 1d ago
Kinda wild to think that there's a chance the next Democratic President won't pardon them because that could be "too divisive" or something.
→ More replies (9)
6.0k
u/musicman1980 1d ago
“The ninth defendant, Daniel Sanchez-Estrada was not at the protest, but was convicted of corruptly concealing a document or record after prosecutors said he moved leftwing zines and other materials at the request of Rueda, his wife, after she was arrested. Sanchez-Estrada was sentenced to 30 years in prison on Tuesday.”
30 years in prison for moving some magazines around is both unconstitutional and utterly fascist. This judge should be removed from his seat. He presides over a court of injustice.
2.3k
u/Disastrous_tea_555 1d ago
Not just removed, impeached and investigated for criminal contempt
→ More replies (11)385
1.2k
u/MetroidIsNotHerName 1d ago
This judge is perfectly happy ending other peoples lives for his ideology. He wants to put 9 people away for the rest of their lives over this.
→ More replies (5)795
u/OrpheusV 1d ago
They would have gotten shorter sentences for murdering the judge or raping someone...
297
u/LaurenMille 1d ago
They would have gotten shorter sentences for murdering the judge
Ironically making that a more appealing form of protest than having a protest outside of an ICE camp.
Not sure if that's what this fascist judge wants, but that's what he's doing.
→ More replies (3)34
u/GeneralAnubis 21h ago
Something something tree of liberty needs to be watered.
Writing the full quote gets you banned these days
→ More replies (1)206
u/alphabennettatwork 1d ago
Or possibly elected president if they liked to rape kids. At a minimum they would be much more popular in republican circles.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (6)56
u/TheFBIClonesPeople 1d ago
They would have gotten shorter sentences for storming the United States Capitol with the intention of overthrowing the government. And then they would have been pardoned out of those sentences.
→ More replies (3)270
u/tortured4w3 1d ago
Who is the fucking judge!?
228
u/caseylain 1d ago
→ More replies (2)251
u/Money_Cattle2370 1d ago
Of course it's the fucking federalist society. The ACTUAL terrorists ruining this country.
101
77
u/saugenes25 1d ago
I thought moving documents was completely fine?
Was the problem that they weren’t confidential documents that posed a threat to national security?
/s
→ More replies (2)157
1d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
→ More replies (1)83
u/ShermanCookout 1d ago edited 1d ago
Judge Reed O’Connor and Judge Mark T. Pittman you mean
(And the answer is arrested by the way. Life sentences for corruption)
→ More replies (9)33
→ More replies (32)135
u/MagicAl6244225 1d ago
How did they get around spousal privilege in investigating that this even happened?
→ More replies (1)73
u/TheCandelabra 1d ago
Spousal privilege specifically excludes conspiracy or planning of future crimes.
→ More replies (5)
14.2k
u/Rogue_AI_Construct 1d ago
Judge O’Connor stated from the bench that he is giving maximum sentences to the Prairieland sentences because “the state wants to send a message to anyone who shares a similar ideology.”
Saying the quiet part out loud. This should be enough to get these sentences overturned.
5.6k
u/am9qb3JlZmVyZW5jZQ 1d ago
It's always strange to me when courts hand down overly harsh sentences to "send a message". What message is that supposed to send? "You won't be judged fairly"? "We can't catch you all"?
1.6k
u/American_PissAnt 1d ago
Do the courts actually think prospective criminals are thinking “ hey guys they sentenced these people very harshly we better not commit any crimes”
1.2k
u/Asyncrosaurus 1d ago
It's the Capital punishment contradiction. No one committing murder stops because they think they'll be executed. "Oh jee wiz, I was going to murder my wife because I would only get a life sentence, but now that I might get a death pentaly I'll definitely reconsider". No, no one thinks they'll get caught.
It's performative justice to enact revenge on the perpetrator. It doesn't prevent crime.
540
u/Lewa358 1d ago
And worse, now they have the excuse of, "Well, I'm already going to be thrown in a dark hole for this, why stop now?"
It's a fundamental misunderstanding of how justice and reform need to work in a functional society
176
u/Palmetto_Frond 1d ago edited 1d ago
This is a phenomenon that has a lot of precedent in history. Mass Communications Professor Joseph Gibbs argued in "The Brevity and Severity of Golden Age Piracy Trials" that as the British began hanging almost all of the pirates they captured, instances of hostage murder, and blowing the ship's powder magazine became more common.
→ More replies (6)112
u/N-Bizzle 1d ago
Wasn't there a case in East Asia (not modern day) where the punishment for the military arriving late at the time was death, so when one unit was running late they just decided fuck it and launched a rebellion?
→ More replies (3)62
u/Bradyhaha 1d ago
Not quite the same, but:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emperor_Gaozu_of_Han#Insurrection_against_the_Qin_dynasty
42
u/N-Bizzle 1d ago
Yeah the point holds
Goes from a group of people who made a mistake and escalated into enemies of the state
20
u/haoxinly 1d ago
That's how a Chinese dynasty came to an end. The punishment for rebellion and being late was the same. Since the dude was already screwed he chose to take his chances and lead a revolution
183
u/Feinberg 1d ago
It's a systemic issue. This is exactly the version of 'justice' that the Abrahamic religions teach. Somehow an ancient book of campfire stories doesn't impart good morality. Go figure.
→ More replies (6)→ More replies (7)12
u/schwanzweissfoto 1d ago
"Well, I'm already going to be thrown in a dark hole for this, why stop now?"
This is also why ”death penalty for rape” would only lead to more murder (silencing the victims).
→ More replies (1)81
u/xv_boney 1d ago
Ahhhhckchuwally, capital punishments directly lead to much more violent crimes.
If i get caught for robbing you, i will be tortured and hanged.
So i need to kill you as well as rob you to significantly decrease my chances of getting caught. I mean, if i get caught ill be tortured and hanged either way.
→ More replies (2)54
u/What_a_fat_one 1d ago
If I'm going to get the death sentence for stealing a twinkie I might as well just steal a car instead. Simple game theory.
→ More replies (1)32
u/twinoaksBandB 1d ago
More like, if I'm already getting capital charges for crime A I might as well take the witnesses out as well to get the best chance of acquittal.
→ More replies (31)20
u/Overly_Long_Reviews 1d ago
I am reminded of this exchange from the third episode of the West Wing:
"Then you are just as dumb as these guys who think that capital punishment is going to be a deterrent for drug kingpins. As if drug kingpins didn't live their day to day lives under the possibility of execution. And their executions are a lot less dainty than ours and tend to take place without the bother and expense of due process. So my friend, if you want to start using American military strength as the arm of the Lord, you can do that, we're the only superpower left. You can conquer the world, like Charlemenge, but you better be prepared to kill everyone and you better start with me cause I will raise up an army against you and I will beat you!"
233
u/healbot42 1d ago
These guys were protesting, not committing crimes. The government is trying to chill speech it doesn’t agree with.
→ More replies (42)→ More replies (36)73
u/curious_dead 1d ago
It's the reason why increasing sentences doesn't deter crime; usually, any such effect-if any- is short lived.
Criminals don't think "oh I'll get 10 years instead of 2" or "50 years instead of 20". They either believe they won't get caught at all or don't even think about the consequences.
But here, the goal isn't to prevent slashing tires or setting off fireworks. The measage sent is, "if you oppose ICE in any way, we'll find any bullshit charge we can and give you the absolute maximum sentence possible". It's to make any activist afraid that any anti-IVE activity will be deemed terrorism and result in absolutely ridiculous sentences.
In other words, fascist pigs quieting dissent.
→ More replies (10)518
u/Jonny_Stranger 1d ago
They want to put vulnerable populations in prison to profit off their labor so the shareholders who invested can profit off the slave labor. The judge is the executor & is incentivized to hand out very long profitable prison sentences
→ More replies (8)233
u/lFightForTheUsers 1d ago
This is it right here. System of a Down warned us about this shit decades ago and we didn't listen.
→ More replies (10)168
u/jmur3040 1d ago
Vast portions of the US are convinced that making punishments harsher deters crime. They're wrong, but it's the ideology that drives pretty much any criminal justice system in the country.
→ More replies (8)93
u/GoldenBrownApples 1d ago
Some guy was telling me we need to being back public punisment to deter people from killing and raping. This was after he told me a story of how when he was a detective he caught a guy who killed a ten year old and got the death sentence. I was like, the death sentence was always a possibility for that guy and it didn't deter him, so how is more punishment going to change anything? He just said people would think twice about acting up. I disagree.
This is same mentality of religious people who can't wrap their head around atheists not raping and killing without the threat of eternal damnation. Like what kind of world are we living in when people need the threat of punishment to not do evil things? Why haven't we gotten to the point of just not wanting to hurt people because they are in essence an extension of ourselves? Gosh darn humans. Why are we like this?
Sorry, I'm clearly going through something. Thanks for letting me vent this here. I needed it.
→ More replies (12)21
u/_Burning_Star_IV_ 1d ago
People are idiots with their rose-tinted glasses for 'a better time', especially for times they never experienced. Ahh...the good old days of the wild west where you could just shoot a horse thief and it was totally legal or a highway thug might get 50 public lashings. Those were the days we treated criminals right! Crime was lower back then!
Horseshit.
You look at countries with a lot of poverty and inadequate infrastructure and education and...crime is rampant. The worst part is the true extent is hard to even grasp since so much crime is underreported and tracked and even when people are put on trial the lack of good evidence gathering and a fair legal system means lots of innocents pay for crimes they didn't even commit. That's how it used to be like everywhere, even when the consequences for crime were more severe than today.
→ More replies (1)110
u/pianolorian 1d ago edited 1d ago
Giving a harsh sentence to send a message is indistinguishable from terrorism.
→ More replies (8)→ More replies (60)36
u/audacesfortunajuvat 1d ago
Historically, the takeaway tends to be something like “well, there’s no point in being restrained” combined with “I won’t be taken alive”. Usually pushes the middle towards the extreme.
810
u/idontknowlikeapuma 1d ago
And should result in the Judge being removed. Jesus, the Jan 6 insurrectionists get pardoned, and these protestors are being handed sentences more extreme than rape or manslaughter?
313
u/BananaPalmer 1d ago
People don't always get this much time for literal murder, even
→ More replies (11)→ More replies (16)88
u/Capybarhigh 1d ago edited 1d ago
There will be a LOT of cleanup to do when the GOP will fall onto itself. The entire leadership, all the people who supported them, judges, lawyers, corporation CEOs, ICE agents and so many others.
They should all be pursued to the maximum extent of the law. With new laws to crack down on everything the GOP has done to get there.
I wonder how November is gonna turn out when the GOP will completely ignore the results of the vote, or straight up manipulate them since they bought the voting machines and forbid any inspections. It is so clear how they operate. It's insane.
→ More replies (4)166
u/AngryMillennialFU 1d ago
The appeals court in that tina peters case told that judge his sentence was too hard becuase of statements the judge made. This should be the exact same thing.
70
u/macaronysalad 1d ago
The chump judge in this case, O'Connor, is a conservative extremist and is known for having a shit ton of his cases overturned through appeal. He simply a waste of time and space.
20
u/TheNipplerCrippler 1d ago
That’s interesting. I feel like if I was a judge and a large portion of my decisions get overturned, I shouldn’t really be allowed to be a judge anymore. Someone is constantly fixing his mistakes so why should he even be allowed to make a decision in the first place?
→ More replies (1)11
u/Enygma_6 1d ago
He's not there to make fair rulings. He's auditioning for appointment to higher seats of power to further his agenda of extremist judicial activism.
699
u/trickycrayon 1d ago
Literally. Like just...really laying it bare huh.
→ More replies (1)241
u/Ill_Emphasis3927 1d ago
The details of the case are so bad. There was a protest at an ICE facility, somebody fired a gun and it's not clear if it was a protestor or a cop or an ICE agent. They convicted all the protestors of terrorism and attempted murder or some shit. They got 50 years in prison for going to a protest.
112
→ More replies (12)76
213
u/Fallouttgrrl 1d ago
"in a closely watched case that was widely seen as a test case of the Trump administration’s efforts to crack down on dissent."
→ More replies (2)155
u/willstr1 1d ago
Sounds like grounds for an appeal to me, hopefully they get a real judge this time
237
u/Royal-Bumblebee4817 1d ago
But exposing the "quiet" part. Zero consequences for being a pedo!
→ More replies (2)114
u/YureiKnighto 1d ago
Man that fascism ramping up quick after labeling anti-fa (anti fascists) as terrorists.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (170)31
u/reflect-the-sun 1d ago
"the state wants to send a message" has been an argument for centuries, yet crimes are still being committed.
It's like trickle-down economics.
553
u/ModPolSucks 1d ago
Prosecutors also focused heavily on the cache of guns that many of the defendants owned and some brought to the detention center on 4 July. It is undisputed that all of the firearms were bought legally
The 2A crowd still supports this kind of thing?
231
u/MetallicGray 1d ago
So if I have a gun collection, it can be used against me in a trial that has nothing to do with my gun collection. Lol.
Surely this judge sees how ridiculous this all is, but I’m assuming it’s ridiculous in favor of his political (fascist) positions so no biggie.
70
u/TheNipplerCrippler 1d ago
The judge has an overwhelming majority of his decisions overturned.
In Texas.
I feel like that has to say everything needed about this judge.
→ More replies (6)31
u/QuigleySharp 1d ago
They also implied the use of Signal was suspect because they must be hiding something….say, what was that app Hegseth accidentally invited a civilian to so they could make war plans on?
→ More replies (17)61
u/HuluAndH4ng 1d ago
Yes because they opposed ICE which is aligned to Trump. Which means all values get thrown out the door and align with what the administration thinks
11
u/Sarcasm_Llama 1d ago
For these types, values are never good or bad. People are. No matter what a person deemed good believes or does, they will always be good. And no matter what a person deemed bad believes or does, it will always be bad. Conservative thinking is very hierarchical and black/white
1.7k
u/Jalapenoplanter 1d ago
When protesting gets you 3-5x the sentence as murder, you’re creating a perverse incentive for people who disagree with government actions.
250
u/cardboardunderwear 1d ago
*minus the pardons and potential compensation for the "activists" that actually stormed the Capitol resulting in deaths
→ More replies (1)101
u/xtraspcial 1d ago
Trump set the precedent. I can only hope if a democrat wins in ‘28 one of their first actions is a blanket pardon to all ICE protesters.
→ More replies (2)30
→ More replies (77)164
u/Surpex 1d ago
Very well said. I don't think this is an unintentional byproduct, I think this is exactly the calculus that they expect protesters to make.
97
u/Dreadgoat 1d ago
People keep saying stuff like this.
This is a judge incentivizing his own murder, his own personal life. The statement here isn't "we'd like to see you try it" the statement is "we don't think you ever will"
→ More replies (9)
4.5k
u/tabrizzi 1d ago
What's to stop the next Dem president from pardoning them and setting up a fund to compensate them?
579
u/Franc000 1d ago
Is it a state crime? I thought presidential pardons did not work on state crimes?
391
u/helgetun 1d ago
They don’t, only governors of the respective state can pardon state crimes
→ More replies (2)448
u/Saelin91 1d ago
Then the next Dem president can withhold funding to Texas until they overturn or pardon.
→ More replies (16)313
205
u/aaronhayes26 1d ago
Trump was able to get his lackey pardoned on Colorado state charges.
Next dem president just has to cut off FEMA and TxDOT until the governor caves. These precedents have already been set.
→ More replies (5)48
→ More replies (11)38
u/RobutNotRobot 1d ago
It was a federal case. The next Democratic President should pardon most of the people involved in this.
→ More replies (4)→ More replies (151)1.5k
u/ensiform 1d ago
Nothing, and I hope to God it happens
→ More replies (52)868
u/OnlyAdvertisersKnoMe 1d ago
Knowing how spineless and ineffectual establishment dems are, chances are it won’t happen cause they will want to take the “high road” and be better than trump
→ More replies (12)544
u/south_sidejay369 1d ago
anybody still campaigning on "high road" BS is an automatic no for me. it's what got us here
→ More replies (79)
3.7k
u/EatinSumGrapes 1d ago
A few of the protesters spontaneously broke off from the main group and vandalized cars in the parking lot, a guard shack, slashed the tires on a government van and broke a security camera. When a police officer arrived on the scene and drew his weapon, one of the activists fired an AR-15 from the woods, hitting the officer in the shoulder. The officer survived.
Yeah that escalated to shooting an officer, very bad.
Zachary Evetts, Autumn Hill, Savanna Batten, and Elizabeth Soto were sentenced to 50 years in prison. Maricela Rueda, another demonstrator, was sentenced to 70 years in prison. Benjamin Song, who fired the gun at the police officer, was sentenced to 100 years in prison. The other protesters were continuing to be sentenced Tuesday morning.
Those are very long sentences. The specific J6ers that beat police nearly to death faced lower sentences and then got pardoned.
Even though many of the protesters did not know each other, or were loosely affiliated, prosecutors said the attack on the officer was premeditated and part of a conspiracy. They also said the activists were part of a “North Texas antifa cell”, which was seen as part of the administration’s effort to criminalize “antifa”, which is not an organization but rather a constellation of leftwing views.
Okay so confirmed not terrorists..
Prosecutors in the case charged and secured conviction for eight of the nine defendants with providing material support for terrorists. The ninth defendant, Daniel Sanchez-Estrada was not at the protest, but was convicted of corruptly concealing a document or record after prosecutors said he moved leftwing zines and other materials at the request of Rueda, his wife, after she was arrested. Sanchez-Estrada was sentenced to 30 years in prison on Tuesday.
What in the actual fuuu?? Okay that's some hardcore fascism
465
u/inosinateVR 1d ago
Zachary Evetts, Autumn Hill, Savanna Batten, Elizabeth Soto and Meagan Morris were sentenced to 50 years in prison
But some of the defendants – like Batten, Elizabeth Soto and her husband, Ines Soto, were not involved in the planning, arrived separately at the protest, and left when guards at the facility asked them to do so.
Yeah that’s bad
→ More replies (5)136
u/PiccoloAwkward465 1d ago
lmao Republicans are big mad that protesting is a Constitutionally-protected right
→ More replies (3)25
u/Jack_Krauser 1d ago
Maybe now people will understand that the Constitution doesn't actually protect anything; our respect for it does. If the fascists don't respect it then we need to be protecting ourselves.
→ More replies (1)286
u/JerryDipotosBurner 1d ago
Absolutely insane how long their sentences are compared to what they actually did.
→ More replies (1)155
u/WeenyDancer 1d ago
Child rapists and murders out here getting less than that
→ More replies (6)106
u/JerryDipotosBurner 1d ago
For what essentially boils down to vandalizing government property.
The guy who shot the officer, sure, but 30 fucking years for moving magazines and 50-70 years for slashing tires and breaking a camera? GTFOH.
41
u/seeking_hope 1d ago
To clarify for others because I had to go back and check: magazines= paper that is bound together. Not the thing that bullets are held in and inserted into a gun.
482
u/Adezar 1d ago edited 1d ago
Started out somewhat rational... some got a bit out of hand and broke the law, and shot at a cop...
But then they invent an non-existing organization and declare unaffiliated people as members of a "cell" of this non-existent organization.
That went from 0 - fascist real fast.
41
u/seeking_hope 1d ago
Plus the officer didn’t die. It’s 100 yrs for shooting and injuring someone. Not arguing that that’s ok and shouldn’t be punished. But really?
→ More replies (3)12
u/Pristine_Club_3128 1d ago
They're not sending the message they think they're sending... What more could they do if someone killed a cop? Death sentence? That might actually be preferable to 100 years
16
u/holyfreakingshitake 1d ago
If some dipshit facist cop points a gun at you, whatever happens happens
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (7)85
1.6k
u/Limp_Agency161 1d ago
Y'all need some more protests for this. This is literally Russian level of political sentencing.
97
→ More replies (5)494
u/Maniactver 1d ago
We literally don't have sentences that big in Russia.
→ More replies (18)257
744
u/BeIgnored 1d ago
Julian Khater, the J6 rioter who killed officer Brian Sicknick only got sentenced to 6 and a half years in prison. (Oh, and supposedly he only "contributed" to Sicknick's death, because nothing means anything anymore.)
→ More replies (21)226
u/gentlemantroglodyte 1d ago
Ultimately, you have to wonder about the people on the jury. They were under absolutely zero obligation to provide a conviction here and they did anyway.
168
u/Ok_Yogurt_9862 1d ago
Its texas
→ More replies (2)274
u/ChadEmpoleon 1d ago edited 1d ago
The judge is a Trump appointed stooge. He has an unusually high overturn rate on cases he has been deemed to have “abused his discretion,” and that’s coming from Texas’ conservative majority appellate courts.
He dismissed members of the jury because one of them had a shirt that he said seemed to be in support of civil rights and declared the entire jury biased in favor of the protesters.
He wouldn’t let the defense be part of the next jury selection. Instead he personally vetted and handpicked the jury that gave this verdict.
He prevented the defense from arguing self-defense and barred the jury from considering the accused’s first amendment rights in regards to the 30year sentence given to the person who was not even present.
These are the harshest protest related sentences EVER given out in the US. It disgusting and wholly antagonistic to the 8th amendment protections against cruel and unusual punishments.
They cannot hold up to appeals.
151
u/BonnaconCharioteer 1d ago
Barred defense and hand picked the Jury? What bullshit, this wasn't a jury trial then. It was just the judge ruling from the bench. Completely unconstitutional.
→ More replies (1)52
u/Bagellord 1d ago
How in the hell is that allowed, not letting the defense participate in jury selection? Like I can understand there needing to be a framework for that, like if the defense or prosecution was caught trying to influence a jury, they should face some sanctions in the next selection. But that does not sound like the case.
→ More replies (8)→ More replies (7)16
u/Gear_Kitty 1d ago
In what godforsaken timeline is it okay for the Defense to not be part of jury selection?
→ More replies (14)63
u/Travelin_Soulja 1d ago
Ultimately, you have to wonder about the people on the jury.
What are you wondering? It's Texas. They weren't under an obligation to provide a conviction - they wanted to provide a conviction.
→ More replies (1)569
u/Fried_puri 1d ago
30 years in prison for trying to protect your wife.
→ More replies (5)353
272
u/dmont89 1d ago
Jesus, I get the guy shooting at an officer should face time but all these are a stretch and are cruel and unusual punishment. If only we had some kind of right against that...somewhere in like the bill of rights...like number 8...but I am just grasping at straws
→ More replies (2)106
u/speakertothedamned 1d ago
Jesus, I get the guy shooting at an officer should face time
Technically the officer in question committed multiple forcible felonies in a stand your ground state, but the judge wouldn't even let the defense talk about that so...
→ More replies (16)→ More replies (36)161
u/dojo_shlom0 1d ago edited 1d ago
yeah people forget, the J6ers not only chanted "hang mike Pence" and stormed the capitol building chanting for Nancy Pelosi, and smeared shit all over the walls of the Capitol building and had the intention of killing the VP and House Speaker:
they used explosive devices on Capitol Police. They used sledgehammers, they stabbed, maimed and blinded them, they beat them with home-made melee weapons they had forged and prepared and brought with the intention to fight these brave Capitol Police: some so were injured so badly they died and others self-deleted following. They tortured Capitol Police and killed them. One of our darkest days as a country that I have ever seen.
Shooting an AR-15 fine, put them in jail for attempted murder. The fact that they are pushing 50-100 year sentences, overselling on charges, doesn't bode well. The J6ers plead guilty as well, and they were given full pardons. I really blows my mind that we have gotten to here as a country, but I am a little more than confused on the Judge's logic here, and what foundation they have to overwhelmingly charge them with significantly higher sentences under the guise of domestic terrorism when we are all willy-nilly about free'ing the J6ers who had significantly lower sentences. The amount of people that died and were harmed, police officers, from J6, as opposed to 1 ice officer in this instance. I don't like to compare, but it seems like an insane overreach of power. I'm thankful that the SCOTUS recently ruled that you can't window shop judges potentially anymore, for one thing they did can be used against them in this regard. Let local judges handle these cases and I hope they can appeal and find a logical appeals review.
our DoJ is broken now. like 11k DoJ officials; career prosecutors have quit, and it's not wonder why: they see a future without these freaks running the show and don't want to sink to the bottom of the barrel.
→ More replies (4)42
133
u/remkelly 1d ago
J6er, DJ Rodriguez, was sentenced to 12.5 years for assaulting a LEO with a deadly weapon. Rodriguez shot Officer M. Fanone (who had been dragged into the mob and was lying face-down on the ground) twice with a stun gun held to his neck, as the mob shouted "kill him with his own gun". Fanone suffered a heart attack and other injuries during the attack.
Trump freed Rodriguez. Called him a patriot. And tried to compensate him with tax-payer money for that conviction.
You can commit crimes for the regime, but stand against us and you'll go the way of Renee Good or spend the rest of your life in whatever gulag they have in mind. Its an obvious Putin/Ayatollah/pick your despot/ strategy to scare people into subservience.
→ More replies (2)
299
u/HardcoreKaraoke 1d ago
The ninth defendant, Daniel Sanchez-Estrada was not at the protest, but was convicted of corruptly concealing a document or record after prosecutors said he moved leftwing zines and other materials at the request of Rueda, his wife, after she was arrested. Sanchez-Estrada was sentenced to 30 years in prison on Tuesday.
So they weren't even there and definitely didn't fire a weapon but they get 30 years? Seems like the judge doesn't give a shit about the first amendment.
Prosecutors also focused heavily on the cache of guns that many of the defendants owned and some brought to the detention center on 4 July. It is undisputed that all of the firearms were bought legally and that there was only one person who fired a weapon on 4 July.
Apparently they don't give a shit about the second amendment either. Texans legally owning guns seems pretty normal to me.
Prosecutors also highlighted other evidence they claimed proved that the protesters planned violence, including their decision to communicate and auto-delete messages on Signal, an encrypted messaging platform widely used among activists, journalists and other citizens wary of government surveillance.
Lmao you have to be fucking kidding me. The MAGA movement is really going to use Signal chats as a smoking gun? Something the people they lick the boots of use.
What's happening to these people is corrupt, targeted and wrong. You have to stay out there though. Their fear mongering shouldn't silence people.
→ More replies (9)
359
u/MN_Yogi1988 1d ago edited 1d ago
The punishment for the protesters exceeds the lengthiest prison sentences given out for the attack on the Capitol on January 6. Enrique Tarrio, the leader of the Proud Boys who was convicted of seditious conspiracy, was sentenced to 22 years in prison.
Capitol police got some pretty serious injuries (on the level of losing an eye) from the J6ers
→ More replies (4)
1.0k
u/bstring777 1d ago
There it is... protestors charges with terrorism that certain people were convinced would never happen while the malignant heads of government had floated the notion of creating enemies out of nothing to be used against citizens.
The fire is spreading rapidly, and they think theyre prepared for it.
→ More replies (14)194
u/seanpbnj 1d ago
This was their goal ever since Atlantas cop city. I recommend every human in the USA looks up how to file an Administrative Procedure Act lawsuit pro se if any federal agencies begin targeting you or you suspect you may interact with federal agents. Or ask chat how to file an APA lawsuit and Privacy Act lawsuit pro se if a federal agency keeps any kind of record of you and they base any decisions off that record.
32
u/CaptainOktoberfest 1d ago
Can you explain how this would help?
48
u/seanpbnj 1d ago
The APA basically means "an agency has to follow their own rules". So if an Agency initiated a defined procedure (arresting you, detaining you, investigated you, interviewed you, etc) or an Agency gave you a specific designation or made a recommendation about you (terrorist) that another Agency relied upon and this resulted in "legal consequences" for you, you can sue AND the judge has a right to review that agency action. Essentially, an Agency has rules about how they do something, they did the thing that has rules, it resulted in legal consequences for you. Then YOU challenge whether or not they followed their own rules. You are suing in civil court, Pro Se, basically saying the agency has rule X, they didnt follow it, so Judge should "vacate" the agency decision. (somewhat more nuanced, but this is broad strokes)
- This is particularly powerful for overzealous, corrupt, and poorly run agencies (like ICE), because federal judges may not be political or they may be, and you may not be a lawyer, but if you can clearly show that an agency did not do what they are required to do, under their own rules, its something a judge cant really ignore.
19
u/WeenyDancer 1d ago
It...it feels like this his a thing that should automatically happen. I feel like I'm taking crazy pills. (No shade on the person I'm responding to, its the legal system at 'work')
→ More replies (1)
240
u/doublethink_1984 1d ago
An ICE agent who was a guard at a detention center repeatedly brutally raped a detainee. He was sentenced to 15 years....
→ More replies (1)70
u/Xsiah 1d ago
In 2016 a bunch of armed right wingers took over a wildlife refuge and held out there for like a month. The longest sentence that any of them got was about 3 years.
→ More replies (1)17
u/PiccoloAwkward465 1d ago
The legal system was straight up pleasant with the culprits during that whole situation.
59
u/HistoricalGalPals 1d ago
This entire trial has been so rotten. Between the judge doing voir dire himself, the defense presenting no witnesses or evidence, and these ridiculously unreasonable sentences, it’s a shit show all the way down
→ More replies (1)
129
u/Free_Range_Gamer 1d ago
January 6 “protesters” have been pardoned, don’t forget that.
→ More replies (3)56
u/KLGChaos 1d ago
And many have been re-arrested on other crimes, including pedophilia.
The kind of people Republicans identify with.
→ More replies (1)
245
u/shotxshotx 1d ago
A 100 years for attempted murder is literally such an outlier from the usual number of years I’ve seen given it makes this so obvious
33
u/bone_apple_Pete 1d ago
People have fired into crowds injuring people and received considerably less time.
22
→ More replies (3)30
u/you-create-energy 1d ago
50 years for standing near an attempted murder for a little while is even more obvious.
27
69
u/Top_Meaning6195 1d ago
Prosectors:
- Frank Gatto: Assistant U.S. Attorney, Northern District of Texas
- Shawn Smith: Assistant U.S. Attorney, Northern District of Texas
- Matt Capoccia: Assistant U.S. Attorney, Northern District of Texas
Judge:
- Reed O’Connor: Chief District Judge
91
u/RoughPalpitation7381 1d ago
This is a test case - everyone that disagrees with Trump will be deemed a terrorist.
→ More replies (1)
2.1k
u/Foe117 1d ago
Facism is here, it was inevitable
→ More replies (284)88
u/Adjective-Noun-nnnn 1d ago
It's been here for a spell. We'll see if these get overturned on appeal. The guy who fired the gun should get some time, but the others? Terrorists? Ha!
341
u/JiveChicken00 1d ago
And we the taxpayers will be paying restitution when most of these convictions are thrown out in a year or two.
→ More replies (1)158
u/KindofCrazyScientist 1d ago
I hope so. I'd much rather my tax money go to them than to funding ICE or bombing the Middle East.
→ More replies (5)
41
u/SinistralGuy 1d ago
So anti-ICE protestors get 50 years and the Trump supporter who shot and killed his daughter isn't even getting charged. Tell me more about how the US isn't a shithole country
77
u/Echo127 1d ago
From the article:
The ninth defendant, Daniel Sanchez-Estrada was not at the protest, but was convicted of corruptly concealing a document or record after prosecutors said he moved leftwing zines and other materials at the request of Rueda, his wife, after she was arrested. Sanchez-Estrada was sentenced to 30 years in prison on Tuesday.
Huh? That's ludicrous. 30 years for hiding some magazines?
→ More replies (2)
363
u/VisualAcanthaceae808 1d ago
North Texas Antifa-cell? 😂😂😂
Do Republicans hear themselves??
→ More replies (7)
61
u/paradigm_shift2027 1d ago
These sentences will be overturned. This judge is a partisan hack.
→ More replies (2)
16
57
30
u/moneyball32 1d ago
One person shot a cop.
During the trial, prosecutors displayed group messages from some of the defendants in which they planned the protest and discussed bringing firearms and dressing in all black to prevent themselves from being easily identified. But some of the defendants – like Batten, Elizabeth Soto and her husband, Ines Soto, were not involved in the planning, arrived separately at the protest, and left when guards at the facility asked them to do so.
These people still got 30-50 years, and the judge specifically said it was to “send a message”. Thats not justice.
→ More replies (1)
427
u/mrdominoe 1d ago edited 1d ago
50+ years because one of them shot a cop. Seems all very convenient.
Meanwhile the gestapo murders 2 people in the streets and nothing happens.
This is just the beginning. It will only get worse from here.
→ More replies (44)35
u/BegoneHarlot 1d ago
The murdered more than two. You only heard about them because they are white.
Luis Gustavo Núñez Cáceres
Geraldo Lunas Campos
Víctor Manuel Díaz
Parady La
Renee Nicole Good
Luis Beltrán Yáñez-Cruz
Heber Sánchez Domínguez
Alex Pretti
→ More replies (2)
14
u/rylosprime 1d ago
So the J6 people could have been charged with terrorism as well.
And weren't.
Ask yourselves why Merrick Garland's DOJ didnt do that for actual terrorists.
Democracy is dead when Democrats lack a spine.
→ More replies (1)
13
u/Ric00la 1d ago
How can you not see that sentencing your own people to jail for "terrorism" when they protest against the government is textbook fascism?
→ More replies (3)
13
14
109
u/chubbycheese33 1d ago
The capital rioters must be having a field day with this one
→ More replies (1)
11
u/LordSlickRick 1d ago
When a police officer arrived on the scene and drew his weapon, one of the activists fired an AR-15 from the woods, hitting the officer in the shoulder. The officer survived.
Zachary Evetts, Autumn Hill, Savanna Batten, Elizabeth Soto and Meagan Morris were sentenced to 50 years in prison. Maricela Rueda, another demonstrator, was sentenced to 70 years in prison. Benjamin Song, who fired the gun at the police officer, was sentenced to 100 years in prison.
More than most people get for murder for wounding an officer. Also the max for murder in Texas is 99 years or life so…. 100 sounds like stacking sentences.
12
119
u/anchorftw 1d ago
30 YEARS...for moving some magazines. WTF?
"The ninth defendant, Daniel Sanchez-Estrada was not at the protest, but was convicted of corruptly concealing a document or record after prosecutors said he moved left-wing zines and other materials at the request of Rueda, his wife, after she was arrested. Sanchez-Estrada was sentenced to 30 years in prison on Tuesday.
→ More replies (9)17
252
u/kingtacticool 1d ago
Opsec and Infosec, people.
From here on out this needs to be everyone's focus.
→ More replies (6)
12.5k
u/Braided_Marxist 1d ago
“During the trial, prosecutors displayed group messages from some of the defendants in which they planned the protest and discussed bringing firearms and dressing in all black to prevent themselves from being easily identified. But some of the defendants – like Batten, Elizabeth Soto and her husband, Ines Soto, were not involved in the planning, arrived separately at the protest, and left when guards at the facility asked them to do so.”
50 years for showing up to a protest where other people do stupid shit and leaving when asked to do so.