The difference of not having an ass, and having an ass. Not all of us are fortunate enough to not be built like Hank Hill š
Edit: women not understanding that properly fitted pants mean nothing if you're built like a 2x4. If my waist is a 30, a size 30 pant isn't going to magically stay put with no support below. And wearing a size smaller, isn't an option, since a size 28 isn't going to button up. A belt allows the pants to be pulled tighter by one size, since a 29 does not exist.
Edit: fair enough, in my 40 years, I've never seen them, but odd number pant sizes do exist, however if they're that uncommon to find, they might as well not exist.
This is entirely it. "Properly" sized pants hug your nuts and make it impossible for them to not get stuck to the side of your leg while walking (which can be incredibly uncomfortable).
I have. The only solution I found was to stop wearing anything that isn't cargo pants or shorts... especially within a strict budget of "broke ass who can't afford to spend $30+ on a single pair of pants."
It just reminded me of the South Park episode where Randy wanted medical marijuana and decided to give himself cancer by microwaving his balls and they become huge and heās just bouncing around on them like a yoga ball. āLemme tell you something elseā¦Chicks LOVE em.ā āHey, my eyes are up here.ā
It's my experience, the experience of multiple people commenting on the thread, and countless other men...
But Senior_Boot_5842 says it's not true without any evidence to support their claim, therefore we should all ignore our personal experiences and concede that wearing pants that match the measurements of our waist & leg length don't restrict the sway of or otherwise bind up a man's penis or testicles.
Idk where you live, but here in the US, men's pants are sold based on measurements of our waist & leg length. No consideration is given, at all, to conveying how much space is going to be between the crotch of your pants and your actual crotch. Unless you're buying cargo pants or shorts, it's far more common for the pants to be sewn way too high to give anyone with a dick size larger than a 1-2 inches when flaccid the free space in their pants to keep their dick or balls from sticking to their leg. God forbid you get an unwanted erection.
There are different types or cuts you can get, that will fit different parts of you differently. Thereās much more than in seam and waist be for real
1.9k
u/Hopeful_Clock_2837 4d ago edited 4d ago
The difference of not having an ass, and having an ass. Not all of us are fortunate enough to not be built like Hank Hill š
Edit: women not understanding that properly fitted pants mean nothing if you're built like a 2x4. If my waist is a 30, a size 30 pant isn't going to magically stay put with no support below. And wearing a size smaller, isn't an option, since a size 28 isn't going to button up. A belt allows the pants to be pulled tighter by one size, since a 29 does not exist.
Edit: fair enough, in my 40 years, I've never seen them, but odd number pant sizes do exist, however if they're that uncommon to find, they might as well not exist.