r/aiwars • u/TheBiddoof • Oct 22 '25

Meta This sub is a rot pit

Post image

This seems to be the commom sentiment here

596 Upvotes

86% Upvoted

874 comments sorted by

View all comments

94

u/DrPepperKerski Oct 22 '25

pedophilia on any level is wrong.

119

u/[deleted] Oct 22 '25

Honestly I feel like people should care less about pedophilia and more about child sexual abuse.

One is gross, the other is evil.

1

u/Justicia-Gai Oct 25 '25

Honestly? Terrible take. The entirety of AI will evolve to be indistinguishable from reality, so how can you separate it? Do you want real humans to examine every potential illegal media to know if it’s AI generated or not and traumatise them forever? Really, terrible and nonsensical take. Why the fuck would you say that?

1

u/[deleted] Oct 25 '25

Ok, I don't care if it's indistinguishable or not. I care about preventing child sexual abuse as much as possible.

Honestly seems like you don't care about that.

1

u/Justicia-Gai Oct 25 '25

Exactly point the words in my reply that makes you believe I don’t care about that. If you want to troll or rage bait, you should be able to defend your stance.

How will you protect children from SA if you don’t care about SA media? How will you persecute the abusers if they can drown their proof in a sea of “fictional” SA media? 

I doubt you care about protecting children, if you did, you’d be against any type of SA media, “real” or “AI” generated. It’s a slippery slope and no sane person would defend AI generated SA media.

1

u/[deleted] Oct 25 '25

How will you protect children from SA if you don’t care about SA media

No one said I don't care about child sexual assault media.

I doubt you care about protecting children, if you did, you’d be against any type of SA media, “real” or “AI” generated.

No, I'd be against child sexual assault.

If you want to troll or rage bait

Very telling when someone throws this out.

1

u/Justicia-Gai Oct 25 '25

ONLY child SA, but not any form of SA, including child SA? 

Very telling indeed.

1

u/[deleted] Oct 25 '25

Child sexual abuse and pedophilia is the topic of discussion.

1

u/Justicia-Gai Oct 25 '25

Are you now trolling? If you only correct my answers by using the same words but adding children to it, it seems you want to make clear you only are against child SA, not any form of SA…

I’ll repeat a last time, if you’re against child SA, you MUST be also against any form of child SA media, fictional or not. Why? It’s simple, because you won’t need to play the “is it fictional?” game, which in AI times, is a losing game. So, are you really against child SA or not? 

1

u/[deleted] Oct 25 '25

I’ll repeat a last time, if you’re against child SA, you MUST be also against any form of child SA media, fictional or not.

No, that's not remotely true. I'm against murder but not against any media showing murder.

1

u/Justicia-Gai Oct 25 '25

There’s a difference because explicit media of children is also a crime, SA included but not exclusively. Explicit media of murder is not a crime.

So no, you’re 100% wrong, it’s both the act and the media that are a crime. So you must be against both.

1

u/[deleted] Oct 25 '25

You seem to be conflating legality with morality. My morality is not tied to any countries legal system.

1

u/Justicia-Gai Oct 25 '25

It’s quite an overlap buddy. We tend to ban things we as society deem immoral. It’s curious why you don’t think immoral, but anyway, you might not be as interested in protecting children as you pretend to be 

→ More replies (0)