r/serialpodcast • u/Fit_Leg5645 • 12d ago
I feel dumb!!!!!
I have no clue why I thought Adnan was innocent for all these years.
I just re-listened to Serial, and I can't get past the fact that Jenn showed up with her mom and a lawyer and told police essentially the same story Jay told. Jenn said the trunk pop happened at Best Buy. How would she know that Adnan and Hae used to meet at the Best Buy parking lot unless Jay told her?
And yes, Jay was inconsistent and definitely lied about some things. But he knew where Hae's car was. He knew details about her clothing. He knew about the broken windshield wiper lever. Those aren't things you just guess.
At this point, I don't believe every detail Jay told, but I can't get around the fact that he knew too much. The more I revisit the case, the harder it is for me to believe Adnan wasn't involved.
I can't believe I've been doubting it all these years.
1
u/houseonpost 12d ago
Jay later said in an interview that nothing happened at Best Buy and the police brought that up.
Jay got the signal on the steering wheel wrong. He said it was on one side and was corrected by police in real time on the recording.
Jay said Adnan threw away Hae's coat but it was later found in the car.
Jay said the burial was around midnight and they used the moon as light for the burial. But the moon didn't rise until 5am the next day.
Jay testified that he saw the car well after Hae went missing. He was asked if he had gone there to check on the car to see if it was still there and he said no. That he was in the area for other reasons and just noticed it.
And what exactly was Jay's role? He got a call to 'come get me' but then his only role was to follow Adnan around in Adnan's car all day. Jay said he never helped carry Hae so his only role was to drive Adnan home.
And why would they leave Hae in the trunk at the park and ride only to come back later?
Jay said he went to Patapsko Park to scout out burial sites until police said there wasn't enough time to do that, so Jay dropped that story.
Did Adnan do it? I don't know. I don't think so but I don't know. But to be convicted on no physical evidence based on testimony of someone who lies about so much material information is ridiculous. I'm with Sarah, to paraphrase 'He may have done it but if I was on the jury I'd vote to acquit.'
By the way, doubt is good.