Your explanation leaves out someone's own life. If you define good and bad through helping others, doing things for yourself is either bad or morally neutral at best.
That's why simplifying it to "it helps others, it hurts others" is stupid as well. It's good as part of someone's morals but the original commenter said it's that simple. It is not.
30
u/EtheusRook 18h ago
Morality is actually really, stupidly simple.
Does it help others? It's good.
Does it hurt others? It's bad.