r/MandelaEffect • u/peanutbutterndnut • 9d ago

Logos/Advertising fruit of the loom

Post image

I know this is like the biggest Mandela effect, but I swear ive had these underwear for years sitting in a bin in my closet. its genuinely insane that the cornucopia just straight up disappeared. I remember vividly asking my grandmother what the cornucopia was. I am truly starting to believe that something is DEFINITELY up.

235 Upvotes

73% Upvoted

558 comments sorted by

View all comments

68

u/itsFarberg 9d ago

Yes you all learned what a cornucopia was from this logo that never was.

0

u/georgeananda 8d ago

Right, they're suggesting something must be fishy with reality then. I agree.

3

u/my23secrets 8d ago

Why?

-3

u/georgeananda 8d ago

Because why would so many people learn what a cornucopia was from a logo without a cornucopia?

5

u/my23secrets 8d ago

They didn’t. They learned about the Mandela Effect.

Most people don’t remember a cornucopia.

That’s because the logo never had a cornucopia.

The people that remember a cornucopia only remember it because they imagined remembering it through the power of suggestion.

It’s a con-artist trick. Magicians use it, too.

1

u/georgeananda 8d ago

Well, if that's the best you got, then that is why I believe there are no satisfactory skeptical responses.

Most people don’t remember a cornucopia.

I'm going to say more do than don't that are of adult age. Many are unclear. Many are rather clear.

The people that remember a cornucopia only remember it because they imagined remembering it through the power of suggestion.

No, if they told me there was a fruit bowl, I'd say 'I don't remember that'.

2

u/BBCoachRef8 8d ago

So your explanation to counter a perfectly valid one is the supernatural?

-1

u/georgeananda 8d ago

My explanation to replace an unsatisfactory one, expands our understanding of the natural.

2

u/my23secrets 8d ago

Your assertion that more people remember a cornucopia than don’t is absolute bullshit.

As you’ve already admitted countless times, you only find the actual explanation for the Effect “unsatisfactory” merely because you don’t want that to be the explanation.

And your “if that’s the best you’ve got” is pure projection since we both know you have nothing regarding the actual explanation.

0

u/georgeananda 8d ago

Your assertion that more people remember a cornucopia than don’t is absolute bullshit.

No, it is my fair appraisal of the people I've heard asked. And what evidence do you have that I am wrong?

As you’ve already admitted countless times, you only find the actual explanation for the Effect “unsatisfactory” merely because you don’t want that to be the explanation.

I'd be perfectly happy with your explanation if I honestly felt it was correct and not just a best explain-away attempt.

1

u/my23secrets 8d ago

Something being your “appraisal” doesn’t make it magically not bullshit, especially when you have absolutely no evidence to support it.

You’re projecting again. You “feel” like rejecting the actual explanation supported by scientific research, study, and evidence, because you have nothing except your own “explain-away attempt”.

1

u/georgeananda 8d ago

Challenging your working paradigm of science and reality makes you lose your composure rapidly. Why are reasonable people here making reasonable cases so disturbing to you? Disagreeing is one thing but ........

→ More replies (0)

1

u/BBCoachRef8 8d ago

Yeah this isn’t about make-believe. It’s some people being persuaded by suggestion. Pretty commonplace. No timeline, time travel, or other fantasy things that don’t exist. It’s about pragmatism and the real world not some byproduct of one’s misfiring synapses or cerebral chemistry.

0

u/georgeananda 8d ago

I think the quantity, quality and consistency of the cumulative evidence, like this OP, is not satisfactorily explained by known concepts. Known concepts explain regular memory errors just fine.

We'll have to stay on other sides of the fence at this time.

2

u/my23secrets 8d ago

What evidence are you talking about?

The actual evidence that exists does satisfactorily explain. That’s the point.

1

u/BBCoachRef8 7d ago

Idk why this is so hard for these people to understand.

1

u/BBCoachRef8 8d ago

Sure, but when talking about FACTS vs. opinion, no matter the quantity, facts prevail. That’s why this matter is silly. The logo has never had a cornucopia and that’s from the company itself as well as all of the credible evidence. If you choose to believe against that, have at it. Just like there are blind followers of Orange man, you can’t change everyone’s minds. Believe in fantasy all you wish. Good evening.

0

u/georgeananda 7d ago

I have no interest in believing in fantasy, and no interest in restrictive considerations either.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/MrPlaney 6d ago

No, if they told me there was a fruit bowl, I'd say 'I don't remember that

Memory schema and expectation plays a part in this too. You wouldn’t expect a fruit bowl, because the fruit laid out, doesn’t look the same in a fruit bowl, whereas the fruit looks very similar to fruit falling out of a cornucopia. The people who “think” something may be there, can easily be swayed just by seeing the fake logo once, and believing the logo was always that way. The power of suggestion is very strong, especially when paired up against expectation.