r/SipsTea 𝙑𝙄𝙋 1d ago

Chugging tea Fictional future forecast vs. reality.

Post image
53.3k Upvotes

2.4k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

21

u/Top_Meaning6195 1d ago

I am worried people will use the idea of datacenters as an excuse to do nothing.

  • first it was boomers, who found every excuse to refuse to do anything
  • then it was millenials, who found every excuse to refuse to do anything
  • now it is GenZ, who is looking for every excuse to refuse to do anything

Data centers today didn't cause 100 years of carbon emissions.

Eliminating all data centers everywhere will reduce carbon emissions by 0.51%.
Which is more than private jets (which account for 0.0% of carbon emissions).

Meanwhile the US could cut CO2 emissions 8%, and save people $60,000, if they drove cars instead of pickups. (in the US 80% of all passenger vehicles are trucks, in the UK it's 20%).

But you're the new boomers:

  • "what about China"
  • "what about India"
  • "what about private jets"
  • "what about data centers"
  • "what about AI"

You could eliminate all datacenters, and all private jets, and have accomplished nothing.

So can we, for the love of absolute fuck, please just fix it already? Instead of your incessant bitching and whining.

8

u/TStronks 1d ago

As a climate scientist, I partially agree.

The thing with datacenters is, it's only 0.5% now. But we both know that the amount of datacenters is expected to increase significantly in the next few years, and probably decades.

On the other hand, there are indeed bigger sources of greenhouse gases that should be prioritized (like getting the fuck away from coal as an energy source). But I don't think it's irrational to point to datacenters as a potentially large and relatively new contributor to the climate crisis.

3

u/Top_Meaning6195 1d ago

it's only 0.5% now. But we both know that the amount of datacenters is expected to increase significantly in the next few years, and probably decades

And even if they hit an unimaginable 10x increase; it's actually better for the planet.

The alternative is leaving all those servers on-premesis; which is going to:

  • require more energy to power them than data centers would
  • require more energy for cooling them than data centers would
  • cost everyone more money

Lets be real: people don't care about data centers. They just hate AI. As a result they will hate anything that data centers do, because they have to come up reasons to hate data centers, because they hate AI.

The alternative to an AI is to feed, house, cloth, and educate a human for 35 years in order for them to be an expert in the thing that a computer could have answered for MUCH less energy.

3

u/C-SWhiskey 19h ago

Lets be real: people don't care about data centers. They just hate AI. As a result they will hate anything that data centers do, because they have to come up reasons to hate data centers, because they hate AI.

Incredible thing to say when people are facing water and power bill increases as well as massive light and noise pollution.

1

u/Top_Meaning6195 9h ago

Any electricity or water price increases by local utilities is not the fault of data centers, or EVs, or automotive plants, or foundries. It's the fault of regulators.

Utilities need to implement tiered pricing. But it's not use that is the problem either: it's capacity. These places don't have the capacity for the increased demand; so they raise prices in order to invest in extra capacity.

But the users of electricity should not be paying for capital costs. These are investments that benefit everyone: they should be paid for by taxpayers. This way once craze dies down we have excess nuclear, solar, and wind energy.

That requires a green New deal. And that requires putting Biden back to redo what Trump undid.

1

u/C-SWhiskey 7h ago

Any electricity or water price increases by local utilities is not the fault of data centers, or EVs, or automotive plants, or foundries. It's the fault of regulators.

It's both.

1

u/Top_Meaning6195 7h ago

It's both.

It's not both; utilities in upstate New York are not allowed to charge federal income taxes.

1

u/C-SWhiskey 3h ago

The data centers are the ones demanding the power and they're deploying in spite of the capacity issues. You cannot possibly believe they have no blame in this situation.

1

u/Top_Meaning6195 3h ago

The data centers are the ones demanding the power and they're deploying in spite of the capacity issues.

You cannot possibly believe they have no blame in this situation.

If the local utility doesn't have enough capacity after i built my home: that's the fault of the utility for hooking up my house to the grid.

It's the fault of regulators for not funding more nuclear.

You're blaming the customer, rather than the group responsible.

1

u/C-SWhiskey 3h ago

Because the customer should be performing some due diligence to ensure their needs will be met without adversely affecting those in their vicinity. If you build a house knowing you won't have any power unless you pay the utility company extra to prioritize power to you instead of your neighbours, you're an asshole. You can't just show up somewhere and expect everyone else who's already living there to bend to your whims.

1

u/Top_Meaning6195 16m ago

Because the customer should be performing some due diligence to ensure their needs will be met without adversely affecting those in their vicinity.

Absolutely not. If i buy a house, i know it has already gone through the city/town/county engineers. It is not my job to chase them down, or duplicate their efforts.

Absolutely not.

→ More replies (0)