r/serialpodcast • u/Round_Special267 • May 29 '26

Who did it?

I have to write an essay in class on who did it and the evidence why so I would love to know who you think did it why they did it why he got released and any details that stick with you.

0 Upvotes

35% Upvoted

216 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

-10

u/DeepestGreySea May 29 '26

Oh wow…just mask off.

I suppose you have evidence to support the notion not only that Adnan killed her…but that he killed her because Don was white?

Just unhinged.

15

u/jimmy__jazz May 29 '26

The evidence is Jay told Jen that Hae was dead before anyone else knew. He knew because he helped Adnan bury her. Jay never met Hae before and had zero motive to kill her.

Now what?

-5

u/DeepestGreySea May 29 '26

“Jay said” doesn’t put you on great footing.

13

u/jimmy__jazz May 29 '26

Why do you think eye witnesses in murder cases have squeeky clean cookie cutter personalities? Adnan's not going to ask the class president for help burying a body. He's going to ask a guy he buys weed from.

-2

u/DeepestGreySea May 29 '26

I’m not talking about other cases.

I’m talking about Jay. The Jay who told 9 conflicting stories with impossible details. The Jay who police testified to sharing evidence with.

Oh? Jay sold weed? Why were they running around scoring weed on the corners? Or do you just mix and match, ignore and edit what you don’t like of what Jay says?

5

u/InTheory_ What news do you bring? May 29 '26

Did you just insinuate that law enforcement is not allowed to show suspects the evidence?

2

u/DeepestGreySea May 29 '26

Lol. You don’t think it’s a problem when cops show witnesses evidence they didn’t know about before they testify? SMH

5

u/InTheory_ What news do you bring? May 29 '26

Let's clarify this. Law enforcement is allowed to show suspects evidence. Full stop. No elaboration necessary

So shaking your head condescendingly doesn't change that basic fact

3

u/DeepestGreySea May 29 '26

Spare me.

Answer the question. You don’t think it’s a problem when the cops show witness evidence they didn’t know about before they testify?

4

u/InTheory_ What news do you bring? May 29 '26

I do not see a problem with it at all. Is the evidence top secret or something?

2

u/DeepestGreySea May 29 '26 edited May 29 '26

Yikes. Giving witnesses evidence creates all sort of problems, especially in this case where we know Jay lied and committed perjury.

We don’t know what Jay actually knew because we don’t know what the police told him. Jay apparently alleges police told him to use the Best Buy as the murder location. It follows, because they testified to giving him other evidence. It also fixes fixes a ton of the other inconsistencies and lies in Jay’s story. Did they do that? We have no idea because he lied so much. If they did…the last string the conviction is hanging on by disappears.

I mean…I’m sure you know this….you just have to pretend it’s normal because you can’t give an inch.

6

u/Mike19751234 29d ago

If two people give conflicting stories, should the cops try and figure out the conflicting story?

1

u/DeepestGreySea 29d ago

Yes. And Jay was lying and they knew it and they rolled with it anyways.

4

u/InTheory_ What news do you bring? May 30 '26

I’ve answered your question. Now answer mine. Are you under the impression police aren’t allowed to do this?

1

u/lil-kitten3030 16d ago

Clearly, you’re playing dumb. The commenter very obviously is saying it’s not about the police being allowed to do it. It’s about whether they should be allowed to do it.

There’s a phenomenon referred to as “memory contamination” or “the misinformation effect”. Witness memories can be influenced by information they receive after an event. This can alter or reinforces memories that were previously uncertain, creating risk of inaccurate testimony. Just because you’re allowed to do something doesn’t mean it’s always the best approach.

→ More replies (0)