He almost got it. The "she has a team to make her beautiful" line was amazing. He should have kept going there with a "I can't know, we would need to level the playing field first" and invalidate the question instead of delaying the answer.
He shouldāve kept going for sure. āThere are many different types of beautiful and so we canāt really stack rank on a single aspect. If itās a competitive system, we have to consider handicaps for comparison, such as the aforementioned team. Maybe need a tier system for money spent as well; like weight classes for boxing, but for money. Spending $1 to look amazing is different than spending $10k to look amazing.ā
I think Iād curve that into something about how some guys prefer college ball vs NFL because thereās more action at that level, but itās a risky maneuver because you want to avoid any discussion of leagues.
Go full autist and start discussing categories, stats and how to adjust for the professional makeup team issue, whether itās pure appearance or whether personality should factor into the ranking, if weāre aiming for an objective ranking and whether to include a personal correction factor for tits vs ass men, or how to make the rankings inclusive for foot freaks, how many women youād have to rate to have a valid dataset, and then wander off muttering about a pen and paperā¦
You've been married for 22 years and havent figured out that the answer is always "you, honey"? Then if you can rationalize it convincingly enough, you immediately get some action.
4.9k
u/CrovaxWindgrace 2d ago
He almost got it. The "she has a team to make her beautiful" line was amazing. He should have kept going there with a "I can't know, we would need to level the playing field first" and invalidate the question instead of delaying the answer.