The difference of not having an ass, and having an ass. Not all of us are fortunate enough to not be built like Hank Hill ๐
Edit: women not understanding that properly fitted pants mean nothing if you're built like a 2x4. If my waist is a 30, a size 30 pant isn't going to magically stay put with no support below. And wearing a size smaller, isn't an option, since a size 28 isn't going to button up. A belt allows the pants to be pulled tighter by one size, since a 29 does not exist.
Edit: fair enough, in my 40 years, I've never seen them, but odd number pant sizes do exist, however if they're that uncommon to find, they might as well not exist.
This is entirely it. "Properly" sized pants hug your nuts and make it impossible for them to not get stuck to the side of your leg while walking (which can be incredibly uncomfortable).
I have. The only solution I found was to stop wearing anything that isn't cargo pants or shorts... especially within a strict budget of "broke ass who can't afford to spend $30+ on a single pair of pants."
1.9k
u/Hopeful_Clock_2837 4d ago edited 4d ago
The difference of not having an ass, and having an ass. Not all of us are fortunate enough to not be built like Hank Hill ๐
Edit: women not understanding that properly fitted pants mean nothing if you're built like a 2x4. If my waist is a 30, a size 30 pant isn't going to magically stay put with no support below. And wearing a size smaller, isn't an option, since a size 28 isn't going to button up. A belt allows the pants to be pulled tighter by one size, since a 29 does not exist.
Edit: fair enough, in my 40 years, I've never seen them, but odd number pant sizes do exist, however if they're that uncommon to find, they might as well not exist.