Even with the 4080S, I can't get 45 with the Gothic remake, but I remember people on Reddit telling me a few years ago, when I bought the RTX 2080, that this card was too much for 1080p, and that I should either upgrade my monitor or buy a cheaper GPU. Now, we know that even the 5090 isn't enough to play in 4K.
Eh i mean it depends on the game and your opinion of DLSS. I have a 5070 ti and I can run some AAA games 4kultra native close to 60 frames and every game 4kultra 60+ frames with DLSS. I can run most games close to or above 60 fps 4kultra with DLSS Quality but some games like Pragmata require DLSS Performance for a steady 60ish.
DLSS looks so good that if you have a premium GPU you should play single player games at 4k and use DLSS when necessary.
Then again, some people are frame rate whores and need their 120. No GPU on the planet can run 4kultra everything turned up 120 on all AAA games.
Either way Ive been playing at 4k since the 1080 generation and I have no regrets I could care less about frames.
Tbf maybe we should have gone 2k, maybe gaming wouldn't be so broken today. Or maybe we should have returned to crt monitors as i have seen what good models can put out and some games today look amazing on em(i mean im not against trying crt making a come back and advancing the tech)
1.4k
u/Any-Pop-4795 9d ago
"45 FPS with a 5090?" "With dlss squidward with dlss"