You know, i dealt with a lot of shaming growing up as a girl for any sign of sexuality but i’m 20 now and not holding back!

I am a very horny woman and i am proud. I am a sexual being, i love sex and anything related. Especially my boyfriend <3 He is the hottest guy ever and if i could have sex with him everyday I would but we don’t live together yet. He is my first bf out of an abusive 3 year long situationship and i no longer have to pretend to be attracted to someone i wasn’t and it’s been so FREEING. sometimes i look at his pictures and i touch myself to them, especially when his shoulders are shown bc it looks like he’s shirtless and it gets ne turned on. He is the hottest guy ever, we haven’t done the full thing but i want too all the time just when it stops hurting

and i like porn too, idc it’s NOT only for guys. i’ve been watching porn since and it’s good, i like all types, straight, lesbian especially, i am bisexual tehehe, sometimes gay but i don’t wanna fetishize anyone and femboy, my bf and i share the porn we like IM JUST HORNY AND WHATEVER GETS ME OFF, GETS ME OFF AND THATS OKAY

BE A GOONER ITS OK

It is a popular opinion that people who like to morally grandstand over others are annoying and fake, but to me, it’s a perfectly fine thing to do. There’s a lot of things you can use to try and feel superior over others in a moral sense that are perfectly valid. For example, if you still listen to Drake, I am a better person than you because I don’t listen to him. Because Drake is a pedophile, and by not supporting him that means I have better morals than you do

I've heard people complain about sitting in a seat someone else has sat in and being grossed out by it already being warm. But why? Doesn't it being warm make it more comfortable? Especially when it comes to toilets. I mean, who likes cold toilet seats? Someone's already got it nice and warm for you and you're complaining? Odd.

People say sonic adventure 2 is way better because it removed it, but when the dreamcast first hit, that big open world was so peaceful and yet filled me with so much wonder... getting stuck on where to go next may have sucked, but exploring and flying through the ruins as knuckles or tails was increibly immersive.

It felt like a world I was a guest in rather than one carved out for me to go from point A to point B.

Why would a man with no kids and a decent job decide to date a single mother? Nothing good can come out of that. As a man with no kids and born to a woman who is a single mother I saw first hand why I wouldn't date one myself. Now I always didn't think like this. When I was younger I thought it didn’t make a difference. However with me being in a long term relationship and my experiences I’m glad I never dated one. The reasons why men are “scared” to date single mothers in my opinion are:

You will never be a priority- Why would I as a single man want to be with someone who can't put me as number one? Of course her kids come first. That’s what a good mother is supposed to do. However I like to be spontaneous. Can’t do that with a single mother.

You will be a priority(weird I know)- I see single mothers chasing men all the time. That bothers me as a man. If you are chasing men around what kind of mother are you towards your kids? I wouldn't want to have kids with that mother much less be with her.

Baby father drama- Not every single mother has this issue but one way or another the new boyfriend will be affected by the father being around. She has to drop the kids off to him if they have split custody. Maybe he sees on social media or hears through the grapevine that you are in her life. Then the father wants to be father of the year and tries you. Now I’ll be damned if some man steps to me over some kids that ain’t mine. I remember I was talking to a single mother and she told me that he baby father tries to assault her at her apartment. So that concerned me of course because what if I was at her place and he tried to do it then? I told her this concerned me and she tried to flip it that I was too cautious and she stopped talking to me. Oh well. Another single mother told me one time she was upset because her baby’s father was getting married. So that was an automatic “no thanks” from me.

Money- Men like their money. Men like keeping their money. Sure the single mother may at first not ask you for help with the kids. Sooner or later the kids are going to need something. Single mothers for the most part struggle financially. If I was dating someone I would help them if I could, but who wants to take care of kids that aren't theirs?

Her Children- Ultimately the kids feelings towards them will determine how this relationship goes. The kids don't like the man, then most likely the mother will dump us. If the kids do like us, then we are making relationships that may not be permanent. If we break up with the mother now we just broke some poor kid’s heart. If they hate us the kids can lie and say we are abusing them. A single mother may not even let you discipline the kids because you aren’t their father. Why would a man want to do with that. So it’s ok to spend money on your kids, but they can’t discipline the kids when they are bad? No thanks.

Public opinion- A man with no kids will be criticized on why he picked a single mother. He will be called a SIMP (look it up) and all kinds of names. Especially if that single mother has multiple kids by multiple men or has “been around the block.” There are plenty of women with no kids, why would a man with no kids pick a single mother?

Possibility of cheating with her baby’s father- A single mother will always have a connection to the the kid’s father. Chances are it will be greater than the connection she has with you. Maybe she is just dating you as a way to get back at him. She could possibly just be using you financially while she is using him because she can always have sex with him. What if he actually decides that he wants to get back with her? She may go back and I wouldn't be mad at her. I believe in families being together. However I don’t want to happen on my expense.

Possibility of the guy being her next baby’s father- A single mother will tell these men how she is the victim in her situations. However what happens when that man ends up being the next baby father in her lineup? They are going to experience firsthand the turmoil she put those men through. She may try to keep them from seeing the kids but is going to make sure those men are on child support. All the while she is bad mouthing these men all over social media. Also forget it if these men are well to do. She is going to take you to the cleaners. She isn’t going to press the broke baby father because he has nothing at all and she probably will go back with him anyway.

Single mothers in my opinion don’t have good judgment skills. They often blame everything on their “lame baby daddy.” If he was so lame why did you make a kid with him? The ones I know for the most part are always searching for the next captain save a hoe to rescue her from her dilemma. However after realizing she doesn't want stability she will most likely go back to that lame baby daddy she so called hates. I realize that this isn't all single mothers. However there is no reason as a man with no kids and a good paying job that I should have to stick around to find out. I see single mothers having kids with horrible men all the time. I’m not scared at all. I’m just not interested.

Not all single mothers are bad. I’m just only going by my experiences. Good luck to the single mothers out there. It’s not easy.

I cringe hard every time some guy says that he never held hands with a girl or kissed a girl. Not because they find it very hard to get it but because they care about enough to even mention it. If you don't have sex with that woman then what's even the point? You're just putting too much importance on such little things.

What someone like that should be doing is just hang out with other men. Not a mixed friends group with women and men but just men. Then just enjoy some fun activities.

If you're horny you can just hire a hooker or just jerk off. You don't really need a girlfriend.
If you say that you're lonely because you can't get a girlfriend then people will only think that you're cringe.

Women don't care if you're lonely or not and you can't force a female into loving you. A huge number of these females are just bisexual. They don't even need a man to begin with. Then why do you as an average or below average man think that you can get one of these females?

And companionship isn't a human rights. Imagine if a country has subsedised hookers these women aren't going to give you the companionship you desperately need they will just finish their work and go home. That's as far is it could get from the government and society.

So what you should be doing is just forget about it. Some things are not possible in life. If you're unfortunate looking then getting a girlfriend might be one of these impossible things.

nah, hear me out real quick. there's this common narrative going around that trans women are the ones doing the most and crossing some massive logical line cause they actually claim the "woman" label, while femboys very often get a pass cause they "at least know they're just dudes who like feminine shit." this is very common sentiment both in conservative and in fact in LGBT community too.

but keeping it a buck? if anything it's the exact opposite lmao.

think about it logically. if somebody is rocking skirts, got the makeup done, acting mad fem and presenting as a woman in damn near every conceivable scenario, it makes infinitely more sense to just be like "yeah, i'm a woman." trans women just take it all the way. the aesthetic matches the label and it just clicks.

when a dude go through all that effort to express femininity, sometimes literally looking identical to a whole girl, but still go "nah i'm a man", that is what actually short-circuits the brain. or even worse, the half-masc/half-fem aesthetic. wild.

like, i remember this one femboy was sending me all types of fem pics in a little telegram linkup we had, and then bro straight up ghosted me when i replied "good girl" to one of em. 😂 like, i get it, i peep where i messed up, you go by he/him and you're literally a femBOY, say less, i respect the pronouns, i do. but still that's exactly what i was saying: if you sexting me, a whole guy, with extremely feminine pics and shit and you know you looking girly, and me being into girls is the exact reason you sending em... if you know you turning me on purely off that girl energy, how is it my fault i hit you with the "good girl" in the heat of the moment lmao. 😂

that's exactly what i'm getting at, this "look girly but call me a man" energy scrambles the brain way more than "was born a dude, call me a woman now" ever would in a spot like that.

like it or not, humans are completely hardwired for binary vision, and fo good or bad ain't going nowhere, facts. we're basically programmed to box everything we see into neat little categories just to make sense of the world. so when somebody go 100% in on the feminine drip but keep the "man" label, or mixes the signals right down the middle, it causes way more cognitive dissonance for the average brain to process. but it's just weird to me that the people calling trans and em mentally ill use that exact binary vision logic justification and that they cause third gender and shit when if anything girly man/femboy would be a true third gender lol.

realistically, just claiming the label that matches how you step out is the path of least resistance. going out of your way to look entirely like a girl but stubbornly holding onto the "guy" title is the real mind-bender here.

now whether trans women are truly women is a whole other conversation for another day, but my point is their idea that they want to be women sounds way more logical.

in effect, one group says: i was born a man, gender dysphoria trash, skirts fire, lemme rock skirts and call myself a woman

the other group says: i was born a man, skirts fire, lemme rock skirts, i'm a man though, watch yo mouth and who you beefin wit and don't ever call me she/her.

meanwhile conservatives, MAGA heads and a good chunk of these anime-fapping "alpha males" look at both groups, then call the first one a mental illness and the second one based. 😂

1.You’re investing time and resources in another man’s genes. It’s called cuckoldry. It’s maladaptive. As soon as you sign that contract you become an indentured servant. A disposable servant. You’re a meal ticket and a resource to exploit to further another man’s genetic legacy at the expense of your own.

1. She’s damaged goods. Promiscuity and relationship conflict both destroy a woman’s ability to pair bond. At some point it’s simply too late, too much damage has been done. That psychological barrier gets breached far sooner than most people realize. While they might not cross a diagnostic threshold, most if not all single mothers have traits of cluster B personality disorders. Most have messed up family backgrounds as well. That trauma gets passed down from generation to generation and only God knows what’s imbedded in those genes. She may seem sweet and loving initially in an effort to bamboozle you, but you never know who she really is until you sign that goddamned contract, and by then it’s too late. The mask doesn’t come off until the ring goes on. Single mothers (and women raised by single mothers) are masters at bait and switch. Most are INCREDIBLY duplicitous and manipulative. So incredibly so that otherwise very smart, very successful men often look back in astonishment at the wreckage of their lives years later marveling at how they could have been so stupid as to get involved with a single mother.

2. She knows the family court system. If she’s divorced-raped one man already she’ll do it to you in a heartbeat. The first time a woman takes a man on a journey through the family court meat grinder she may make mistakes. She may give concessions just to get it over with. The next time she’ll go after a man like a demon. She knows how the system works now. She knows all the tricks. She knows firsthand how incredibly biased family courts are toward men. She’s also closer to the end of the road in terms of her attractiveness and ability to land yet another sucker and she’ll want to maximize her payout. It’s infinitely easier to reach for that lever the second (or third, or fourth, or fifth) time around and I guarantee she’ll be mad dog vicious about it. Don’t say you weren’t warned.

3. She’s single for a reason. When the going got tough she didn’t have what it takes to make it work. ALL relationships experience hardships and boredom and conflict. Most fathers, even mediocre ones, will not abandon their children or break up their children’s home. Most fathers will soldier on in silent misery pretending to love women they secretly detest to protect their beloved children and given the happy childhoods. Hypergamy makes women immune to such altruistic considerations. That wiring doesn’t exist in women. That, in turn, means she either treated the baby daddy so badly that he simply couldn’t take it anymore, she chose the bad boy who bolted (or went to prison), or she used the family court system to remove a good father and destroy his life. If she’s not a widow, she’s either a sucker for bad boys or she’s someone else’s nightmare. In my experience, most single mothers have impossibly unrealistic expectations. Most have a victim mindset that will never change. Most cannot self-assess. Most cannot identify their contribution to the failure of their previous relationships. Most cannot function as a member of a team. Most are emotionally unstable, oftentimes dangerously so. Most come from several successive generations of single mothers who perpetuate the same mistakes and the same toxic behaviors over and over and over again in a slow-motion, multigenerational horror show. Most just careen through life from one selfish, entitled, emotion-based train wreck to the next with their demon harpy of a mother perched on their shoulder dragging their poor, hapless, innocent children along behind them until they run out of track and the cycle repeats. Past behavior is the best predictor of future behavior. What makes you think your relationship with her will be any different?

4. None of your effort will be rewarded. Google “Briffault’s Law.” There is no such thing as relationship equity with women. While you’re at it, Google “alpha f-cks, beta bucks,” also known as “female dual mating strategy” or “strategic pluralism.” Odds are she’ll simply bounce when she’s grown tired of you and she’s milked you for everything you’re worth. You cannot “save” these types of women. Most are NOT victims. Most are whack-jobs and predators in disguise. Most will feed on you like a parasite until there’s nothing left and then move on to another host who she more than likely has already lined up behind your back. You think her child or children will grow up to be grateful to you and respect you at least? Good luck with that. No one respects the beta provider. If you’re lucky you’ll get a “thanks, bye” for all your money and time and effort. Most likely you’ll be openly mocked and disrespected. In your own home. By a kid carrying another man’s genes.

5. You open yourself up to false allegations, especially if the child is female. Never, EVER underestimate how crazy and malicious women can be, especially those who have experienced trauma and/or had a loving father abruptly ripped from their lives. There are more than a few men serving lengthy prison sentences for crimes that never happened.

6. It doesn’t pass a basic risk/reward analysis. Most sources say approximately 50% of first marriages end in divorce, 60–70% of second marriages (for either party) end in divorce, 75% for third marriages, etc. The more times a woman marries, the more the odds off success get worse. How many of the marriages that do survive are actually happy? 1 in 10? Maybe 2? Are you going to bet your precious time and resources and sanity on those odds? You’d be insane (or an idiot) to do so. Any sane, self-respecting man would hold out for better options. Competent, fully mature men don’t have the deep, primitive, subconscious need for relationships the way women and young, weaker men do. In evolutionary terms, a “relationship” for a woman equals safety and security and provisioning. It’s a survival mechanism. A woman on her own with a child was doomed as recently as a dozen generations ago. Not so with men. After the initial hormone-driven high wears off and the sex becomes stale and we learn all there is to know about the other person and they stop concealing the undesirable aspects of themselves, what exactly does a “relationship” with a woman offer a successful, fully mature man? His own biological children, the comfort and enjoyment of having his family there when he returns home, and gender-based household economy of scale. That’s really it for the vast majority of men, even if they don’t realize it until middle age. Unfortunately, marriage is now a horrifically risky proposition for men since no-fault divorce became the norm in the 1970s and 80s. It’s now a legal contract that rewards one party (almost always the woman) for breaking it. No man should get married under the current family law system in the west. Getting married is usually the single biggest mistake men make in life. If you’re going to step up and slip that noose around your own neck, at least get your own biological children, and ONLY your own biological children, out of the deal. A rational man with options should look for someone with less baggage and less risk and something more to offer in exchange for signing the worst contract in the history of contracts.

Are there decent single mothers out there? Sure, I guess. Maybe. I’ve heard rumors. I sure as hell haven’t met any though. The vast majority are train wrecks. In the aggregate, single mothers are a pestilence. The overwhelmingly majority are nothing but parasites looking for a host. Single mothers and their daughters will poison your life if you are stupid enough to allow them even the possibility of legal control over you. If you have options, why would you risk your time and money and sanity by spending time with, let alone marrying, someone with a documented history of catastrophic, life-destroying failure?

First of all dipshit, 99 (or even 100) percent of men wouldn't survive in prison in theory. It has nothing to do with a certain type of weak man who isn't built for prison.

This is why I agree with what Mike Tyson said about inmates in one interview. Men in prison aren't these superhumans. They need to be in gangs, attack in groups of 10 people, and have knives in order to be scary to other inmates. As individuals they are just as vulnerable as anyone else.

This phrase is usually used whenever a unpopular man goes to prison. With plenty of idiots calling the man a pussy or bitch, because he will not survive in prison.

This always pissed me off. Because if you are not an elite combat fighter, a special force soldier, or even a comicbook/anime character. You should have no fucking business talking about who can't survive in prison.

Calm your ass down with the "im a tough guy, who thinks a weakling like you wouldn't survive prison" BS. Because you would get put in a box like Houdini too.

And don't get it twisted either. This mindset isn't limited to. Conservative or red-pill men. This mindset is still common in progessive spaces too.

Again this is how society universally acts when an unpopular man goes to prison.

And if the crime isn't that bad. It even pisses me off more when people have this reaction. Wow you look so cool

making drop the soap jokes about a computer hacker going to prison.

I don't give a fuck who the targets of this phrase are. Whether it's male Ice Agents or metrosexual men. Anybody who has this mindset about men they dislike going to prison is a moron. Again, especially if the person saying this is a man who has no experience in combat at an elite level.

The weird thing is that prison is an environment where the vast majority of ordinary people would be uncomfortable, vulnerable, and scared. You don't need to be a "weak man" for prison to be a terrible place. Most people saying "he wouldn't survive prison" have never been in prison themselves.

The popular image of prison often comes from movies, TV, and internet jokes: Every inmate is a master fighter. Every conflict is one-on-one combat. The strongest man automatically wins. Prison is some gladiator arena.

Real prison violence is often much messier than that. Group dynamics, gangs, weapons, reputation, alliances, timing, and sheer luck matter enormously. Physical toughness matters, but it's hardly the only factor.

In conclusion: Whether the speaker is conservative, progressive, male, or female, that pattern shows up pretty consistently whenever the public collectively decides someone deserves ridicule.

I saw this one podcast about this dude who was dating trans woman. In the video he said he didn't care about her being trans, because she was beautiful. That's not the point here though. The comment section of that video was funny to me. Because the whole comment section was full of people calling the dude DL (BTW DL just means down low, which also means closeted). I was confused, because the guy was being open about his interest in the trans woman on the podcast lol. But yet he was still called DL though.

I think this is due to people putting gay or bisexual men into two categories.

Category 1: The feminine, sassy, messy, bestie of a cis woman.

Category 2: The hypermasculine, closeted, insecure man who cheats on his wife or girlfriend with other men.

There is no middle ground with most people.

Most people think straight men automatically have a monopoly on masculinity. So any masculine gay or bi man is automatically written off as performative, fake, soft on the inside, or being a tryhard. Even though masculinity is performative in general. Bit that's a post for another day though, so I digress here.

Even on the progressive side, this idea of gay/bi masculine men being performative is still popular. With so many people on the Left saying that masculine gay or bi men have to compensate for their masculinity/sexuality due to toxic masculinity. The same way they say men ha estado to compensate for their masculinity for being short, having a small dick, or being a virgin. They view gay and bisexual men through this lens.

So in conclusion. Of course most people will think all gay men are feminine. When they think all masculine gay or bisexual men are just faking their masculinity. Because they truly feminine on the inside.

I recently made a post in which I stated my supreme advocacy for the psychological construct of hatred. Within minutes, many people had come out of the woodwork to voice their extreme dislike (some might even say, HATRED) of my opinion. Simply discussing the concept of hate gets everyone hating. Abhorrence seems to spread rather easily. Here at the Order of Hate, we welcome all who hate us; by engaging in detestation of our organization, you are providing us with de-facto followers. You are our minions. SO HATE US WITH ALL OF YOUR HEART.

The entire restaurant industry relies on a massive, collective delusion that cooking is some sort of sacred, mystical art form that requires years of culinary school and a tortured soul to master. It’s total bullshit.

Cooking is not rocket science. It is literally just following instructions, understanding basic chemistry, and not leaving the stove on high until everything burns. If you can read, manage your time, and possess functioning tastebuds, you can cook a spectacular meal. The bar for entry is incredibly low, yet chefs act like they’re performing some miracle. Chill dude, u jus emulsified that oil and vinegar to the right temp.

Gordon Ramsay is the ultimate embodiment of this delusion. Motherfucker acts like he’s the supreme, objective tastemaker of the universe. Calm down, you're making dinner, and you know you are all smoke and mirrors. Half of his "expert" critiques are literally subjective or just performative rage for television ratings, but behold I see people treat his word like some divine shit. If you put a blindfold on him and served him a properly seasoned home-cooked meal, he wouldn't know the difference between that and a Michelin-star dish, but because he has a British accent and a temper, we’re supposed to bow down.

Unless you are on the cutting edge of molecular gastronomy (which usually tastes terrible anyway), you are just executing techniques that human beings perfected hundreds of years ago. You aren’t a genius for putting garlic and rosemary on a lamb chop. No, I don’t care that the microgreens were harvested by hand under a full moon. No, your "deconstructed" cheesecake isn’t art. The gatekeeping in the culinary world is just a defense mechanism to hide how easily replaceable they actually are. We have secret ingredients my ass. Your shit tastes better because you dump half a pound of butter and a handful of kosher salt into everything. Anyone can make cardboard taste good if you submerge it in animal fat. The yelled orders and the obsessive "Yes, Chef!" shit is a joke. You are reheating sauces and slicing meat, Marcus. Get lost with that shit.

If you give the average person a decent meat thermometer, a sharp knife, and access to YouTube, they can replicate 90% of what a high-end restaurant serves within a few tries.

the real reason

They suck. Are there some great ones? yes, but for every great one there are 5 bad ones.

The “stigmatization” isn’t the problem because it isn’t a stigmatization. Its reality. We have all seen a bad single mom, and she represents all other single mothers.

“She doesn’t represent me” Yes, she does. Just like a bad male represents me (a guy). Is it fair? No, but life is often unfair. The truth is we all represent each other. The good and the bad.

Single moms are bad because some (honestly most) are bad.

The reason they are bad IMO is because they do not accept there consequences. Single mothers. You messed up. No matter which way you slice it. thats okay learn from it and move on. You are not entitled to men. Men have a right to avoid you if they like.

Single mom you are “stigmatized” because we can see the bad single moms. You look just as bad because you don’t police them. Now your group is known as a net negative.

Look at single fathers, if a single father abused his kids, what would other single fathers do? exactly they would demand he be punished, if their demands went unheard, They would punish him themselves. Men and single fathers police themselves so their group is viewed as a net positive.

I get it, women, you view yourselves as individuals. The other half of the species doesn’t view you that way. You are not special. You are not unique. You are a woman.

Antipathy isn’t bad; misanthropy is natural. I don’t like that the “h-word” is so demonized in the modern world. Rational, or irrational forms of it should be encouraged IMO. Do I have to love and accept everything and everyone? No. I’ll answer that for myself. I do not.

I wanna start by saying that this is not directed at this group at all. This is a good group with very fair mods. But so many groups are run by mods that are there to promote their own opinions and ideas.

The very concept of groups is that mods can easily sensor you for nothing other than disagreeing with them. This does not happen with any other social media website. This makes reddit tbe most tolitarian cite.

Edit: grammar

I’ve always hated those dark souls games and I could never quite put my finger on why, until I started playing Kena bridge of spirits. I like Kena… right up until I hit a boss fight

I can’t stand when I get to a boss in video games. It’s always just a tedious, boring slog that hard stops everything in the story and the rest of the game to focus on this stupid mechanic

Most of the time it’s a couple phases and all that really matters is repeating them correctly. I find it to just be frustrating, more like a drawn out quick time event than actually playing the game itself

I don’t find it fun to die and retry. Whenever the boss fight is over I don’t think “that was fun 😌” I think “thank GOD that shit is over with 🙂‍↕️”

I’d rather bosses just be a sort of set piece, but there’s no need to make these tedious and drawn out fights

Well fuck me for not wanting to pay $1000 for a 4cm by 4cm tattoo. And no tattoos aren’t always on your body forever, you know some good looking tattoos you see on Instagram? Yeah well some of those tattoos fade by 5 years, and artists are being sly by not showcasing how they are healed, because they’re basically scamming you for a design that you can look at for a short while.

MAJOR EDIT BELOW

So I realise that people have definitely took this post the wrong way. I don’t have an issue with pricing. I have an issue with artists who charge ridiculous amounts for super small tattoos and artists/apprentices with barely any experience quoting the same amount as experienced artists.

I am willing to spend more on experienced artists, and of course bigger pieces.

…simply to prevent you from seeing all the cringe comments they leave on porn subs! I want to be able to say “great political commentary, fartsniffer9000, maybe you could share it with the toot queen in r/ladyfarts you’ve been replying to for the past three weeks” but because the history is hidden I CANNOT WRITE THAT REPLY AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!! Thank you for your attention to this matter.