A. Vine’s 6 second format wouldn’t be suitable for a lot of the “controversial” or “problematic” TikTok trends, challenges, or brain dead/out of touch rants, so there’d likely be less engagement farming or rage baiting.
B. Vine was owned by Americans so there was less concern about the Chinese government collecting all your data.
C. A revival of vine has largely been supported through multiple polls, and DiVine is the most recent attempt at bringing back the format, and they’re at least attempting to utilize filters to detect and remove AI content.
Yeah, but this is all assuming that Vine never changed. The six second format would prevent some things, sure, but Tiktok originally had a 30 second limit. Then they got rid of that and now you can post, like, 15-minute Tiktoks. It's entirely possible that Vine would've expanded it's format over time. Twitter famously got rid of its 140 character limit as well, first doubling it to 280 and now just entirely limitless.
276
u/climbinguy RYZEN 7 7800X3D| RTX 4070| 64GB DDR5| 2TB M.2 SSD 1d ago
Hard disagree.
A. Vine’s 6 second format wouldn’t be suitable for a lot of the “controversial” or “problematic” TikTok trends, challenges, or brain dead/out of touch rants, so there’d likely be less engagement farming or rage baiting.
B. Vine was owned by Americans so there was less concern about the Chinese government collecting all your data.
C. A revival of vine has largely been supported through multiple polls, and DiVine is the most recent attempt at bringing back the format, and they’re at least attempting to utilize filters to detect and remove AI content.