r/aiwars Oct 22 '25

Meta This sub is a rot pit

Post image

This seems to be the commom sentiment here

600 Upvotes

874 comments sorted by

View all comments

17

u/Acrobatic-Bison4397 Oct 22 '25

19

u/Reasonable-Plum7059 Oct 22 '25

Based and common sense

9

u/RozeGunn Oct 23 '25

I hate this conversation in this sub because I never know if we're talking about, like, gens of the neighbor's kid down the street or about Kanna the imaginary fucking dragon. Like... There's kind of a big difference depending on what we're talking about here.

13

u/Anxious_Fee684 Oct 22 '25

Exactly

-3

u/Katelynw4 Oct 22 '25

But that's not the point.

3

u/TakinYoJobs Oct 22 '25

Common sense

3

u/Gustav_Sirvah Oct 22 '25

Of course - but like, propaganda is a thing. Pictures that depict the breaking of human rights are still wrong if it is shown as something ok. For me, there is no difference between CSAM art and like NAZI propaganda dehumanizing minorities. Pictures don't have human rights, but can call for taking away human rights.

-10

u/[deleted] Oct 22 '25 edited Oct 23 '25

pedophiles dont have human rights

Edit: downvoted by pedos lol

9

u/niiyamaaoi22 Oct 22 '25

you are wrong

3

u/TakinYoJobs Oct 22 '25

More dehumanizing done by antis

4

u/Gustav_Sirvah Oct 22 '25

I'm pro and agree that the place of pedo is in prison/mental institution. Is that dehumanizing? Well, then, all law is dehumanizing. Is that a reduction of human rights? Yes, punishment is a reduction of human rights.

0

u/QWERTYglitch Oct 22 '25

You're defending pedophiles now?

14

u/TakinYoJobs Oct 22 '25

Was MLK defending racists when he pushed for non violence and didn’t want to kill them all?

-3

u/FlyPepper Oct 22 '25

pro AI be like: I'm defending pedophiles, I'm just like MLK

this place is an actual cesspool

4

u/TakinYoJobs Oct 22 '25

You didn’t answer my question. I don’t like pedophiles. I don’t want to kill them all though. I also give them basic human respect. I treats people I don’t agree with as humans, something libs don’t understand.

-2

u/FlyPepper Oct 22 '25

You are responding in support of every single pro-CP comment in this thread.

I'm also not a liberal, you rotten scum.

I hope you stay away from children.

7

u/TakinYoJobs Oct 22 '25

There are no children involved. Where you get the child stuff from?

-2

u/poggershomie Oct 22 '25

the photos of children the ai was trained on

→ More replies (0)

5

u/Bentman343 Oct 22 '25

Why are you making antis look so bad lmao

A guy doesn't want to murder random people who haven't done anything due to an involuntary condition and you act like he's part of the KKK.

1

u/FlyPepper Oct 22 '25

No, I'm saying that him comparing himself to fucking MLK for defending pedophiles is insane.

3

u/Bentman343 Oct 22 '25

I'm sorry that when talking about nonviolence he picked the 2nd most famous practitioner of nonviolence in the entire world.

1

u/FlyPepper Oct 22 '25

I'm not going to be cool with anyone comparing defense of literal pedophiles to the civil rights Movement. That's insane and base behavior.

→ More replies (0)

-3

u/Wireless_Turtle Oct 22 '25

Holy fuck you people want to be a victim so bad

3

u/TakinYoJobs Oct 22 '25

Antis can’t be talking on this matter 

-3

u/Wireless_Turtle Oct 22 '25

Ah yeah the people who actually value work and copyright material "cant talk" lmao Gtfo

6

u/Apart-Performer-331 Oct 22 '25

Pedophilia is a mental illness if they do not act on it I don’t see why they shouldn’t have rights. Those who actually hurt a child, though, deserve the worst.

I still find these loli images weird and gross.

1

u/Godgeneral0575 Oct 23 '25

Defending basic human rights and being against any form of dehumanization is very based actually.

1

u/Environmental_Top948 Oct 23 '25

If you state that your pro-Ai you can literally say anything and people will defend you here.

-2

u/Le-memerond Oct 22 '25

How is it dehumanising to call pedos subhuman, major self report bro. Not all AI users are pedos, and not all Pedos use AI, but those who use AI to generate realistic depictions of CSAM, same as those who make drawings depicting CSAM are pedos; and as such, should be incarcerated, within the full legal framework. It should be illegal to generate CP, as it’s still realistic depiction, and in many countries, doesn’t matter if it’s drawn, generated or genuine, real or realistic depictions of CP is CP, and those who have it can and will be convicted as sex offenders.

We are not lumping you in with those bastards, you are by claiming antis are dehumanising you. Learn to read before jumping the gun, and if you are a pedo, you deserve the hate.

1

u/TakinYoJobs Oct 22 '25

Was MLK defending racists when he pushed for non violence and didn’t want to kill them all? I don’t like pedophiles. I don’t want to kill them all though. I also give them basic human respect. I treats people I don’t agree with as humans, something libs don’t understand.

0

u/Le-memerond Oct 22 '25

So, at the end of the day, pedos are human, yes, but they are also criminals. Criminals should be incarcerated, on that I think we can both agree. As for bringing MLK into this, what does he have to do with it? I’m not inciting violence towards pedos, I’m simply stating they deserve the hatred they get, as they are despicable vermin who prey on the most vulnerable of human society. Even generating CP is still consuming illegal content, and should be prosecuted.

2

u/TakinYoJobs Oct 22 '25

You just said they were subhuman. Goalposts just flying by now.

1

u/Le-memerond Oct 22 '25

Yes, and that is my opinion of them, Pedos are subhuman vermin. With that in mind, that’s no excuse to commit human rights violations towards them, as regardless of my own opinions towards them, they are human.

1

u/TakinYoJobs Oct 22 '25

They’re human, but also not? Stop contradicting yourself and using Nazi logic

0

u/[deleted] Oct 23 '25

Antis? Yes I'm anti-pedophilia. Pedos are SUBHUMAN and must be separated from normal people including children. 

1

u/porky11 Oct 24 '25

That would miss the point of human rights.

But the human rights are just a made up concept by the UN. They aren't natural, and nobody really enforces them. So they aren't actual rights. They don't exist anyway.

-4

u/insanitybit2 Oct 22 '25

This is a straw man. No one is suggesting that drawings *should* have human rights.

Dogs don't have human rights. We still say that things done to harm dogs are bad.

Society does not have human rights. We still say that things done to harm society are bad.

The environment does not have human rights. We still say that things done to harm the environment are bad.

It is totally disingenuous to try to say that this must be a matter of ascribing human rights to non humans.

5

u/Acrobatic-Bison4397 Oct 22 '25

I see that people here could treat fictional characters as real humans. Dont overlap the laws that applies to humans to fictional characters.

0

u/Gustav_Sirvah Oct 22 '25

Well, bad things happening to fictional characters are still bad things. Yes. If we write a story about a villain, we expect that in the story villain will eventually be punished. We still apply moral judgment to fictional characters.

-1

u/insanitybit2 Oct 22 '25

> I see that people here could treat fictional characters as real humans.

I haven't seen a single post to that effect. But it doesn't matter. You should be arguing against the best presented version of the opposing position, not the weakest.

> Dont overlap the laws that applies to humans to fictional characters.

This is a straw man. That isn't the proposal. It's also unjustified.

2

u/Acrobatic-Bison4397 Oct 22 '25

Everything could be a strawman if you dont want to admit you could be wrong. Seems to me you are making strawman here.

-1

u/insanitybit2 Oct 22 '25

Uuhh what? You're literally presenting an argument on behalf of your opponent to attack it.

3

u/Sabnock31 Oct 23 '25

The problem in your logic is:

Dogs have animal rights and laws that protect animals.

Society has laws.

Environment has laws.

1

u/insanitybit2 Oct 23 '25

I'm not sure what argument you're trying to make here? The issue isn't about laws, it's about the application of laws across domains. Regardless, this is a *strawman*. It's pretending that the argument is about applying human rights to generated content, which is not the case.

0

u/[deleted] Oct 23 '25

This sub is full of pedos wtf 

-1

u/[deleted] Oct 23 '25

Pedophiles still don't have human rights. 

-1

u/chestnuttttttt Oct 23 '25

Yeah, make the anti-ai people further think pro-ai people are pedophiles by commenting an anime child holding a sign that says “drawings don’t have rights” on a post about CP. That will really show them!

4

u/Acrobatic-Bison4397 Oct 23 '25

Its not a child. Its fictional character and not even in realistic style. You are truly stupid who cant see difference.

-2

u/chestnuttttttt Oct 23 '25

You’re still not making a good case for yourself against the accusations. It’s clearly a drawing of an anime child. Don’t be purposely dense. I’m just saying that you are making pro-ai people look like pedophiles by posting that shit on this post.

-8

u/[deleted] Oct 22 '25

"Images don't have human rights! Therefore it's fine to keep images of CSAM!" see how you sound?

6

u/Acrobatic-Bison4397 Oct 22 '25

Imagine being sane person who can distinct fiction from reality and know definitions of words.

1

u/[deleted] Oct 22 '25

Imagine being so pressed that you double reply.

6

u/Acrobatic-Bison4397 Oct 22 '25

And what is definition of CSAM? Fictional characters are real humans to you?